scholarly journals Interventions With Adherence-Promoting Components in Pediatric Type 1 Diabetes: Meta-analysis of their impact on glycemic control

Diabetes Care ◽  
2010 ◽  
Vol 33 (7) ◽  
pp. 1658-1664 ◽  
Author(s):  
K. K. Hood ◽  
J. M. Rohan ◽  
C. M. Peterson ◽  
D. Drotar
Keyword(s):  
Type 1 Diabetes ◽  
Glycemic Control ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Pediatric Type 1 Diabetes

Association Between Adherence and Glycemic Control in Pediatric Type 1 Diabetes: A Meta-analysis

PEDIATRICS ◽  
2009 ◽  
Vol 124 (6) ◽  
pp. e1171-e1179 ◽  
Author(s):  
K. K. Hood ◽  
C. M. Peterson ◽  
J. M. Rohan ◽  
D. Drotar
Keyword(s):  
Type 1 Diabetes ◽  
Glycemic Control ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Pediatric Type 1 Diabetes

Pediatric Type 1 Diabetes: Patients' and Caregivers' Perceptions of Glycemic Control

2018 ◽  
Vol 42 (3) ◽  
pp. 302-307.e1
Author(s):  
Elizabeth Rosolowsky ◽  
Maryna Yaskina ◽  
Robert Couch
Keyword(s):  
Type 1 Diabetes ◽  
Glycemic Control ◽  
Pediatric Type 1 Diabetes ◽  
Diabetes Patients

scholarly journals Patterns of Self-Management in Pediatric Type 1 Diabetes Predict Level of Glycemic Control 2 Years Later

2013 ◽  
Vol 34 (3) ◽  
pp. 186-196 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jennifer M. Rohan ◽  
Jennifer Shroff Pendley ◽  
Alan Delamater ◽  
Lawrence Dolan ◽  
Grafton Reeves ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Type 1 Diabetes ◽  
Glycemic Control ◽  
Self Management ◽  
Pediatric Type 1 Diabetes

scholarly journals The Stricter the Better? The Relationship between Targeted HbA1cValues and Metabolic Control of Pediatric Type 1 Diabetes Mellitus

2016 ◽  
Vol 2016 ◽  
pp. 1-7 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marcin Braun ◽  
Bartlomiej Tomasik ◽  
Ewa Wrona ◽  
Wojciech Fendler ◽  
Przemyslawa Jarosz-Chobot ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Diabetes Mellitus ◽  
Type 1 Diabetes ◽  
Type 1 Diabetes Mellitus ◽  
Metabolic Control ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Group A ◽  
Study Population ◽  
A Prospective Study ◽  
Pediatric Type 1 Diabetes

Introduction. It remains unclear howHbA1crecommendations influence metabolic control of paediatric patients with type 1 diabetes mellitus. To evaluate this we compared reportedHbA1cwith guideline thresholds.Materials and Methods. We searched systematically MEDLINE and EMBASE for studies reporting onHbA1cin children with T1DM and grouped them according to targetedHbA1cobtained from regional guidelines. We assessed the discrepancies in the metabolic control between these groups by comparing meanHbA1cextracted from each study and the differences between actual and targetedHbA1c.Results. We included 105 from 1365 searched studies. The median (IQR)HbA1cfor the study population was 8.30% (8.00%–8.70%) and was lower in “6.5%” than in “7.5%” as targetedHbA1clevel (8.20% (7.85%–8.57%) versus 8.40% (8.20%–8.80%);p=0.028). Median difference between actual and targetedHbA1cwas 1.20% (0.80%–1.70%) and was higher in “6.5%” than in “7.5%” (1.70% (1.30%–2.07%) versus 0.90% (0.70%–1.30%), resp.;p<0.001).Conclusions. Our study indicates that the 7.5% threshold results inHbA1clevels being closer to the therapeutic goal, but the actual values are still higher than those observed in the “6.5%” group. A meta-analysis of raw data from national registries or a prospective study comparing both approaches is warranted as the next step to examine this subject further.

Glycemic Control in Pediatric Type 1 Diabetes: Role of Caregiver Literacy

PEDIATRICS ◽  
2010 ◽  
Vol 125 (5) ◽  
pp. e1104-e1108 ◽  
Author(s):  
K. Hassan ◽  
R. A. Heptulla
Keyword(s):  
Type 1 Diabetes ◽  
Glycemic Control ◽  
Pediatric Type 1 Diabetes
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document