Multiple Organ Dysfunction Syndrome

2015 ◽  
Author(s):  
Vishal Bansal ◽  
Jay Doucet

The concept of and approach to multiple organ dysfunction syndrome (MODS), also known as progressive systems failure, multiple organ failure, and multiple system organ failure, have evolved over the last decade. Characterized by progressive but potentially reversible tissue damage and dysfunction of two or more organ systems that arise after a significant physiologic insult and its subsequent management, MODS evolves in the wake of a profound disruption of systemic homeostasis. Pre-existing illness, nutritional status, hospital course, and genetic variation all lead to the development of organ dysfunction in patients exposed to these risk factors. The ultimate outcome from MODS is influenced not only by a patient’s genetic and biological predisposition but also by specific management principles practiced by intensivists. This review details the clinical definitions, quantification, prevention, evaluation, support, and outcomes of organ dysfunction. A figure shows the increasing severity of organ dysfunction correlated with increasing intensive care unit mortality, and an algorithm details the approach to MODS. Tables list risk factors and prognosis for MODS, the multiple organ dysfunction (MOD) score, the sequential organ failure assessment (SOFA) score, intensive care unit interventions that reduce mortality or attenuate organ dysfunction along with unproven or disproven ICU interventions, and the temporal evolution of MODS. This review contains 1 figure, 7 tables, and 159 references.

2015 ◽  
Author(s):  
Vishal Bansal ◽  
Jay Doucet

The concept of and approach to multiple organ dysfunction syndrome (MODS), also known as progressive systems failure, multiple organ failure, and multiple system organ failure, have evolved over the last decade. Characterized by progressive but potentially reversible tissue damage and dysfunction of two or more organ systems that arise after a significant physiologic insult and its subsequent management, MODS evolves in the wake of a profound disruption of systemic homeostasis. Pre-existing illness, nutritional status, hospital course, and genetic variation all lead to the development of organ dysfunction in patients exposed to these risk factors. The ultimate outcome from MODS is influenced not only by a patient’s genetic and biological predisposition but also by specific management principles practiced by intensivists. This review details the clinical definitions, quantification, prevention, evaluation, support, and outcomes of organ dysfunction. A figure shows the increasing severity of organ dysfunction correlated with increasing intensive care unit mortality, and an algorithm details the approach to MODS. Tables list risk factors and prognosis for MODS, the multiple organ dysfunction (MOD) score, the sequential organ failure assessment (SOFA) score, intensive care unit interventions that reduce mortality or attenuate organ dysfunction along with unproven or disproven ICU interventions, and the temporal evolution of MODS. This review contains 1 figure, 7 tables, and 159 references.


2015 ◽  
Author(s):  
Vishal Bansal ◽  
Jay Doucet

The concept of and approach to multiple organ dysfunction syndrome (MODS), also known as progressive systems failure, multiple organ failure, and multiple system organ failure, have evolved over the last decade. Characterized by progressive but potentially reversible tissue damage and dysfunction of two or more organ systems that arise after a significant physiologic insult and its subsequent management, MODS evolves in the wake of a profound disruption of systemic homeostasis. Pre-existing illness, nutritional status, hospital course, and genetic variation all lead to the development of organ dysfunction in patients exposed to these risk factors. The ultimate outcome from MODS is influenced not only by a patient’s genetic and biological predisposition but also by specific management principles practiced by intensivists. This review details the clinical definitions, quantification, prevention, evaluation, support, and outcomes of organ dysfunction. A figure shows the increasing severity of organ dysfunction correlated with increasing intensive care unit mortality, and an algorithm details the approach to MODS. Tables list risk factors and prognosis for MODS, the multiple organ dysfunction (MOD) score, the sequential organ failure assessment (SOFA) score, intensive care unit interventions that reduce mortality or attenuate organ dysfunction along with unproven or disproven ICU interventions, and the temporal evolution of MODS. This review contains 1 figure, 7 tables, and 159 references.


Medicina ◽  
2010 ◽  
Vol 46 (8) ◽  
pp. 511 ◽  
Author(s):  
Birutė Pundzienė ◽  
Diana Dobilienė ◽  
Šarūnas Rudaitis

The aim of our study was to determine the causes of acute kidney injury (AKI) in children, to compare outcomes between two periods – 1998–2003 and 2004-2008 – and to evaluate the influence of new methods of renal replacement therapy on mortality. Material and methods. A retrospective analysis of medical record data of all children treated for AKI at the Clinic of Children Diseases, Hospital of Kaunas University of Medicine, during the period of 1998–2008 was made. Both periods were compared regarding various variables. Results. Of the 179 children with AKI, 75 (41.9%) were treated during 1998–2003 and 104 (58.1%) during 2004–2008. Primary glomerular disease and sepsis were the leading causes of AKI in both the periods. AKI without involvement of other organs was diagnosed for 106 (59.2%) children: for 42 (56.0%) children in the first period and 64 (61.5%) in the second. A total of 124 (69.3%) children were treated in a pediatric intensive care unit. Multiple organ dysfunction syndrome with AKI was diagnosed for 33 (44%) patients in the first period and for 40 (38.5%) in the second. A significant decrease in mortality among patients with multiple organ dysfunction syndrome during the second period was observed (78.8% vs. 37.5%). Conclusions. More than half of patients had secondary acute kidney injury of nonrenal origin. More than two-thirds (69.3%) of patients with AKI were treated in the pediatric intensive care unit. Multiple organ dysfunction syndrome was diagnosed for 40.8% of children with AKI. Renal replacement therapy was indicated for one-third of patients with AKI. A 2.5-fold decrease in mortality was observed in the second period as compared to the first one.


2021 ◽  
Vol 17 (2) ◽  
pp. 34-41
Author(s):  
L.O. Maltseva ◽  
V.M. Lisnycha ◽  
Yu.Yu. Kobelatskyy ◽  
N.A. Kazimirova

Background. Sepsis as the response to an infection includes such a developmental stage as multiple organ dysfunction syndrome. In 70 % of cases, cerebral dysfunction is one of the first symptoms of sepsis-associated multiple organ dysfunction syndrome before clinical manifestations in other life support systems. Sepsis-associated encephalopathy is a multifocal dysfunction of the brain in the presence of an infection, accompanied by manifestations of systemic inflammation, but without clinical and laboratory evidence of a direct involvement of the infection in brain damage. Depending on the criteria on which the diagnosis is based, cerebral dysfunction-insufficiency can be detected in all patients with sepsis. The degree of its severity correlates with an increase in the severity of the septic process. Sepsis-associated dysfunction-failure may be an independent predictor of morta­lity. The severity of cerebral dysfunction-failure ranges from lethargy and/or disorientation to coma. The purpose was to study the effect of the main provisions of the International Guidelines for Ma­nagement of Sepsis and Septic Shock: 2016 with additional neuroprotection with Gliatilin on the course of the septic process and the severity of encephalopathy in the structure of multiple organ dysfunction syndrome. Materials and methods. In 2010–2015, we conducted a controlled prospective randomized cohort study at the clinical base of the Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care of the State Institution “Dnipropetrovsk Medical Academy of the Ministry of Health of Ukraine” and the Department of Intensive Care of Sepsis at Mechnikov Dnipropetrovsk Regional Clinical Hospital. The study included 22 patients. All of them underwent routine laboratory tests to determine the level of clinical and biochemical markers of systemic inflammation and organ dysfunction according to the Sequential Organ Failure Assessment score and Lausanne Intestinal Failure Estimation. The Glasgow Coma Scale was used to assess the level of consciousness. The concentration of cytokines (tumor necrosis factor α, interleukins 1, 4, interferon α) in the blood serum was studied by the enzyme immunoassay. Basic intensive care was carried out using the main provisions of the International Guidelines for Management of Sepsis and Septic Shock: 2016 with the additional use of the neuroprotective drug Gliatilin (choline alfoscerate) — 1,000–3,000 mg/day, which is dissolved in 0.9% sodium chloride solution, for 5–10 days. The study of indicators was carried out in four stages, on days 1, 3, 5, 7. Results. Summarizing the results of the study, we can say that on the fifth and seventh days, there were no clinical manifestations of the systemic inflammatory response syndrome in more than 75 % of patients; the severity of the condition according to Acute Physiology And Chronic Health Evaluation II system decreased by 72.5 and 74.5 % (p < 0.001) and the severity of the syndrome of multiple organ failure according to Sequential Organ Failure Assessment score decreased 9 times (p < 0.001), according to the stages of the study. Cerebral insufficiency assessed by the Glasgow Coma Scale was 15 points on the fifth and seventh days of the study, which corresponded to the level of clear consciousness in more than 75 % of patients. The above was observed against the background of a trend towards balanced activity of pro-inflammatory and anti-inflammatory links of the cytokine system, as evidenced by the maximum levels of tumor necrosis factor α and interferon α on the fifth day of observation with a decrease in the concentration of interleukin 1 by 55.8 % compared to baseline. The predicted mortality in patients of the second group was 51 %, the actual mortality was 7.5 %. So, carrying out this intensive care helped reduce the estimated mortality by 43.5 %.


2018 ◽  
Vol 15 (3) ◽  
pp. 222-227
Author(s):  
Leison Maharjan ◽  
Aarzoo Shah ◽  
Uday Bajracharya ◽  
Gambhir Shrestha

Background: Multiple organ failure is recognized as the final pathway preceding majority of deaths in intensive care unit. This study aims to find out the prevalence of organ dysfunctions/ failures in patients at the time of their demise irrespective of the underlying diseases in a tertiary care hospital. Methods: This study was done in medical intensive care unit of Blue Cross Hospital. Medical records of all deceased patients in two years period were thoroughly reviewed retrospectively. Status of six organ systems was categorized into five sub-groups: No organ dysfunction, Mild organ dysfunction, Acute organ failure, Acute-on-chronic organ failure, and Chronic organ failure. The proportion of organ dysfunction involved was analyzed along with other variables.Results: Among 204 deaths, majority 165 (80.9%) had Multiple Organ Dysfunction Syndrome. Circulatory system was most affected system with “acute organ failure” 134 (65.5%) followed by acute respiratory failure 128 (62.7%), and acute neurologic failure 114 (55.8%). Neurologic system was most affected with “mild organ dysfunction” 47 (23%) followed by Respiratory system and Renal system. Of the patients who had chronic organ failures at the time of admission, 72 (81.8%) developed “acute-on-chronic failures”.Conclusions: Multiple Organ Dysfunction Syndrome was present in the majority of deaths in critically ill patients. Most common acutely failed organ was the circulatory system.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document