Male Infertility: Surgical Treatment (Varicocele, Microsurgical Reconstruction, TUR Ejaculatory Ducts)

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Vanessa L. Dudley ◽  
Marc Goldstein
Keyword(s):  
Intrauterine Insemination ◽  
Ejaculatory Duct ◽  
Obstructive Azoospermia ◽  
Male Factor Infertility ◽  
Nonobstructive Azoospermia ◽  
Male Factor ◽  
Sperm Retrieval ◽  
Donor Sperm ◽  
Vitro Fertilization

Male factor infertility contributes to at least half of all cases of infertility in couples. The most common causes of male factor infertility are impaired sperm production due to varicoceles, obstruction of the ductal system, and genetic defects causing nonobstructive azoospermia. A majority of these underlying conditions are treatable. Even when in vitro fertilization with intracytoplasmic sperm injection (IVF-ICSI) is necessary, treatment of men has been shown to improve the outcomes of IVF-ICSI and potentially increase the chances of finding sperm with microdissection sperm extraction in some cases of nonobstructive azoospermia. Important advances in the field include abundant evidence now supporting microsurgical repair of varicocele in varicocele-associated nonobstructive azoospermia prior to IVF-ICSI or attempted surgical sperm retrieval. Advances in techniques for reconstruction of obstruction is dependent on the surgeon’s skill in creating a tension-free and leak-proof mucosa-to-mucosa accurate approximation with a good blood supply and healthy mucosa and muscularis and can result in higher patency rates. Treating the men often allows upgrading men from being solely candidates for donor sperm or adoption to candidates for ICF-ICSI with surgically retrieved testicular sperm to allowing IVF-ICSI with ejaculated sperm and from IVF-ICSI with ejaculated sperm to allowing the simpler intrauterine insemination and, finally, the possibility of a naturally conceived pregnancy. This review contains 27 figures, 1 table, and 69 references. Key Words: microsurgery, obstructive azoospermia, transurethral resection of the ejaculatory duct, varicocele, vasectomy reversal, vasoepididymostomy, vasography, vasovasostomy

A modern view of male infertility

1994 ◽  
Vol 6 (1) ◽  
pp. 93 ◽  
Author(s):  
SJ Silber
Keyword(s):  
Male Infertility ◽  
Y Chromosome ◽  
Obstructive Azoospermia ◽  
Male Factor Infertility ◽  
Male Factor ◽  
Sperm Retrieval ◽  
Modern Approach ◽  
Vitro Fertilization ◽  
Defective Spermatogenesis

It is archaic to view male factor infertility today separately from in vitro fertilization (IVF) and treatment of the female partner. Oligoasthenozoospermia may be an inherited condition (most likely on the Y chromosome), and is refractory to any treatment of the male including hormones and varicocelectomy. IVF technology is the only justifiable approach for achieving a pregnancy in these couples. The reasons for this view and the suggested modern approach to couples with oligoasthenozoospermia are outlined in this review. However, obstructive azoospermia is different as it can be successfully corrected with microsurgery in over 90% of men. When it cannot be corrected, as in congenital absence of vas, microsurgical sperm retrieval combined with IVF can still be highly effective in producing pregnancy with sperm from the husband. The most important arena for research into male infertility in the next decade will be to map out the deletions on the Y chromosome that might result in defective spermatogenesis, and which probably cause most cases of non-obstructive male factor infertility.

Sperm Retrieval in the Obstructive, Nonobstructive Azoospermic and Aspermic Patients

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ryan Flannigan ◽  
Peter N. Schlegel ◽  
E. Darracott Vaughan Jr.
Keyword(s):  
Key Words ◽  
Testicular Biopsy ◽  
Obstructive Azoospermia ◽  
Male Factor Infertility ◽  
Nonobstructive Azoospermia ◽  
Male Factor ◽  
Sperm Retrieval ◽  
Diagnostic Investigation ◽  
Work Up ◽  
Defective Spermatogenesis

Sperm retrieval includes essential procedures in the treatment and management of male factor infertility. Appropriate diagnostic investigation is necessary to correctly identify the etiology of azoospermia among obstructive, nonobstructive (defective spermatogenesis), and aspermia. In this chapter, we discuss the necessary work-up of an individual presenting with azoospermia along with the relevant medical and surgical management to optimize success with surgical sperm retrieval. This review contains 7 figures, 2 tables, and 68 references.  Key Words: anejaculation, azoospermia, MESA, microTESE, nonobstructive azoospermia, obstructive azoospermia, PESA, TESE, testicular biopsy

scholarly journals Sperm Selection Procedures for Optimizing the Outcome of ICSI in Patients with NOA

2021 ◽  
Vol 10 (12) ◽  
pp. 2687
Author(s):  
Kaan Aydos ◽  
Oya Sena Aydos
Keyword(s):  
In Vitro Selection ◽  
Assisted Reproductive Technologies ◽  
Reproductive Technologies ◽  
Testicular Sperm Extraction ◽  
Obstructive Azoospermia ◽  
Sperm Retrieval ◽  
Vitro Fertilization ◽  
Great Hope ◽  
Future Fertility

Retrieving spermatozoa from the testicles has been a great hope for patients with non-obstructive azoospermia (NOA), but relevant methods have not yet been developed to the level necessary to provide resolutions for all cases of NOA. Although performing testicular sperm extraction under microscopic magnification has increased sperm retrieval rates, in vitro selection and processing of quality sperm plays an essential role in the success of in vitro fertilization. Moreover, sperm cryopreservation is widely used in assisted reproductive technologies, whether for therapeutic purposes or for future fertility preservation. In recent years, there have been new developments using advanced technologies to freeze and preserve even very small numbers of sperm for which conventional techniques are inadequate. The present review provides an up-to-date summary of current strategies for maximizing sperm recovery from surgically obtained testicular samples and, as an extension, optimization of in vitro sperm processing techniques in the management of NOA.

scholarly journals Post-wash total motile sperm count a useful predictor in the decision to perform IVF/ICSI in patients with non-male factor infertility

2020 ◽  
Vol 3 (2) ◽  
pp. 99-106
Author(s):  
Sara Mahmood Qureshi ◽  
Salma Kafeel ◽  
Riffat Bibi ◽  
Jawad Mohmand
Keyword(s):  
Sperm Quality ◽  
Sperm Count ◽  
Adverse Outcomes ◽  
Male Factor Infertility ◽  
Motile Sperm ◽  
Operating Characteristics ◽  
Male Factor ◽  
Vitro Fertilization ◽  
Total Motile Sperm Count

Introduction: The unrestricted use of intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) for non-male factor infertility is associated with adverse outcomes. Post-wash total motile sperm count (PW-TMSC) offers prognostic value to assess sperm quality and aid in the decision to perform in vitro fertilization (IVF) or ICSI. Objectives: The aim of this study was to identify the effect of PW-TMSC on fertilization rates in patients undergoing IVF cycles exclusively with non-male factor infertility. It also aimed to identify whether unnecessary ICSI could be avoided in such cases, thus maximizing optimal outcomes. Materials & Methods: We retrospectively analyzed age, semen volume, prewash TMSC, and PW-TMSC in 68 conventional IVF cycles of infertile couples with non-male factor infertility. Clinical characteristics including female age, number of follicles, level of estradiol on trigger day, mature cumulus-oocyte complexes (COCs) collected, were also included. Results: Incidence of <30% fertilization was significantly higher in the 4-<10 Million group compared with the ≥20 Million post-wash TMSC group (P<0.001). Furthermore, Receiver operating characteristics (ROC) analysis revealed post-wash TMSC as a significant predictor (P<0.05) of total failed fertilization (TFF) and of ≥30% fertilization (P<0.05) with area under curve (AUC) of 0. 79 and 0.77, respectively, with a deemed cutoff of 10.89 Million. Conclusion: Post-wash TMSC is a good predictor of fertilization; it can help in avoiding potentially low or even total fertilization failure (TFF). A cut-off point of 10.89 Million or less should warrant the use of ICSI.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document