In-Depth Polymerization of a Self-Adhesive Dual-Cured Resin Cement

2012 ◽  
Vol 37 (2) ◽  
pp. 188-194 ◽  
Author(s):  
RM Puppin-Rontani ◽  
RG Dinelli ◽  
AB de Paula ◽  
SBP Fucio ◽  
GMB Ambrosano ◽  
...  

Clinical Relevance Polymerization of a dual-cured resin cement is significantly affected by ceramic thickness but not affected by activation modes. Increased irradiation times could potentially lead to higher hardness values in applications where light is not completely blocked by the overlying restoration.

10.2341/05-51 ◽  
2006 ◽  
Vol 31 (3) ◽  
pp. 384-389 ◽  
Author(s):  
C. J. Soares ◽  
N. R. Silva ◽  
R. B. Fonseca

Clinical Relevance Polymerization of dual resin cements is significantly more affected by thickness of feldspathic ceramic restorations than by shade.


2011 ◽  
Vol 36 (6) ◽  
pp. 661-669 ◽  
Author(s):  
E Kilinc ◽  
SA Antonson ◽  
PC Hardigan ◽  
A Kesercioglu

Clinical Relevance Resin cements are generally considered as the material of choice in cementation of all-ceramic restorations. The decision between light- and dual-cure resin cement may depend on the properties of the ceramic restoration as well as the location of the tooth. The ceramic thickness has a more intense effect on polymerization than ceramic shade.


2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
RQ Ramos ◽  
RR Moraes ◽  
GC Lopes

Clinical Relevance The use of multipeak LED light-curing guarantees efficiency on light activation of Ivocerin-containing light-cured resin cement.


1990 ◽  
Vol 63 (3) ◽  
pp. 295-300 ◽  
Author(s):  
R. Blackman ◽  
N. Barghi ◽  
E. Duke

2015 ◽  
Vol 16 (5) ◽  
pp. 347-352 ◽  
Author(s):  
Seok-Hwan Cho ◽  
Arnaldo Lopez ◽  
David W Berzins ◽  
Soni Prasad ◽  
Kwang Woo Ahn

ABSTRACT Aim This study evaluated the effects of ceramic veneer thicknesses on the polymerization of two different resin cements. Materials and methods A total of 80 ceramic veneer disks were fabricated by using a pressable ceramic material (e.max Press; Ivoclar Vivadent) from a Low Translucency (LT) ingot (A1 shade). These disks were divided into light-cured (LC; NX3 Nexus LC; Kerr) and dual-cured (DC; NX3 Nexus DC; Kerr) and each group was further divided into four subgroups, based on ceramic disk thickness (0.3, 0.6, 0.9, and 1.2 mm). The values of Vickers microhardness (MH) and degree of conversion (DOC) were obtained for each specimen after a 24-hour storage period. Association between ceramic thickness, resin cement type, and light intensity readings (mW/cm2) with respect to microhardness and degree of conversion was statistically evaluated by using analysis of variance (ANOVA). Results For the DOC values, there was no significant difference observed among the LC resin cement subgroups, except in the 1.2 mm subgroup; only the DOC value (14.0 ± 7.4%) of 1.2 mm DC resin cement had significantly difference from that value (28.9 ± 7.5%) of 1.2 mm LC resin cement (p < 0.05). For the MH values between LC and DC resin cement groups, there was statistically significant difference (p < 0.05); overall, the MH values of LC resin cement groups demonstrated higher values than DC resin cement groups. On the other hands, among the DC resin cement subgroups, the MH values of 1.2 mm DC subgroup was significantly lower than the 0.3 mm and 0.6 mm subgroups (p < 0.05). However, among the LC subgroups, there was no statistically significant difference among them (p > 0.05). Conclusion The degree of conversion and hardness of the resin cement was unaffected with veneering thicknesses between 0.3 and 0.9 mm. However, the DC resin cement group resulted in a significantly lower DOC and MH values for the 1.2 mm subgroup. Clinical Significance While clinically adequate polymerization of LC resin cement can be achieved with a maximum 1.2 mm of porcelain veneer restoration, the increase of curing time or light intensity is clinically needed for DC resin cements at the thickness of more than 0.9 mm. How to cite this article Cho S-H, Lopez A, Berzins DW, Prasad S, Ahn KW. Effect of Different Thicknesses of Pressable Ceramic Veneers on Polymerization of Lightcured and Dual-cured Resin Cements. J Contemp Dent Pract 2015;16(5):347-352.


2020 ◽  
Vol 8 (9) ◽  
Author(s):  
Allany Oliveira Andrade ◽  
Ana Vitória Leite Luna ◽  
Isabela Alcântara Farias ◽  
Marcelo Gadelha Vasconcelos ◽  
Rodrigo Gadelha Vasconcelos

A Odontologia restauradora deve ser praticada da forma mais conservadora possível. Os laminados cerâmicos, usualmente conhecidos como lentes de contato, são considerados uma boa opção para os procedimentos estéticos, pois o seu preparo é limitado ao esmalte, o que os tornam uma abordagem conservadora. Este trabalho objetiva sintetizar informações de bases científicas que corroborem sobre os laminados cerâmicos com ênfase no seu passo a passo clínico. Em reabilitações com laminados estéticos devem ser selecionadas corretamente os casos clínicos e o tipo de cerâmica mais indicada, pois estas se diferem entre si em suas propriedades mecânicas e estéticas. Além disso, o preparo dentário, quando houver, deve ser de até 0,5mm de espessura. Para a moldagem, o material de escolha deve ser de qualidade, onde o mais indicado é a silicona de adição devido a suas propriedades superiores. No que concerne à etapa de cimentação a técnica que associa o ácido hidrofluorídrico, silano e cimento resinoso promove excelente desempenho clínico em longo prazo, podendo chegar a 90% de sucesso clínico após 13 anos de acompanhamento.Descritores: Prótese Dentária; Estética Dentária; Cerâmica; Facetas Dentárias.ReferênciasTurgut S, Bagis B. Effect of resin cement and ceramic thickness on final color of laminate veneers: An in vitro study. J Prosthet Dent. 2013;109(3):179–86.Andrade AO, Silva IVS, Vasconcelos MG, Vasconcelos RG. Cerâmicas odontológicas: classificação, propriedades e considerações clínicas. SALUSVITA. 2017;36(4):1129-52.Souza ROA, Miyashita E. Lentes de contato cerâmicas como alternativa para correção de giroversões e diastemas em área estética. Prótesenews.2014;1(1):38-50.Alhekeir DF, Al-Sarhan RA, Al Mashaan AF. Porcelain laminate veneers: Clinical survey for evaluation of failure. Saudi Dent J. 2014;26(2):63-7.Kumar GV, Poduval TS, Reddy B, Reddy S. A study on provisional cements, cementation techniques, and their effects on bonding of porcelain laminate veneers. J Indian Prosthodont Soc. 2014;14(1):42-9.Soares PV, Spini PH, Carvalho VF, Souza PG, Gonzaga RC, Tolentino AB et al. Esthetic rehabilitation with laminated ceramic veneers reinforced by lithium disilicate. Quintessence Int. 2014;45(2):129-33.Giray EF, Duzdar L, Oksuz M, Tanboga I. Evaluation of the bond strength of resin cements used to lute ceramics on laser-etched dentin. Photomed Laser Surg. 2014;32(7):413-21.Miyashita E, Oliveira GG. Odontologia estética: os desafios da clínica diária. São Paulo: Napoleão; 2014.Vieira D, Monsores VV. Metal Free - Lentes de contato e coroas totais. São Paulo: Santos; 2013.Anusavice JK, Shen C, Rawls HR. Phillips Materiais Dentários. São Paulo: Saunders Elservier; 2013.Bottino MA. Percepção: estética em próteses livres de metal em dentes naturais e Implantes. São Paulo: Artes Médicas; 2009.Greco DG, Carvalho RAC, Silva MD. Odontologia de alta performance: laminados cerâmicos ultra conservadores. São Paulo: Napoleão; 2015.Monteiro J, Polo GG. Effect of ceramic thickness and cement shade on the final shade after bonding using the 3D master system: a laboratory study. Clin Exp Dent Res. 2016;2(1):57-64.Sapata A, Costa JA, Lenza VJ, Francci CE, Witzel MF, Lodovici E. Lentes de contato: harmonização do sorriso sem desgaste dental. clin int j braz dent. 2013;9(2):154-63.Calixto LR, Bandeca MC, Andrade MF. Enceramento diagnóstico: previsibilidade no tratamento estético indireto. R dental press estét. 2011;8(4):26-37.Baratieri LN, Chain MC. Odontologia restauradora: fundamentos e possibilidades. 2.ed. São Paulo: Santos; 2015.Farias Neto A, Gomes EMCF, Sánchez Ayala A, Sánchez Ayala A, Vilanova LSR. Esthetic rehabilitation of the smile with no-prep porcelain laminates and partial veneers. Case Rep Dent. 2015; 2015: 452765Vanlıoğlu BA, Kulak-Özkan Y. Minimally invasive veneers: current state of the art. Clin Cosmet Investig dent. Cosmetic and Investigational Dentistry. 2014;6:101-7.Alves RH, Venâncio GN, Meira JF, Toda C, Conde NCO, Bandeira MFCL. Aesthetic and functional rehabilitation with Alumina: a case report. Reabilitação estética e funcional com Alumina. Braz Dent Sci. 2016;19(4):119-24.Higashi C, Silva MJ, Gomes JC. Preservação da normalidade do periodonto após procedimentos restauradores. Rev Dicas. 2012;1:20-3.Korkut B, Yanikoğlu F, Günday M. Direct Composite Laminate Veneers. J Dent Res Dent Clin Dent Prospects. 2013;7(2):105-11.Pini NP, Aguiar FHB, Lima DANL, Lovadino JR, Terada RSS, Pascotto RC. Advances in dental veneers: materials, applications, and techniques. Clin Cosmet Investig Dent. 2012; 4:9–16Van Noort R. Introdução aos materiais dentários. São Paulo: Mosby elservier 3º ed; 2010.Cardoso PC, Decurcio RA, Lopes LG, Souza JB. Importância da Pasta de Prova (Try-In) na cimentação de facetas cerâmicas – relato de caso. ROBRAC 2011;20(53):166-71.Amoroso AP, Ferreira MB, Torcato LB, Pellizzer EP, Mazaro JVQ, Gennari Filho H. Cerâmicas odontológicas: propriedades, indicações e considerações clínicas. Rev Odontol Araçatuba. 2012;33(2):19-25.Ferracane JL, Stansbury JW, Burke FJ. Self-adhesive resin cements - chemistry, properties and clinical considerations. J Oral Rehabil. 2011;38(4):295-314.Alavi AA, Behroozi Z, Nik Eghbal F. The shear bond strength of porcelain laminate to prepared and unprepared anterior teeth. J Dent (Shiraz). 2017;18(1):50-5.


Author(s):  
Lincoln Pires Silva Borges ◽  
Gilberto Antônio Borges ◽  
Américo Bortolazzo Correr ◽  
Jeffrey A. Platt ◽  
Sidney Kina ◽  
...  

AbstractThis in vitro study evaluates the influence of pressed lithium disilicate thickness, shade and translucency on the transmitted irradiance and the Knoop microhardness (KHN) of a light-cured resin cement at two depths. One hundred and thirty-five ceramic discs of IPS e.max Press (Ivoclar Vivadent) were fabricated and divided into twenty-seven groups (n = 5) according to the association between translucency: HT (hight translucency), LT (low translucency), and MO (medium opacity); shade: BL2, A1 and A3.5; and thickness: 0.5 mm, 1.5 mm, and 2.0 mm. One side of each ceramic disc was finished, polished and glazed. The irradiance (mW/cm²) of a multiwave LED light curing unit (Valo, Ultradent) was evaluated with a potentiometer (Ophir 10ª-V2-SH, Ophir Optronics) without (control group) or with interposition of ceramic samples. The microhardness of Variolink Esthetic LC resin cement (Ivoclar Vivadent) was evaluated after 24 h at two depths (100 μm and 700 μm). Data were submitted to ANOVA followed by Tukey’s test (α = 0.05). Irradiance and KHN were significantly influenced by ceramic thickness (p < 0.0001), shade (p < 0.001), translucency (p < 0.0001) and depth (p < 0.0001). Conclusions: the interposition of increasing ceramic thicknesses significantly reduced the irradiance and microhardness of resin cement. Increased depth in the resin cement showed significantly reduced microhardness for all studied groups. Increased ceramic opacity reduced the KHN of the resin cement at both depths for all ceramic thicknesses and shades.


2021 ◽  
Vol 9 (8) ◽  
pp. 92
Author(s):  
Hanan Aldryhim ◽  
Omar El-Mowafy ◽  
Peter McDermott ◽  
Anuradha Prakki

(1) Background: The aim of this study is to evaluate the hardness of resin cements polymerized through ceramic disks under different process factors (ceramic type and thickness, light-polymerization units and polymerization time); (2) Method: Three types of ceramic blocks were used (IPS e.max CAD; Celtra Duo; VITABLOCS). Ceramic disks measuring 0.5 mm, 1.0 mm and 1.5 mm were cut from commercial blocks. Two resin cements (Rely X Veneer and Variolink Esthetic) were polymerized through the ceramic specimens using distinct light-polymerization units (Deep-cure; Blue-phase) and time intervals (10 and 20 s). Hardness of cement specimens was measured using microhardness tester with a Knoop indenter. Data were statistically analyzed using factorial ANOVA (α = 5%); (3) Results: Mean microhardness of Rely X Veneer cement was significantly higher than that of Variolink Esthetic. Deep-cure resulted in higher mean microhardness values compared to Blue-phase at 0.5- and 1-mm specimen thicknesses. Moreover, a direct correlation was found between polymerization time and hardness of resin cement; (4) Conclusions: Surface hardness was affected by resin cement type and ceramic thickness, and not affected by ceramic types, within evaluated conditions. Increasing light-polymerization time significantly increased the hardness of the cement.


10.2341/07-93 ◽  
2008 ◽  
Vol 33 (3) ◽  
pp. 321-324 ◽  
Author(s):  
GÁ Galhano ◽  
R. M. de Melo ◽  
S. H. Barbosa ◽  
S. C. Zamboni ◽  
M. A. Bottino ◽  
...  

Clinical Relevance The resin cement polymerization inside the root is decreased, because transmission of light in the apical direction is difficult. This study suggests that the use of translucent posts presents advantages in relation to the opaque posts, however, both do not allow polymerization in the apical region.


2006 ◽  
Vol 31 (1) ◽  
pp. 68-77 ◽  
Author(s):  
H. Jung ◽  
K. H. Friedl ◽  
K. A. Hiller ◽  
H. Furch ◽  
S. Bernhart ◽  
...  

Clinical Relevance The ability of modern light curing units to photocure luting resin through ceramic restorations is dependent on the type of light source, ceramic thickness and use of a self-curing catalyst.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document