Improving Quality of the Informed Consent Process—Developing an Easy-to-Read, Multimodal, Patient-Centered Format in Diabetes Research

Diabetes ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 67 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 48-LB
Author(s):  
KAREN LINDSLEY
Hypatia ◽  
1997 ◽  
Vol 12 (2) ◽  
pp. 165-184
Author(s):  
Leslie Cannold

Feminist health activists and medical researchers frequently disagree on the adequacy of the informed consent processes in clinical trials. I argue for an informed consent process that reflects the central importance of patient-participant autonomy. Such a standard may raise concerns for medical researchers about their capacity to control the quantity and quality of the information they disclose to potential participants. These difficulties might be addressed by presenting potential participants with differently sized disclosure packages.


2015 ◽  
Vol 9 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Julie Guinand ◽  
Christophe Gapany ◽  
Jeanne-Pascale Simon ◽  
Jean-Blaise Wasserfallen ◽  
Jean-Marc Joseph

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Shu Yu Chen ◽  
Shu-Chen Susan Chang ◽  
Chiu-Chu Lin ◽  
Qingqing Lou ◽  
Robert M. Anderson

Author(s):  
Miraida Morales ◽  
Sarah Barriage

This poster presents a pilot study that analyzed a small corpus of informed consent forms used in research with children, adolescents, and adult early readers using Coh-Metrix, a readability measurement tool. Recommendations for increasing readability of consent forms in order to improve the informed consent process are also provided. Cette affiche présente une étude pilote qui a analysé un corpus restreint de formulaires de consentement éclairé utilisés dans la recherche avec les enfants, les adolescents et les lecteurs précoces adultes,  utilisant Coh-Metrix, un outil de mesure de la lisibilité. Nous fournissons également des recommandations pour augmenter la lisibilité des formulaires de consentement afin d'améliorer le processus de consentement éclairé.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document