scholarly journals Quantifying Variation in Treatment Utilization for Type 2 Diabetes Across Five Major University of California Health Systems

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Thomas A. Peterson ◽  
Valy Fontil ◽  
Suneil K. Koliwad ◽  
Ayan Patel ◽  
Atul J. Butte

<b>Objective:</b> Using the newly created University of California Health Data Warehouse (UCHDW), we present the first study to analyze antihyperglycemic treatment utilization across the five large University of California (UC) academic health systems (Davis, Irvine, Los Angeles, San Diego, and San Francisco). <p><b>Research Design:</b> Retrospective analysis using deidentified Electronic Health Records (EHRs; 2014-2019) including 97,231 type 2 diabetes patients from 1,003 UC-affiliated clinical settings. Significant differences between health systems and individual providers were identified using binomial probabilities with cohort matching.</p> <p><b>Results</b>: Our analysis reveals statistically different treatment utilization patterns not only between health systems but also among individual providers within health systems. We identified 21 differences among health systems, and 29 differences among individual providers within these health systems, with respect to treatment intensifications within existing guidelines on top of either metformin monotherapy or dual therapy with metformin and a sulfonylurea. Next, we identified variation for medications within the same class (e.g., glipizide vs. glyburide among sulfonylureas), with 33 differences among health systems and 86 among individual providers. Finally, we identified two health systems and 55 individual providers that more frequently utilized medications with known cardioprotective benefits for patients with high cardiovascular disease risk, but also one health system and 8 providers who prescribed such medications less frequently for these patients.</p> <p><b>Conclusions:</b> Our study utilized cohort matching techniques to highlight real-world variation in care between health systems and individual providers. This demonstrates the power of EHRs to quantify differences in treatment utilization, a necessary step towards standardizing precision care for large populations.</p>

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Thomas A. Peterson ◽  
Valy Fontil ◽  
Suneil K. Koliwad ◽  
Ayan Patel ◽  
Atul J. Butte

<b>Objective:</b> Using the newly created University of California Health Data Warehouse (UCHDW), we present the first study to analyze antihyperglycemic treatment utilization across the five large University of California (UC) academic health systems (Davis, Irvine, Los Angeles, San Diego, and San Francisco). <p><b>Research Design:</b> Retrospective analysis using deidentified Electronic Health Records (EHRs; 2014-2019) including 97,231 type 2 diabetes patients from 1,003 UC-affiliated clinical settings. Significant differences between health systems and individual providers were identified using binomial probabilities with cohort matching.</p> <p><b>Results</b>: Our analysis reveals statistically different treatment utilization patterns not only between health systems but also among individual providers within health systems. We identified 21 differences among health systems, and 29 differences among individual providers within these health systems, with respect to treatment intensifications within existing guidelines on top of either metformin monotherapy or dual therapy with metformin and a sulfonylurea. Next, we identified variation for medications within the same class (e.g., glipizide vs. glyburide among sulfonylureas), with 33 differences among health systems and 86 among individual providers. Finally, we identified two health systems and 55 individual providers that more frequently utilized medications with known cardioprotective benefits for patients with high cardiovascular disease risk, but also one health system and 8 providers who prescribed such medications less frequently for these patients.</p> <p><b>Conclusions:</b> Our study utilized cohort matching techniques to highlight real-world variation in care between health systems and individual providers. This demonstrates the power of EHRs to quantify differences in treatment utilization, a necessary step towards standardizing precision care for large populations.</p>


Diabetes Care ◽  
2021 ◽  
pp. dc200344
Author(s):  
Thomas A. Peterson ◽  
Valy Fontil ◽  
Suneil K. Koliwad ◽  
Ayan Patel ◽  
Atul J. Butte

2021 ◽  
pp. 105477382110464
Author(s):  
Emine Karaman ◽  
Aslı Kalkım ◽  
Banu Pınar Şarer Yürekli

In this study was to determine knowledge of cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk factors and to explore related factors among adults with type 2 diabetes mellitus (DM) who have not been diagnosed with CVD. This descriptive study was conducted with 175 adults. Data were collected individual identification form and Cardiovascular Disease Risk Factors Knowledge Level (CARRF-KL) scale. A negative correlation was found between age and CARRF-KL score. A significant difference was found between educational status and CARRF-KL score. The individuals described their health status as good, managed their condition with diet and exercise, received information from nurses, adults with DM in their family and those with no DM complications had significantly higher scores in CARRF-KL. The knowledge of an individual with DM about CVD risk factors should be assessed, CVD risks should be identified at an early stage, and individuals at risk should be subjected to screening.


Diabetes Care ◽  
2021 ◽  
pp. dc211107
Author(s):  
Yilin Yoshida ◽  
Zhipeng Chen ◽  
Robin L. Baudier ◽  
Marie Krousel-Wood ◽  
Amanda H. Anderson ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document