Initiating Basal Insulin Supported Oral Therapy (BOT) with Insulin Glargine 300 U/mL (Gla-300) Improves Glycemic Control in Patients (Pts) with Type 2 Diabetes (T2DM) without Increasing Hypoglycemia Risk

Diabetes ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 67 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 1027-P
Author(s):  
MARTIN PFOHL ◽  
ANDREAS FRITSCHE ◽  
HELMUT ANDERTEN ◽  
KATRIN PEGELOW ◽  
STEFAN PSCHERER ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Type 2 Diabetes ◽  
Glycemic Control ◽  
Insulin Glargine ◽  
Basal Insulin ◽  
Oral Therapy

Switching to Insulin Glargine 300 U/mL (Gla-300) Improves Glycemic Control and Reduces Nocturnal Hypoglycemia in Patients (Pts) with Type 2 Diabetes (T2DM) on Basal Insulin Supported Oral Therapy (BOT)

Diabetes ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 67 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 1020-P ◽  
Author(s):  
JOCHEN SEUFERT ◽  
ANDREAS FRITSCHE ◽  
HELMUT ANDERTEN ◽  
KATRIN PEGELOW ◽  
STEFAN PSCHERER ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Type 2 Diabetes ◽  
Glycemic Control ◽  
Insulin Glargine ◽  
Basal Insulin ◽  
Oral Therapy ◽  
Nocturnal Hypoglycemia

scholarly journals A Randomized Trial of Insulin Glargine plus Oral Hypoglycemic Agents versus Continuous Subcutaneous Insulin Infusion to Treat Newly Diagnosed Type 2 Diabetes

2018 ◽  
Vol 2018 ◽  
pp. 1-9
Author(s):  
Shuo Lin ◽  
Mu Chen ◽  
Wanling Chen ◽  
Keyi Lin ◽  
Panwei Mu ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Type 2 Diabetes ◽  
Glycemic Control ◽  
Insulin Glargine ◽  
Basal Insulin ◽  
Insulin Infusion ◽  
Cell Function ◽  
Hypoglycemic Agents ◽  
Newly Diagnosed ◽  
Oral Hypoglycemic Agents

Aims. Basal insulin plus oral hypoglycemic agents (OHAs) has not been investigated for early intensive antihyperglycemic treatment in people with newly diagnosed type 2 diabetes. This study is aimed at comparing the short-term (over a period of 12 days) effects of basal insulin glargine plus OHAs and continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion (CSII) on glycemic control and beta-cell function in this setting. Methods. An open-label parallel-group study. Newly diagnosed hospitalized patients with type 2 diabetes and fasting plasma glucose (FPG) ≥11.1 mmol/L or glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) ≥9% (75 mmol/mol) were randomized to CSII or insulin glargine in combination with metformin and gliclazide. The primary outcome measure was the mean amplitude of glycemic excursions (MAGE), and secondary endpoints included time to reach glycemic control target (FPG < 7 mmol/L and 2-hour postprandial plasma glucose < 10 mmol/L), markers of β-cell function, and hypoglycemia. Results. Subjects in the CSII (n=35) and basal insulin plus OHA (n=33) groups had a similar significant reduction from baseline to end of treatment in glycated albumin (−6.44 ± 3.23% and− 6.42 ± 3.56%, P=0.970). Groups A and B have comparable time to glycemic control (3.6 ± 1.2 days and 4.0 ± 1.4 days), MAGE (3.40 ± 1.40 mmol/L vs. 3.16 ± 1.38 mmol/L; p=0.484), and 24-hour mean blood glucose (7.49 ± 0.96 mmol/L vs. 7.02 ± 1.03 mmol/L). Changes in the C-peptide reactivity index, the secretory unit of islet in transplantation index, and insulin secretion-sensitivity index-2 indicated a greater β-cell function improvement with basal insulin plus OHAs versus CSII. Conclusions. Short-term insulin glargine plus OHAs may be an alternative to CSII for initial intensive therapy in people with newly diagnosed type 2 diabetes.

scholarly journals Treatment of Type 1 and Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus with Insulin Detemir, a Long-Acting Insulin Analog

2010 ◽  
Vol 3 ◽  
pp. CMED.S5330 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jason R. Young ◽  
Carrie Mcadam-Marx
Keyword(s):  
Type 2 Diabetes ◽  
Weight Gain ◽  
Glycemic Control ◽  
Insulin Glargine ◽  
Basal Insulin ◽  
Insulin Detemir ◽  
Nph Insulin ◽  
Long Acting

Insulin detemir is a long-acting basal insulin approved for use in patients with type 1 (T1DM) or type 2 diabetes (T2DM). Insulin detemir has demonstrated equivalent glycemic control and hypoglycemic risk when compared to insulin glargine, and insulin detemir has generally but not consistently demonstrated less weight gain than insulin glargine in T2DM. The benefits of basal insulin analogs relative to NPH insulin are well recognized, including less FBG variability, lower risk of hypoglycemia, and less weight gain specifically with insulin detemir. However, NPH insulin continues to be widely prescribed, which may be due in part to economic considerations. While NPH insulin generally costs less per prescription, insulin detemir has been shown to be cost effective compared to NPH insulin as well as insulin glargine. Therefore, insulin detemir is an effective option from both clinical and economic perspectives for patients with T1DM or T2DM who require basal insulin to achieve glycemic control.

Continuous Glucose Monitoring and Glycemic Control in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes Treated With Basal Insulin

JAMA ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 326 (13) ◽  
pp. 1330
Author(s):  
Wellbert Hernández-Núñez ◽  
Jesús Zacarías Villareal-Pérez ◽  
René Rodríguez-Gutiérrez
Keyword(s):  
Type 2 Diabetes ◽  
Glycemic Control ◽  
Continuous Glucose Monitoring ◽  
Basal Insulin ◽  
Glucose Monitoring
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document