Restorative Treatment Decision Making with Unaided Visual Examination, Intraoral Camera and Operating Microscope

2006 ◽  
Vol 31 (1) ◽  
pp. 55-59 ◽  
Author(s):  
H. Erten ◽  
M. B. Üçtasli ◽  
Z. Z. Akarslan ◽  
Ö Uzun ◽  
M. Semiz
Keyword(s):  
Decision Making ◽  
Clinical Relevance ◽  
Treatment Decision ◽  
Operating Microscope ◽  
Visual Examination ◽  
Restorative Treatment ◽  
Treatment Decision Making ◽  
Occlusal Surfaces

Clinical Relevance The use of an intraoral camera aided in the treatment of occlusal surfaces of molars.

The Use of a Microscope for Restorative Treatment Decision-making on Occlusal Surfaces

10.2341/08-45 ◽  
2009 ◽  
Vol 34 (1) ◽  
pp. 83-86 ◽  
Author(s):  
Z. Z. Akarslan ◽  
H. Erten
Keyword(s):  
Decision Making ◽  
Clinical Relevance ◽  
Treatment Decision ◽  
Operating Microscope ◽  
Posterior Teeth ◽  
Restorative Treatment ◽  
Treatment Decision Making ◽  
Occlusal Surfaces

Clinical Relevance The use of an operating microscope at 16× magnification did not aid in the restorative treatment decision-making on posterior teeth.

Patients’ practices for taking the initiative in decision-making in outpatient psychiatric consultations

2017 ◽  
Vol 13 (2) ◽  
pp. 169-184 ◽  
Author(s):  
Shuya Kushida ◽  
Takeshi Hiramoto ◽  
Yuriko Yamakawa
Keyword(s):  
Decision Making ◽  
Conversation Analysis ◽  
Treatment Decision ◽  
Close Inspection ◽  
Important Resource ◽  
Treatment Decision Making ◽  
The Way

In spite of increasing advocacy for patients’ participation in psychiatric decision-making, there has been little research on how patients actually participate in decision-making in psychiatric consultations. This study explores how patients take the initiative in decision-making over treatment in outpatient psychiatric consultations in Japan. Using the methodology of conversation analysis, we analyze 85 video-recorded ongoing consultations and find that patients select between two practices for taking the initiative in decision-making: making explicit requests for a treatment and displaying interest in a treatment without explicitly requesting it. A close inspection of transcribed interaction reveals that patients make explicit requests under the circumstances where they believe the candidate treatment is appropriate for their condition, whereas they merely display interest in a treatment when they are not certain about its appropriateness. By fitting practices to take the initiative in decision-making with the way they describe their current condition, patients are optimally managing their desire for particular treatments and the validity of their initiative actions. In conclusion, we argue that the orderly use of the two practices is one important resource for patients’ participation in treatment decision-making.

Enhancing Involvement in Treatment Decision Making by Women with Breast Cancer

2007 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mary A. O'Brien ◽  
Timothy Whelan ◽  
Amiram Gafni ◽  
Cathy Charles ◽  
Peter Ellis
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Decision Making ◽  
Treatment Decision ◽  
Treatment Decision Making
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document