scholarly journals Psychometric Properties, Norms, and Factor Structure of the Diabetes Eating Problem Survey-Revised in a Large Sample of Children and Adolescents With Type 1 Diabetes

Diabetes Care ◽  
2013 ◽  
Vol 36 (8) ◽  
pp. 2198-2202 ◽  
Author(s):  
L. Wisting ◽  
D. H. Froisland ◽  
T. Skrivarhaug ◽  
K. Dahl-Jorgensen ◽  
O. Ro
Nutrients ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 13 (7) ◽  
pp. 2375
Author(s):  
Calliope Karastogiannidou ◽  
Parthena Giannoulaki ◽  
Ioannis Samaras ◽  
Evangelia Kotzakioulafi ◽  
Triantafyllos Didangelos ◽  
...  

Type 1 diabetes mellitus (T1DM) patients occasionally develop disordered eating behaviors, leading to insulin manipulation without medical consultation, targeting to achieve weight control. In clinical practice, the Diabetes Eating Problem Survey-Revised Version (DEPS-R) questionnaire has been used to evaluate eating disorders in T1DM patients. This study was conducted to validate the factor structure of the Greek version of DEPS-R using Confirmatory Factor Analysis (CFA), to investigate its reliability and convergent validity in Greek T1DM adults and to compare a single factor DEPS-R model with multiple factor models. Participants were 103 T1DM adults receiving insulin, who responded to DEPS-R. Their anthropometric, biochemical and clinical history data were evaluated. The sample presented good glycemic control and 30.1% scored above the established DEPS-R cut-off score for disturbed eating behavior. CFA results revealed that the data fit well to the factor models. The DEPS-R scale had good reliability and was positively linked to BMI, HbA1c, total daily dose and time in range. Model comparison supported the superiority of the 1-factor model, implying that Greek clinicians and practitioners might not have to consider individualized treatment based on various scores across different subscales but they can adopt a single DEPS-R score for an easy and efficient screening for disordered eating.


2021 ◽  
Vol 12 ◽  
Author(s):  
Katarina Uršič ◽  
Valentin Bucik ◽  
Simona Klemenčič ◽  
Nataša Bratina ◽  
Tadej Battelino ◽  
...  

Introduction: A traumatic event is an extremely threatening and frightening experience in an individual's life. Children who are exposed to traumatic events are twice as likely to develop a mental disorder. Screening can provide insight into the traumatic experience of children, identifying those eligible for further evaluation, and support. With this aim, we evaluated the psychometric properties of the Lifetime Incidence of Traumatic Events questionnaire (LITE) in Slovene by calculating retest reliabilty, construct validity (cross-informant agreement) and external validity, where we calculated the correlation of the number of differenet traumatic events with psychopathological symptoms.Methods: 280 child-parent pairs (children aged 11.3 ± 2.2 years) from various Slovenian primary schools participated in the study. They were divided into two groups: 180 healthy primary school students and 100 children with Type 1 Diabetes (our study was a part of a larger study The Influence of Psychobiological Adversity on Children and Adolescents with Type 1 Diabetes Study). Two versions of the LITE questionnaire were used. Children completed the child report (LITE-S) and parents the parent report (LITE-P) version. After 4 weeks, 117 children, and 114 parents filled out the LITEs again. External validity was assessed using the Youth Self Report and Child Behaviour Checklist syndrome-oriented scales.Results: Retest reliability for individual scales was r = 0.469–0.639 (ρ = 0.443–0.636; p < 0.001), but higher for individual items (κ = 0.263–0.821; p < 0.001). Correlations between reports from parents and children were r = 0.313–0.345 (ρ = 0.317–0.348; p < 0.001). The number of different events experienced by children correlated significantly with the measured depressive—anxiety, and posttraumatic stress disorder symptoms.Conclusions: Based on our results, the LITE-S and LITE-P “All events” scale have acceptable psychometric properties for use in research and in clinical practise screening. We recommend looking at single items, taking into consideration the responses from both the child and the parent for more precise information. To improve the precision of the psychodiagnostic capacity of the questionnaire, further research on various populations should be performed.


2013 ◽  
Author(s):  
Parthasarathy Lavanya ◽  
Khadilkar Anuradha ◽  
Ekbote Veena ◽  
Chiplonkar Shashi ◽  
Mughal Zulf ◽  
...  

Diabetes ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 68 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 1063-P
Author(s):  
LAYA EKHLASPOUR ◽  
GREGORY P. FORLENZA ◽  
CARI BERGET ◽  
KEISHA R. BIRD ◽  
KIMBERLY A. ENGLERT ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document