scholarly journals Economic Evaluation of Quality Improvement Interventions Designed to Improve Glycemic Control in Diabetes: A Systematic Review and Weighted Regression Analysis

Diabetes Care ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 41 (5) ◽  
pp. 985-993 ◽  
Author(s):  
Teryl K. Nuckols ◽  
Emmett Keeler ◽  
Laura J. Anderson ◽  
Jonas Green ◽  
Sally C. Morton ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Regression Analysis ◽  
Quality Improvement ◽  
Economic Evaluation ◽  
Glycemic Control ◽  
Weighted Regression ◽  
Improvement Interventions ◽  
Weighted Regression Analysis ◽  
Quality Improvement Interventions

scholarly journals Improving Diabetes Care in Rural Areas: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Quality Improvement Interventions in OECD Countries

PLoS ONE ◽  
2013 ◽  
Vol 8 (12) ◽  
pp. e84464 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ignacio Ricci-Cabello ◽  
Isabel Ruiz-Perez ◽  
Antonio Rojas-García ◽  
Guadalupe Pastor ◽  
Daniela C. Gonçalves
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Quality Improvement ◽  
Diabetes Care ◽  
Rural Areas ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Oecd Countries ◽  
Improvement Interventions ◽  
Quality Improvement Interventions

scholarly journals A Systematic Review of Communication Quality Improvement Interventions for Patients with Advanced and Serious Illness

2012 ◽  
Vol 28 (4) ◽  
pp. 570-577 ◽  
Author(s):  
Oluwakemi A. Fawole ◽  
Sydney M. Dy ◽  
Renee F. Wilson ◽  
Brandyn D. Lau ◽  
Kathryn A. Martinez ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Quality Improvement ◽  
Communication Quality ◽  
Serious Illness ◽  
Improvement Interventions ◽  
Quality Improvement Interventions

A Systematic Review of Quality Improvement Interventions in Burn Care

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alan D Rogers ◽  
David L Wallace ◽  
Robert Cartotto
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Quality Improvement ◽  
Full Text ◽  
Evaluation System ◽  
Scientific Evidence ◽  
Cochrane Library ◽  
Burn Care ◽  
Traditional Research ◽  
Improvement Interventions ◽  
Quality Improvement Interventions

Abstract Quality improvement interventions (QIIs) are intended to improve the care of patients. Unlike most traditional clinical research, these endeavors emphasize the sustainable implementation of scientific evidence rather than the establishment of evidence. Our purpose was to conduct a systematic review of QII publications in the field of burn care. A systematic review was conducted utilizing electronic databases (MEDLINE, Embase, and Cochrane Library) of all studies relating to “quality improvement” in burn care published until March 31, 2020. Studies were excluded if no baseline data were reported, or if no intervention was applied and tested. Studies were scored using a novel 10-point evaluation system for QII. We evaluated 414 studies involving “quality improvement” in burn care. Only 82 studies contained a QII while 332 studies were categorized as traditional research. Several traditional research studies made claims to be QIIs, but few met the criteria. Of the 82 QII references, only 20 (24%) were accessible as full-text manuscripts, the remainder were published as abstracts only. The mean score was 7.95 for full-text studies (range 6–10) and 7.4 for abstract-only studies (range 5.5–9.5). Despite the importance of quality improvement (QI) in burn care, very few studies have been published that employ true QI methodology, and many QII studies never advance beyond publication as abstracts in conference proceedings. Based on this systematic review, we propose guidelines to improve the quality of QII submissions.

scholarly journals Economic Evaluation of Quality Improvement Interventions for Bloodstream Infections Related to Central Catheters

2016 ◽  
Vol 176 (12) ◽  
pp. 1843 ◽  
Author(s):  
Teryl K. Nuckols ◽  
Emmett Keeler ◽  
Sally C. Morton ◽  
Laura Anderson ◽  
Brian Doyle ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Quality Improvement ◽  
Economic Evaluation ◽  
Bloodstream Infections ◽  
Improvement Interventions ◽  
Quality Improvement Interventions ◽  
Central Catheters
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document