scholarly journals Validity of a Single-Factor Model Underlying the Metabolic Syndrome in Children: A confirmatory factor analysis

Diabetes Care ◽  
2010 ◽  
Vol 33 (6) ◽  
pp. 1370-1372 ◽  
Author(s):  
V. Martinez-Vizcaino ◽  
M. S. Martinez ◽  
F. S. Aguilar ◽  
S. S. Martinez ◽  
R. F. Gutierrez ◽  
...  
2011 ◽  
Vol 64 (5) ◽  
pp. 379-384
Author(s):  
Montserrat Solera-Martínez ◽  
Sara López-Martínez ◽  
Mairena Sánchez-López ◽  
Pablo Moya-Martínez ◽  
Blanca Notario-Pacheco ◽  
...  

Diabetes Care ◽  
2006 ◽  
Vol 29 (7) ◽  
pp. 1720-1720 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. Pladevall ◽  
B. Singal ◽  
L. K. Williams ◽  
C. Brotons ◽  
H. Guyer ◽  
...  

Diabetes Care ◽  
2005 ◽  
Vol 29 (1) ◽  
pp. 113-122 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. Pladevall ◽  
B. Singal ◽  
L. K. Williams ◽  
C. Brotons ◽  
H. Guyer ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Sarah Beale ◽  
Silia Vitoratou ◽  
Sheena Liness

Abstract Background: Effective monitoring of cognitive behaviour therapy (CBT) competence depends on psychometrically robust assessment methods. While the UK Cognitive Therapy Scale – Revised (CTS-R; Blackburn et al., 2001) has become a widely used competence measure in CBT training, practice and research, its underlying factor structure has never been investigated. Aims: This study aimed to present the first investigation into the factor structure of the CTS-R based on a large sample of postgraduate CBT trainee recordings. Method: Trainees (n = 382) provided 746 mid-treatment audio recordings for depression (n = 373) and anxiety (n = 373) cases scored on the CTS-R by expert markers. Tapes were split into two equal samples counterbalanced by diagnosis and with one tape per trainee. Exploratory factor analysis was conducted. The suggested factor structure and a widely used theoretical two-factor model were tested with confirmatory factor analysis. Measurement invariance was assessed by diagnostic group (depression versus anxiety). Results: Exploratory factor analysis suggested a single-factor solution (98.68% explained variance), which was supported by confirmatory factor analysis. All 12 CTS-R items were found to contribute to this single factor. The univariate model demonstrated full metric invariance and partial scalar invariance by diagnosis, with one item (item 10 – Conceptual Integration) demonstrating scalar non-invariance. Conclusions: Findings indicate that the CTS-R is a robust homogenous measure and do not support division into the widely used theoretical generic versus CBT-specific competency subscales. Investigation into the CTS-R factor structure in other populations is warranted.


Author(s):  
Valeschka Martins Guerra ◽  
Leogildo Alves Freires ◽  
Clarisse Lourenço Cintra ◽  
Marcella Bastos Cacciari ◽  
Naiara Ferreira Vieira Castello

This study aimed at presenting the development and psychometric evidence of the Importance and Perception of Character Strengths Scale (IPCSS)-Professor Version. Two quantitative studies were conducted. In Study 1 the respondents were 214 college professors (mean age = 39.21; SD = 9.77; 55.6 % females), who answered the IPCSS-Professor and sociodemographic questions. Exploratory analysis suggested a one-factor structure for both subscales. Respondents in Study 2 were 262 college professors (mean age = 41.80; SD = 9.81; 50.8 % male). Confirmatory factor analysis suggested the adequacy of the six-factor structure theoretically proposed for both subscales after comparison with the alternative single-factor model. The IPCSS-Professor presented satisfactory reliability indexes and it is applicable for teachers of different sectors in order to understand their character strengths.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document