scholarly journals Evaluation of Different Methods of Optical Impression Making on the Marginal Gap of Onlays Created with CEREC 3D

2010 ◽  
Vol 35 (3) ◽  
pp. 324-329 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. B. da Costa ◽  
F. Pelogia ◽  
B. Hagedorn ◽  
J. L. Ferracane

Clinical Relevance The marginal gap of ceramic onlays manufactured by Cerec 3D present a similar marginal gap whether the optical impression is taken intraorally using the Cerec powder or extraorally using a stone model.

10.2341/06-16 ◽  
2007 ◽  
Vol 32 (1) ◽  
pp. 60-66 ◽  
Author(s):  
S. Idriss ◽  
T. Abduljabbar ◽  
C. Habib ◽  
R. Omar

Clinical Relevance Even though marginal gap size was not shown to be a direct predictor for the extent of microleakage in resin composite restorations, both material and placement technique appear to be important determinants in microleakage and, thus, probably in clinical outcomes.


2008 ◽  
Vol 33 (6) ◽  
pp. 644-650 ◽  
Author(s):  
S. Reich ◽  
S. Gozdowski ◽  
L. Trentzsch ◽  
R. Frankenberger ◽  
U. Lohbauer

Clinical Relevance The marginal fit of all-ceramic restorations has an important influence on the clinical performance and lifetime of adhesively luted restorations. In proximal boxes, an average marginal gap of less than 100 μm is claimed. These clinical requirements are fulfilled by both processing procedures.


2008 ◽  
Vol 33 (5) ◽  
pp. 502-507 ◽  
Author(s):  
H. Omar ◽  
O. Atta ◽  
O. El-Mowafy

Clinical Relevance Veneered electroformed crowns and In-Ceram alumina crowns made with CEREC 3D produced shade-matching that was significantly better than that obtained with conventional porcelain-fused-to-metal crowns.


2010 ◽  
Vol 57 (1) ◽  
pp. 30-37 ◽  
Author(s):  
Aleksandar Todorovic ◽  
Dejan Lisjak ◽  
Vojkan Lazic ◽  
Aleksandra Spadijer-Gostovic

Introduction. Modern technologies offer a range of benefits and significantly improve specific therapeutic procedures in dentistry. However, despite gaining experience and training there are still some mistakes in their implementation. The aim of this study was to describe the most common errors during intraoral scanning, 'optical impression' procedure, during CAD-CAM technology for production of dental restorations. Material and Methods. Cerec? 3D CAD-CAM system for one visit tooth reconstruction by inlays, onlays, endocrowns, half and complete crowns and veneers from the ceramic material was used in the study. Results. Analysis included 1564 reconstruction during 5 years. The most common causes of errors performing optical impression were the result of: improper preparation of teeth, the instability of the scanner in the mouth of the patient, incorrect position and angle of the scanner to the object scanning, contrast spray applied in uneven layer, the presence of fluid in the region scan, the presence of artifacts in the region gingival sulcus. Conclusion. Optical impression is faster procedure than conventional impression, but technologically sensitive. The most frequent errors are: improper handling of the scanner, inadequate tooth preparation, irregular powder application on the tooth and irregular use in the gingival sulcus.


2010 ◽  
Vol 67 (10) ◽  
pp. 812-818 ◽  
Author(s):  
Branka Trifkovic ◽  
Aleksandar Todorovic ◽  
Vojkan Lazic ◽  
Miroslav Draganjac ◽  
Nemanja Mirkovic ◽  
...  

Background/Aim. One of the results of many years of Cerec? 3D CAD/CAM system technological development is implementation of one intraoral and two extraoral optical scanning methods which, depending on the current indications, are applied in making fixed restorations. The aim of this study was to determine the degree of precision of optical scanning methods by the use of the Cerec?3D CAD/CAM system in the process of making ceramic inlays. Methods. The study was conducted in three experimental groups of inlays prepared using the procedure of three methods of scanning Cerec ?3D system. Ceramic inlays made by conventional methodology were the control group. The accuracy of optical scanning methods of the Cerec?3D system computer aided designcomputer aided manufacturing (CAD/CAM) was indirectly examined by measuring a marginal gap size between inlays and demarcation preparation by scanning electron microscope (SEM). Results. The results of the study showed a difference in the accuracy of the existing methods of scanning dental CAD/CAM systems. The highest level of accuracy was achieved by the extraoral optical superficial scanning technique. The value of marginal gap size inlays made with the technique of extraoral optical superficial scanning was 32.97 ? 13.17 ?. Techniques of intraoral optical superficial and extraoral point laser scanning showed a lower level of accuracy (40.29 ? 21.46 ? for inlays of intraoral optical superficial scanning and 99.67 ? 37.25 ? for inlays of extraoral point laser scanning). Conclusion. Optical scanning methods in dental CAM/CAM technologies are precise methods of digitizing the spatial models; application of extraoral optical scanning methods provides the hightest precision.


1999 ◽  
Vol 9 (1) ◽  
pp. 5-6
Author(s):  
Carrie Bain ◽  
Nan Bernstein Ratner

Due to the large volume of fluency-related publications since the last column, we have chosen to highlight those articles of highest potential clinical relevance.


2006 ◽  
Vol 175 (4S) ◽  
pp. 86-86
Author(s):  
Roland Bonfig ◽  
Hubertus Riedmiller ◽  
Burkhardt Kneitz ◽  
Philipp Stroebel

2004 ◽  
Vol 171 (4S) ◽  
pp. 14-14
Author(s):  
Dieter R. Echtle ◽  
Elizabeth M. Mueller ◽  
Detlef H. Frohneberg

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document