scholarly journals Early Prediction of Gestational Diabetes Mellitus in Vietnam: Clinical impact of currently recommended diagnostic criteria

Diabetes Care ◽  
2012 ◽  
Vol 36 (3) ◽  
pp. 618-624 ◽  
Author(s):  
T. S. Tran ◽  
J. E. Hirst ◽  
M. A. T. Do ◽  
J. M. Morris ◽  
H. E. Jeffery
Keyword(s):  
Diabetes Mellitus ◽  
Gestational Diabetes ◽  
Gestational Diabetes Mellitus ◽  
Diagnostic Criteria ◽  
Clinical Impact ◽  
Early Prediction

scholarly journals Medicalising pregnancy with new diagnostic criteria for gestational diabetes mellitus: do we need more evidence? Reply to Venkataraman H and Saravanan P [letter]

Diabetologia ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 61 (8) ◽  
pp. 1889-1891
Author(s):  
Sarah H. Koning ◽  
Jelmer J. van Zanden ◽  
Klaas Hoogenberg ◽  
Helen L. Lutgers ◽  
Alberdina W. Klomp ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Diabetes Mellitus ◽  
Gestational Diabetes ◽  
Gestational Diabetes Mellitus ◽  
Diagnostic Criteria

The impact of potential new diagnostic criteria on the prevalence of gestational diabetes mellitus in Australia

2011 ◽  
Vol 194 (7) ◽  
pp. 338-340 ◽  
Author(s):  
Robert G Moses ◽  
Gary J Morris ◽  
Peter Petocz ◽  
Fernando San Gil ◽  
Dinesh Garg
Keyword(s):  
Diabetes Mellitus ◽  
Gestational Diabetes ◽  
Gestational Diabetes Mellitus ◽  
Diagnostic Criteria ◽  
The Impact

scholarly journals Effect of the new diagnostic criteria for gestational diabetes mellitus among Japanese women

2014 ◽  
Vol 6 (3) ◽  
pp. 226-231 ◽  
Author(s):  
Etsuko Nobumoto ◽  
Hisashi Masuyama ◽  
Yuji Hiramatsu ◽  
Takashi Sugiyama ◽  
Hideto Kusaka ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Diabetes Mellitus ◽  
Gestational Diabetes ◽  
Gestational Diabetes Mellitus ◽  
Diagnostic Criteria ◽  
Japanese Women

Studies on Diagnostic Criteria for Gestational Diabetes Mellitus by 75 g Glucose Tolerance Test

2010 ◽  
Vol 13 (2) ◽  
pp. 187-193 ◽  
Author(s):  
Teiji Hamada ◽  
Masahiro Tetsuou ◽  
Kiyotaka Yoshimatsu ◽  
Noriaki Amagase ◽  
Toshiyuki Ooshima ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Diabetes Mellitus ◽  
Gestational Diabetes ◽  
Glucose Tolerance ◽  
Gestational Diabetes Mellitus ◽  
Diagnostic Criteria ◽  
Glucose Tolerance Test ◽  
Tolerance Test

scholarly journals Diagnosing gestational diabetes mellitus: implications of recent changes in diagnostic criteria and role of glycated haemoglobin (HbA1c)

2017 ◽  
Vol 17 (2) ◽  
pp. 108-113 ◽  
Author(s):  
Fahmy W Hanna ◽  
Christopher J Duff ◽  
Ann Shelley-Hitchen ◽  
Ellen Hodgson ◽  
Anthony A Fryer
Keyword(s):  
Diabetes Mellitus ◽  
Gestational Diabetes ◽  
Gestational Diabetes Mellitus ◽  
Diagnostic Criteria ◽  
Glycated Haemoglobin

scholarly journals Comparative analysis of current diagnostic criteria for gestational diabetes mellitus

2012 ◽  
Vol 5 (2) ◽  
pp. 71-77 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mariya V Boyadzhieva ◽  
Iliana Atanasova ◽  
Sabina Zacharieva ◽  
Tsvetalina Tankova ◽  
Violeta Dimitrova
Keyword(s):  
Diabetes Mellitus ◽  
Gestational Diabetes ◽  
Gestational Diabetes Mellitus ◽  
Diagnostic Criteria ◽  
International Association ◽  
Study Groups ◽  
World Health ◽  
Oral Glucose ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Iadpsg Criteria

Background To compare current guidelines for diagnosis of gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) and to identify the ones that are the most relevant for application among pregnant Bulgarian population. Methods A total of 800 pregnant women at high risk for GDM underwent 75 g oral glucose tolerance test between 24 and 28 weeks of gestation as antenatal screening. The results were interpreted and classified according to the guidelines of the International Association of Diabetes and Pregnancy Study Groups (IADPSG), American Diabetes Association (ADA), Australasian Diabetes in Pregnancy Society, Canadian Diabetes Association, European Association for the Study of Diabetes, New Zealand Society for the study of Diabetes and World Health Organization. Results The application of different diagnostic criteria resulted in prevalences of GDM between 10.8% and 31.6%. Using any two sets of criteria, women who were classified differently varied between 0.1% and 21.1% ( P < 0.001).The IADPSG criteria were the most inclusive criteria and resulted in the highest prevalence of GDM. There was a significant difference in the major metabolic parameters between GDM and control groups, regardless of which of the diagnostic criteria applied. GDM diagnosed according to all criteria resulted in increased proportion of delivery by caesarean section (CS). However, only ADA and IADPSG criteria identified both increased macrosomia (odds ratio, 2.36; 2.29) and CS rate. Conclusion The need for GDM screening is indisputable. In our view, the new IADPSG guidelines offer a unique opportunity for a unified national and global approach to GDM.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document