Comparing Patch vs. Pen Bolus Insulin Delivery in Type 2 Diabetes Using Continuous Glucose Monitoring Metrics and Profiles

Diabetes ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 67 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 73-LB
Author(s):  
MARY L. JOHNSON ◽  
DARLENE M. DREON ◽  
BRIAN L. LEVY ◽  
SARA RICHTER ◽  
DEBORAH MULLEN ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Type 2 Diabetes ◽  
Continuous Glucose Monitoring ◽  
Glucose Monitoring ◽  
Insulin Delivery ◽  
Bolus Insulin

scholarly journals The Effect of Discontinuing Continuous Glucose Monitoring in Adults with Type 2 Diabetes Treated with Basal Insulin

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Grazia Aleppo ◽  
Roy W. Beck ◽  
Ryan Bailey ◽  
Katrina J. Ruedy ◽  
Peter Calhoun ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Type 2 Diabetes ◽  
Real Time ◽  
Continuous Glucose Monitoring ◽  
Basal Insulin ◽  
Glucose Monitoring ◽  
Blood Glucose Monitoring ◽  
Time In Range ◽  
Bolus Insulin ◽  
Design And Methods

<b>Objective: </b>To explore the effect of discontinuing continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) after 8 months of CGM use in adults with type 2 diabetes treated with basal without bolus insulin. <p><b>Research Design and Methods:</b> Multi-center trial with an initial randomization to either real-time CGM or blood glucose monitoring (BGM) for 8 months, followed by 6 months in which the BGM Group continued to use BGM (N=57) and the CGM Group was re-randomized either to continue CGM (N=53) or discontinue CGM with resumption of BGM for glucose monitoring (N=53). </p> <p><b>Results: </b>In the group that discontinued CGM, mean time in range 70-180 mg/dL (TIR), which improved from 38% prior to initiating CGM to 62% after 8 months of CGM, decreased after discontinuing CGM to 50% at 14 months (mean change from 8 to 14 months = -12%, 95% CI -21% to -3%, P=0.01). In the group continuing CGM, there was little change in TIR from 8 to 14 months (baseline 44%, 8 months 56%, 14 months 57%; mean change 8 to 14 months = 1%, 95% CI -11% to 12%, P=0.89). Comparing the two groups at 14 months, the adjusted treatment group difference in mean TIR was -6% (95% CI -16% to 4%, P=0.20).</p> <p><b>Conclusions: </b>In adults with type 2 diabetes treated with basal insulin who had been using real-time CGM for 8 months, discontinuing CGM resulted in a loss of about half of the initial gain in TIR that had been achieved during CGM use.</p>

scholarly journals Hypoglycemia in type 2 diabetes patients treated with insulin: the advantages of continuous glucose monitoring

2014 ◽  
Vol 17 (1) ◽  
pp. 75-80 ◽  
Author(s):  
Vadim Valer'evich Klimontov ◽  
Alexander Ivanovich Tsiberkin ◽  
Olga Nikolaevna Fazullina ◽  
Marina Alekseevna Prudnikova ◽  
Nadezhda Viktorovna Tyan ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Type 2 Diabetes ◽  
Continuous Glucose Monitoring ◽  
Glucose Monitoring ◽  
Insulin Regimen ◽  
Premixed Insulin ◽  
Dipeptidyl Peptidase 4 ◽  
Retrospective Data Analysis ◽  
Dipeptidyl Peptidase 4 Inhibitors ◽  
Bolus Insulin

Aims.  To determine the incidence and risk factors for hypoglycemia in elderly insulin-treated type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) patients by means of continuous glucose monitoring (CGM). Materials and Methods.  We observed seventy-six hospitalized patients with T2DM, aged 65 to 79 years. Treatment with basal insulin (n=36), premixed insulin (n=12) or basal-bolus insulin regimen (n=28) was followed by metformin (n=44), glimepiride (n=14) and dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitors (n=14). 2-days CGM with retrospective data analysis was performed in all patients. During CGM, three fasting and three 2-h postprandial finger-prick glucose values were obtained daily with portable glucose meter. Results.  Hypoglycemia (identified as blood glucose

scholarly journals The Effect of Discontinuing Continuous Glucose Monitoring in Adults with Type 2 Diabetes Treated with Basal Insulin

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Grazia Aleppo ◽  
Roy W. Beck ◽  
Ryan Bailey ◽  
Katrina J. Ruedy ◽  
Peter Calhoun ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Type 2 Diabetes ◽  
Real Time ◽  
Continuous Glucose Monitoring ◽  
Basal Insulin ◽  
Glucose Monitoring ◽  
Blood Glucose Monitoring ◽  
Time In Range ◽  
Bolus Insulin ◽  
Design And Methods

<b>Objective: </b>To explore the effect of discontinuing continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) after 8 months of CGM use in adults with type 2 diabetes treated with basal without bolus insulin. <p><b>Research Design and Methods:</b> Multi-center trial with an initial randomization to either real-time CGM or blood glucose monitoring (BGM) for 8 months, followed by 6 months in which the BGM Group continued to use BGM (N=57) and the CGM Group was re-randomized either to continue CGM (N=53) or discontinue CGM with resumption of BGM for glucose monitoring (N=53). </p> <p><b>Results: </b>In the group that discontinued CGM, mean time in range 70-180 mg/dL (TIR), which improved from 38% prior to initiating CGM to 62% after 8 months of CGM, decreased after discontinuing CGM to 50% at 14 months (mean change from 8 to 14 months = -12%, 95% CI -21% to -3%, P=0.01). In the group continuing CGM, there was little change in TIR from 8 to 14 months (baseline 44%, 8 months 56%, 14 months 57%; mean change 8 to 14 months = 1%, 95% CI -11% to 12%, P=0.89). Comparing the two groups at 14 months, the adjusted treatment group difference in mean TIR was -6% (95% CI -16% to 4%, P=0.20).</p> <p><b>Conclusions: </b>In adults with type 2 diabetes treated with basal insulin who had been using real-time CGM for 8 months, discontinuing CGM resulted in a loss of about half of the initial gain in TIR that had been achieved during CGM use.</p>

Comparing Patch vs Pen Bolus Insulin Delivery in Type 2 Diabetes Using Continuous Glucose Monitoring Metrics and Profiles

2021 ◽  
pp. 193229682110165
Author(s):  
Richard M. Bergenstal ◽  
Mary L. Johnson ◽  
Venita R. Aroda ◽  
Ronald L. Brazg ◽  
Darlene M. Dreon ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Type 2 Diabetes ◽  
Insulin Therapy ◽  
Continuous Glucose Monitoring ◽  
Glucose Monitoring ◽  
Insulin Delivery ◽  
Baseline Period ◽  
International Consensus ◽  
Insulin Requirements ◽  
Mealtime Insulin

Objective: CeQur Simplicity™ (CeQur, Marlborough, MA) is a 3-day insulin delivery patch designed to meet mealtime insulin requirements. A recently reported 48-week, randomized, multicenter, interventional trial compared efficacy, safety and self-reported outcomes in 278 adults with type 2 diabetes (T2D) on basal insulin therapy who initiated and managed mealtime insulin therapy with a patch pump versus insulin pen. We assessed changes in key glycemic metrics among a subset of patients who wore a continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) device. Methods: Study participants (patch, n = 49; pen, n = 48) wore a CGM device in masked setting during the baseline period and prior to week 24. Glycemic control was assessed using international consensus guidelines for percentage of Time In Range (%TIR: >70% at 70-180 mg/dL), Time Below Range (%TBR: <4% at <70 mg/dL; <1% at <54 mg/dL), and Time Above Range (%TAR: <25% at >180 mg/dL; <5% at >250 mg/dL). Results: Both the patch and pen groups achieved recommended targets in %TIR (74.1% ± 18.7%, 75.2 ± 16.1%, respectively) and marked reductions in %TAR >180 mg/dL (21.1% ± 19.9%, 19.7% ± 17.5%, respectively) but with increased %TBR <70 mg/dL (4.7% ± 5.2%, 5.1 ± 5.8, respectively), all P < .0001. No significant between-group differences in glycemic improvements or adverse events were observed. Conclusions: CGM confirmed that the patch or pen can be used to safely initiate and optimize basal-bolus therapy using a simple insulin adjustment algorithm with SMBG. Preference data suggest that use of the patch vs pen may enhance treatment adherence.

973-P: The Feasibility of Continuous Glucose Monitoring in Youth with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus: A Pilot Study

Diabetes ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 68 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 973-P
Author(s):  
ALLISON LAROCHE ◽  
KRISTINA UTZSCHNEIDER ◽  
CATHERINE PIHOKER
Keyword(s):  
Diabetes Mellitus ◽  
Type 2 Diabetes ◽  
Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus ◽  
Pilot Study ◽  
Continuous Glucose Monitoring ◽  
Glucose Monitoring
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document