User- and Health Care Provider–Reported Outcomes for a Wearable Bolus Insulin Delivery Patch

Diabetes ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 67 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 995-P
Author(s):  
MARK PEYROT ◽  
RICHARD M. BERGENSTAL ◽  
DARLENE M. DREON ◽  
VANITA ARODA ◽  
TIMOTHY S. BAILEY ◽  
...  
1993 ◽  
Vol 19 (1) ◽  
pp. 50-58 ◽  
Author(s):  
Suzanne M. Strowig

Insulin infusion pump therapy is a treatmertt option that facilitates achieving improved blood glucose control and lifestyle flexibility. These advantages are derived from the physiologic mode of insulin delivery and the pharmacologic advantages of using rapid-acting insulin. Patients who are sufficiently motivated and capable can learn to use the pump so that insulin adjustments can be made to compensate for changing circumstances. Although there are potential risks and side effects of using an insulin pump, these can be avoided through proper education and surveillance. The health care provider should be knowledgeable about the management of infusion pump therapy, including assessment of patient capabilities and practices, education, insulin adjustment, and techniques of use. The knowledge assists the health care provider in counseling patients to consider pump therapy and to manage patients already employing this mode of insulin delivery.


2019 ◽  
Vol 14 (6) ◽  
pp. 1017-1021 ◽  
Author(s):  
James A. Murray ◽  
Margaret F. Clayton ◽  
Michelle L. Litchman

Background: Automated insulin delivery (AID) technology may reduce variability in blood glucose, resulting in lower risk for hypoglycemia and associated complications, and by extension improve quality of life. While clinical trials, research, and patient experience have consistently demonstrated the value of AID, this technology is still inaccessible to many patients. Patient-driven innovation has resulted in alternative do-it-yourself (DIY) solutions to available off-the-shelf AID devices. Method: This two-phase cross-sectional observational study addressed health care provider (HCP) perceptions of AID as well as the perceived need for, development of, and evaluation of an AID fact sheet comparing the most commonly used Federal Drug Administration approved AID and DIY AID devices. Results: Negative attitudes toward the use of DIY AID were low. The majority of HCPs saw their lack of knowledge about how DIY AID work to be the greatest barrier to answering patient questions about what is available (74.4%). Additionally, the majority of HCPs (64.5%) indicated they were either “likely” or “very likely” to use the fact sheet when answering patient questions about AID options. Conclusion: Increased awareness and utilization of AID technology offer hope to further reduce the burden of diabetes, but there is a need to bridge the knowledge gap about DIY AID. A fact sheet provides a way to facilitate discussions of this emerging technology between HCPs and patients. Next steps could investigate additional ways to put needed information in the hands of HCPs.


2007 ◽  
Vol 177 (4S) ◽  
pp. 548-548
Author(s):  
Girish S. Kulkarni ◽  
Gina A. Lockwood ◽  
Andrew Evans ◽  
Arthy Saravanan ◽  
Michael A.S. Jewett ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 50 (2) ◽  
pp. xv-xvi
Author(s):  
M. Nedim Ince ◽  
David E. Elliott

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document