scholarly journals Most Youth With Type 1 Diabetes in the T1D Exchange Clinic Registry Do Not Meet American Diabetes Association or International Society for Pediatric and Adolescent Diabetes Clinical Guidelines

Diabetes Care ◽  
2013 ◽  
Vol 36 (7) ◽  
pp. 2035-2037 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. R. Wood ◽  
K. M. Miller ◽  
D. M. Maahs ◽  
R. W. Beck ◽  
L. A. DiMeglio ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Type 1 Diabetes ◽  
International Society ◽  
Clinical Guidelines ◽  
American Diabetes Association

Humor and A1C: the interaction between humor and diabetes control

2021 ◽  
Vol 0 (0) ◽  
Author(s):  
David S. Greene ◽  
Nancy Dunavant King
Keyword(s):  
Type 1 Diabetes ◽  
American Diabetes Association ◽  
Good Control ◽  
Diabetes Control ◽  
Humor Styles ◽  
Psychological Benefits ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Aggressive Humor ◽  
College Educated

Abstract There is increasing evidence of specific medical and psychological benefits associated with humor within diabetes populations. The benefits of maintaining good diabetes control are also well established. The more general relationship between humor and diabetes control however remains unexplored. The purpose of this study was to examine if there was a difference between people with diabetes with an A1C ≤ 6.99% versus those ≥7.0% on four disparate types of humor. The sample consisted of 284 participants, 65.5% with type 1 diabetes, 68.3% female, 89.1% Caucasian, and 68.7% college educated. Participants completed the Humor Styles Questionnaire (HSQ) and were divided into two groups, A1C ≤ 6.99% and A1C ≥ 7.0%. The A1C ≤ 6.99% group scored significantly higher on both types of positive humor, affiliative humor (P < 0.01) and self-enhancing humor (P < 0.05). There was no significant difference between participants on either type of negative humor, aggressive humor (P > 0.05) or self-defeating humor (P > 0.05). Results indicate that good control (A1C ≤ 6.99%) is associated with positive humor. These findings provide evidence that there is an association between American Diabetes Association recommended levels of control and positive humor styles. Implications regarding positive humor and good diabetes control are discussed.

Proposed Mechanisms of Blood Flow Restriction Exercise for the Improvement of Type 1 Diabetes Pathologies

Diabetology ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 2 (4) ◽  
pp. 176-189
Author(s):  
Morgan T. Jones ◽  
Elroy J. Aguiar ◽  
Lee J. Winchester
Keyword(s):  
Blood Flow ◽  
Type 1 Diabetes ◽  
Glycemic Control ◽  
Resistance Exercise ◽  
American Diabetes Association ◽  
Blood Flow Restriction ◽  
Clinical Population ◽  
Muscular System ◽  
Flow Restriction

Individuals with type 1 diabetes suffer from impaired angiogenesis, decreased capillarization, and higher fatigability that influence their muscular system beyond the detriments caused by decreased glycemic control. In order to combat exacerbations of these effects, the American Diabetes Association recommends that individuals with type 1 diabetes participate in regular resistance exercise. However, traditional resistance exercise only induces hypertrophy when loads of ≥65% of an individual’s one repetition maximum are used. Combining blood flow restriction with resistance exercise may serve as a more efficient means for stimulating anabolic pathways that result in increased protein synthesis and angiogenesis at lower loads, while also promoting better glycemic control. The purpose of this paper is to provide a review on the literature surrounding the benefits of resistance exercise, specifically for individuals with type 1 diabetes, and postulate potential effects of combining resistance exercise with blood flow restriction in this clinical population.

scholarly journals The role of glycemic self-control in diabetes management: based on the American Diabetes Association guidelines (2021)

2021 ◽  
pp. 286-292
Author(s):  
G. E. Runova
Keyword(s):  
Type 2 Diabetes ◽  
Type 1 Diabetes ◽  
American Diabetes Association ◽  
Diabetes Management ◽  
Glucose Monitoring ◽  
Self Monitoring ◽  
Diabetes Technology

Glycemic control represents an integral part of diabetes mellitus (DM) therapy. It is not surprising that diabetes technology is evolving to not only create new routes of insulin administration, but also to improve the measurement of glycemia. A significant number of new glucose monitoring systems have been launched to the market over the past 10 years. Nevertheless, only 30% of patients with type 1 diabetes and very few patients with type 2 diabetes use continuous or flash glucose monitoring. The reason for this is not only the cost and technical difficulties of continuous glucose monitoring, but also its clinical appropriateness. There is indisputable evidence that patients who receive intensified insulin therapy, especially those with type 1 diabetes, need frequent self-monitoring / continuous glucose monitoring. As for patients with type 2 diabetes receiving basal insulin and / or other antihyperglycemic therapy, the data received seem to be contradictory and uncertain. However, most of the recommendations simmer down to the need for self-monitoring of blood glucose levels in patients with type 2 diabetes. The diabetes technology section of the American Diabetes Association guidelines 2021 goes into details about the role of self-monitoring of blood glucose in diabetes management, including the need for continuous patient education on the principles and rules of self-monitoring, interpretation and practical use of the results of self-monitoring, various standards of glucometers, factors affecting the accuracy of the results. 

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document