scholarly journals Evaluation of an Algorithm to Guide Patients With Type 1 Diabetes Treated With Continuous Subcutaneous Insulin Infusion on How to Respond to Real-Time Continuous Glucose Levels: A randomized controlled trial

Diabetes Care ◽  
2010 ◽  
Vol 33 (6) ◽  
pp. 1242-1248 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. J. Jenkins ◽  
B. Krishnamurthy ◽  
J. D. Best ◽  
F. J. Cameron ◽  
P. G. Colman ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Randomized Controlled Trial ◽  
Type 1 Diabetes ◽  
Real Time ◽  
Continuous Subcutaneous Insulin Infusion ◽  
Insulin Infusion ◽  
Controlled Trial ◽  
Subcutaneous Insulin ◽  
Glucose Levels ◽  
Randomized Controlled

scholarly journals Practical Approach to Using Trend Arrows on Real-Time Continuous Glucose Monitoring System in Type 1 Diabetes Adolescents Living Camp Setting Treated With Multiple Daily Injection or Continuous Subcutaneous Insulin Infusion Insulin Therapy

2020 ◽  
pp. 193229682093480
Author(s):  
Marta Bassi ◽  
Nicola Minuto ◽  
Graziella Fichera ◽  
Clara Rebora ◽  
Alice Parodi ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Type 1 Diabetes ◽  
Real Time ◽  
Continuous Glucose Monitoring ◽  
Continuous Subcutaneous Insulin Infusion ◽  
Insulin Infusion ◽  
Training Session ◽  
Glucose Monitoring ◽  
Daily Injection ◽  
Subcutaneous Insulin

Background: The aim of the study was to determine the effect of an educational intervention on the use of trend arrows of a real-time continuous glucose monitoring (rt-CGM) to manage daily therapy decisions in a group of adolescents with type 1 diabetes attending a camp. The secondary aim was to evaluate the variations in total daily dose (TDD) of insulin requirement. Methods: Twenty patients (15-17 years) on multiple insulin injections ( n = 8) or continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion ( n = 12) attended a training session at the beginning of the camp to learn our algorithm for the management of therapy depending on trend arrows. TDD, time in range (TIR), time above range (TAR), and time below range (TBR) (in the 24 hours and in the three hours after breakfast) before the training session (run-in) and at the end of the camp (T1) were analyzed. Results: Data showed a reduction of TAR (run-in 42.6%, T1 32.05%, P = .036) and an increase in TIR (run-in 52.9%, T1 62.4%, P = .013). Reduction of TBR (run-in 42.5%, T1 37.5%, P = .05) and improvement in TIR (run-in 49.0%, T1 57.0%, P = .02) were also observed in the post-breakfast period. Data showed a significant reduction in the TDD (run-in 52.02 ± 17.44 U/die, T1 46.49 ± 12.39 U/die, P = .024). Conclusions: Statistically significant improvement of glycemic control and reduction of TTD were observed in all patients regardless of therapy type. The improvement between run-in and T1 demonstrates the importance of patients’ education on the correct use of rt-CGM with simple algorithms for the management of therapy.

scholarly journals Real-time CGM Is Superior to Flash Glucose Monitoring for Glucose Control in Type 1 Diabetes: The CORRIDA Randomized Controlled Trial

Diabetes Care ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 43 (11) ◽  
pp. 2744-2750
Author(s):  
Aneta Hásková ◽  
Lucie Radovnická ◽  
Lenka Petruželková ◽  
Christopher G. Parkin ◽  
George Grunberger ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Randomized Controlled Trial ◽  
Type 1 Diabetes ◽  
Real Time ◽  
Glucose Control ◽  
Controlled Trial ◽  
Glucose Monitoring ◽  
Flash Glucose Monitoring ◽  
Randomized Controlled
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document