The Effect of Chlorhexidine on Dentin Hybrid Layers In Vivo

10.2341/06-55 ◽  
2007 ◽  
Vol 32 (2) ◽  
pp. 107-111 ◽  
Author(s):  
W. W. Brackett ◽  
F. R. Tay ◽  
M. G. Brackett ◽  
A. Dib ◽  
R. J. Sword ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Relevance ◽  
Resin Composite ◽  
Class I ◽  
Chlorhexidine Digluconate ◽  
Composite Restorations ◽  
Hybrid Layers

Clinical Relevance Degradation of dentin hybrid layers in Class I resin composite restorations is minimal over six months but is lessened by the application of 2% chlorhexidine digluconate after etching.

In Vivo Chlorhexidine Stabilization of Hybrid Layers of an Acetone-based Dentin Adhesive

2009 ◽  
Vol 34 (4) ◽  
pp. 379-383 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. G. Brackett ◽  
F. R. Tay ◽  
W. W. Brackett ◽  
A. Dib ◽  
F. A. Dipp ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Relevance ◽  
Resin Composite ◽  
Class I ◽  
Chlorhexidine Digluconate ◽  
Composite Restorations ◽  
Extensive Degradation ◽  
One Year ◽  
Hybrid Layers ◽  
Dentin Adhesive

Clinical Relevance Extensive degradation of dentin hybrid layers formed with an acetone-based dentin adhesive beneath Class I resin composite restorations was evident after one year unless the teeth received an application of 2% chlorhexidine digluconate after etching.

In Vivo and In Vitro Evaluations of Microleakage Around Class I Amalgam and Composite Restorations

2010 ◽  
Vol 35 (6) ◽  
pp. 641-648 ◽  
Author(s):  
T. Alptekin ◽  
F. Ozer ◽  
N. Unlu ◽  
N. Cobanoglu ◽  
M. B. Blatz
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Relevance ◽  
Resin Composite ◽  
Class I ◽  
Composite Restorations ◽  
Amalgam Restorations

Clinical Relevance The lining of amalgam restorations showed no significant effect on microleakage around restoration margins. In vivo and in vitro evaluations confirmed that microleakage was higher in resin composite restorations than in amalgam.

scholarly journals Effects of Total and Selective Bonding on Marginal Adaptation and Microleakage of Class I Resin Composite Restorations In Vitro

2008 ◽  
Vol 33 (6) ◽  
pp. 629-635 ◽  
Author(s):  
P. R. Schmidlin ◽  
T. Huber ◽  
T. N. Göhring ◽  
T. Attin ◽  
A. Bindl
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Relevance ◽  
Resin Composite ◽  
Class I ◽  
Marginal Adaptation ◽  
Glass Ionomer ◽  
Composite Restorations

Clinical Relevance Within the limitations of the current study, the use of glass ionomer liners improves the margin quality of Class I resin composite restorations and reduces leakage.

scholarly journals Marginal and Internal Adaptation of Bulk-filled Class I and Cuspal Coverage Direct Resin Composite Restorations

2007 ◽  
Vol 32 (5) ◽  
pp. 515-523 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. M. Stavridakis ◽  
A. I. Kakaboura ◽  
S. Ardu ◽  
I. Krejci
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Relevance ◽  
Resin Composite ◽  
Important Influence ◽  
Class I ◽  
Bonding Layer ◽  
Composite Restorations ◽  
Internal Adaptation

Clinical Relevance C-factor has an important influence on marginal and internal adaptation in large posterior cavities. A thick bonding layer does not optimize adaptation in Class I restorations.

scholarly journals Comparison of Proximal Contacts of Class II Resin Composite Restorations In Vitro

2006 ◽  
Vol 31 (6) ◽  
pp. 688-693 ◽  
Author(s):  
B. A. C. Loomans ◽  
N. J. M. Opdam ◽  
F. J. M. Roeters ◽  
E. M. Bronkhorst ◽  
R. C. W. Burgersdijk
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Relevance ◽  
Resin Composite ◽  
Class Ii ◽  
Composite Restorations ◽  
Composite Restoration

Clinical Relevance When placing a Class II resin composite restoration, the use of sectional matrix systems and separation rings to obtain tight proximal contacts is recommended.

Gingival Microleakage of Class II Resin Composite Restorations with Fiber Inserts

10.2341/06-86 ◽  
2007 ◽  
Vol 32 (3) ◽  
pp. 298-305 ◽  
Author(s):  
O. El-Mowafy ◽  
W. El-Badrawy ◽  
A. Eltanty ◽  
K. Abbasi ◽  
N. Habib
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Relevance ◽  
Resin Composite ◽  
Class Ii ◽  
Composite Restorations ◽  
Fiber Inserts

Clinical Relevance Fiber inserts incorporated at the gingival floor of Class II composite restorations resulted in a significant reduction of microleakage scores as compared to restorations made without inserts. This may lead to a reduced incidence of recurrent caries.

Factors Associated with Microleakage in Class II Resin Composite Restorations

10.2341/06-16 ◽  
2007 ◽  
Vol 32 (1) ◽  
pp. 60-66 ◽  
Author(s):  
S. Idriss ◽  
T. Abduljabbar ◽  
C. Habib ◽  
R. Omar
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Outcomes ◽  
Clinical Relevance ◽  
Resin Composite ◽  
Class Ii ◽  
Gap Size ◽  
Marginal Gap ◽  
Factors Associated ◽  
Composite Restorations ◽  
Placement Technique

Clinical Relevance Even though marginal gap size was not shown to be a direct predictor for the extent of microleakage in resin composite restorations, both material and placement technique appear to be important determinants in microleakage and, thus, probably in clinical outcomes.

scholarly journals Marginal Permeability of Self-etch and Total-etch Adhesive Systems

2006 ◽  
Vol 31 (1) ◽  
pp. 60-67 ◽  
Author(s):  
B. M. Owens ◽  
W. W. Johnson ◽  
E. F. Harris
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Relevance ◽  
Resin Composite ◽  
Adhesive Systems ◽  
Class V ◽  
Strict Adherence ◽  
Dentin Surface ◽  
Composite Restorations ◽  
Surface Anatomy ◽  
Self Etch

Clinical Relevance Decreased leakage was associated with Adper Scotchbond Multi-Purpose (total etch) and iBond (self-etch) systems in Class V resin composite restorations. All adhesive systems performed best when bonded to enamel compared to dentin surface anatomy. Clinicians should be aware that strict adherence to manufacturer instructions, when using these materials, is of primary importance.

Marginal integrity and postoperative sensitivity in Class 2 resin composite restorations in vivo

1998 ◽  
Vol 26 (7) ◽  
pp. 555-562 ◽  
Author(s):  
N.J.M Opdam ◽  
F.J.M Roeters ◽  
A.J Feilzer ◽  
E.H Verdonschot
Keyword(s):  
Resin Composite ◽  
Composite Restorations ◽  
Marginal Integrity ◽  
Postoperative Sensitivity
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document