Management of Speech and Swallowing Disorders in Children with Oral Clefts

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ravi K. Garg ◽  
Delora L Mount
Keyword(s):  
Cleft Palate ◽  
Cleft Lip ◽  
Speech Therapy ◽  
Cleft Lip And Palate ◽  
Treatment Options ◽  
Posterior Pharyngeal Wall ◽  
Diagnostic Tools ◽  
Pharyngeal Wall ◽  
Pharyngeal Flap ◽  
Sphincter Pharyngoplasty

Cleft lip and palate are common congenital anomalies with significant implications for feeding, swallowing, and speech. If a cleft palate goes unrepaired, a child will have difficulty distinguishing nasal and oral sounds. Even following cleft palate repair, approximately 20 to 30% of nonsyndromic children have persistent hypernasal speech. This often occurs due to velopharyngeal dysfunction (VPD), a term describing failure of the soft palate and pharyngeal walls to seal the nasopharynx from the oropharynx during oral consonant production. The gold standard for diagnosis is perceptual examination by a trained speech pathologist, although additional diagnostic tools such as nasendoscopy are often used. Treatment options for VPD range from speech therapy to revision palatoplasty, sphincter pharyngoplasty, pharyngeal flap, and pharyngeal wall augmentation. Palatal prosthetics may also be considered for children who are not surgical candidates. Further research is needed to improve selection of diagnostic and treatment interventions and optimize speech outcomes for children with a history of oral cleft. This review contains 1 figure, 3 videos, and 58 references.  Key words: Cleft lip and palate, hypernasal resonance, levator veli palatine, nasal emission, nasendoscopy, palatoplasty, pharyngeal flap, posterior pharyngeal wall augmentation, sphincter pharyngoplasty, velopharyngeal dysfunction

Perceptual Speech Outcomes After Early Primary Palatal Repair in Ugandan Patients With Cleft Palate

2020 ◽  
pp. 105566562098024
Author(s):  
Kim Bettens ◽  
Laura Bruneel ◽  
Cassandra Alighieri ◽  
Daniel Sseremba ◽  
Duncan Musasizib ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cleft Palate ◽  
Cleft Lip ◽  
Speech Therapy ◽  
Cleft Lip And Palate ◽  
Control Group ◽  
English Speaking ◽  
And Gender ◽  
Early Primary ◽  
Velopharyngeal Function ◽  
Normal Speech

Objective: To provide speech outcomes of English-speaking Ugandan patients with a cleft palate with or without cleft lip (CP±L). Design: Prospective case–control study. Setting: Referral hospital for patients with cleft lip and palate in Uganda. Participants: Twenty-four English-speaking Ugandan children with a CP±L (15 boys, 9 girls, mean 8.4 years) who received palatal closure prior to 6 months of age and an age- and gender-matched control group of Ugandan children without cleft palate. Interventions: Comparison of speech outcomes of the patient and control group. Main Outcome Measures: Perceptual speech outcomes including articulation, resonance, speech understandability and acceptability, and velopharyngeal composite score (VPC-sum). Information regarding speech therapy, fistula rate, and secondary surgery. Results: Normal speech understandability was observed in 42% of the patients, and 38% were judged with normal speech acceptability. Only 16% showed compensatory articulation. Acceptable resonance was found in 71%, and 75% of the patients were judged perceptually to present with competent velopharyngeal function based on the VPC-sum. Additional speech intervention was recommended in 25% of the patients. Statistically significant differences for all these variables were still observed with the control children ( P < .05). Conclusions: Overall, acceptable speech outcomes were found after early primary palatal closure. Comparable or even better results were found in comparison with international benchmarks, especially regarding the presence of compensatory articulation. Whether this approach is transferable to Western countries is the subject for further research.

Objective, Noninvasive Evaluation of Velopharyngeal Function in Cleft and Noncleft Patients

1998 ◽  
Vol 35 (1) ◽  
pp. 35-39 ◽  
Author(s):  
Martin Kunkel ◽  
Ulrich Wahlmann ◽  
Wilfried Wagner
Keyword(s):  
Cleft Palate ◽  
Cleft Lip ◽  
Cleft Lip And Palate ◽  
Noninvasive Evaluation ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Pharyngeal Muscles ◽  
Pharyngeal Flap ◽  
The Difference ◽  
Acoustic Pharyngometry ◽  
Velopharyngeal Function

Objective The purpose of this study was to investigate a new diagnostic method that provides an approach to noninvasive, objective measurement of velopharyngeal movement by acoustic determination of epipharyngeal volume changes with velopharyngeal muscle function. Design This was a case control study, using consecutive samples. Setting This study took place at the Cleft Palate Rehabilitation Center of the University of Mainz, Germany. Patients Subjects were 29 consecutive cleft lip and palate (CLP) patients and 31 controls (21 patients with dysgnathia and 10 healthy volunteers). Intervention A series of transnasal acoustic measurements (pressure wave: 55 dB for 2 milliseconds) of epipharyngeal volume were performed with the pharyngeal muscles relaxed in end-expiration and while the velopharyngeal orifice was closed, with the difference in volume representing maximal pharyngeal movement. Results Cleft palate patients yielded significantly lower values of velopharyngeal movement (6.5 cm3) than did the control group (8.0 cm3)(p < .05; Mann-Whitney U test). Overlapping ranges of values were measured for the C(L)P and control groups. The least mobility (4.75 cm3) was measured in patients who had undergone pharyngeal flap surgery. Different patterns of restriction were observed in patients with and without a pharyngeal flap. Conclusion Acoustic pharyngometry may provide access to noninvasive quantitative measurement of velopharyngeal movement and a better understanding of the pattern of movement in C(L)P-patients. We expect it to be a helpful tool in objectively monitoring the progress of logopedic therapy.

Genetics of cleft lip and palate revisited

2003 ◽  
Vol 27 (4) ◽  
pp. 311-320 ◽  
Author(s):  
Puneet Batra ◽  
Ritu Duggal ◽  
Hari Parkash
Keyword(s):  
Cleft Palate ◽  
Cleft Lip ◽  
Speech Therapy ◽  
Cleft Lip And Palate ◽  
Gene List ◽  
Complex Trait ◽  
Case Control Studies ◽  
Systematic Screening ◽  
Complex Interactions ◽  
Facial Development

Cleft lip with or without cleft palate (CL/CP) is one of the most common structural birth defects, with treatment including multiple surgeries, speech therapy, and dental and orthodontic treatments over the first 18 years of life. Providing care for these patients and families includes educating patients and parents about the genetics of CL/CP, as well as meeting the immediate medical needs.Attempts at identifying susceptibility loci via family and case-control studies have proved inconsistent. It is likely that initial predictions of the complex interactions involved in facial development were underestimated. The candidate gene list for CL/P is getting longer and the need for an impartial, systematic screening technique, to implicate or refute the inclusion of particular loci, is apparent. So we are faced with the question "Can this complex trait be too complex?"The aim of this review is to make the dentist aware of the differences between syndromic and non-syndromic cleft as well as understanding the etiological variation in cleft lip with and without cleft palate. This will aid the dentist in diagnosis and give proper genetic counseling to parents and patients of cleft lip and palate.

scholarly journals Successful Pharyngoplasty After Le Fort I Advancement In A Severely Neglected Cleft Lip And Palate Patient

2021 ◽  
Vol 4 (1) ◽  
pp. 24
Author(s):  
Timotius Hansen Arista ◽  
Magda Rosalina Hutagalung
Keyword(s):  
Cleft Lip ◽  
Speech Therapy ◽  
Cleft Lip And Palate ◽  
Velopharyngeal Insufficiency ◽  
Age At Surgery ◽  
Orthognatic Surgery ◽  
Speech Therapist ◽  
Pharyngeal Flap ◽  
Operative Assessment ◽  
Type 3

Background: When indicated, velopharyngeal insufficiency (VPI) is treated with pharyngoplasty with consideration of patient’s age. Several studies have evaluated the relationship between age at surgery and speech outcome. The best results regarding reduction of open nasality were obtained when surgeries were performed around age of 5 to 6 years and operative complications were also less frequent in the younger age group than in older patients. Pre-operative assessment such as nasopharyngoscopy and/or videofluoroscopy gives surgeons a chance to estimate flap dimension to correct the defect causing the VPI. Moreover, velopharyngoplasty proceeded with speech therapy yields better recovery.Case History : A seriously neglected case of cleft lip and palate was reported. A 24 years old female underwent two palatorrhaphy at age 13 and 14 years old, which were far beyond the recommended age of 10 – 12 months. The resulting hypernasality was further worsened by absence of speech therapy which should have been followed from age 1 – 4 years old. On presentation, this patient requested to have immediate orthognatic surgery to repair his severe type 3 facial profile and malocclusion, a procedure which he underwent worsening the VPI. We decided to surgically correct the VPI. Nasoendoscopic assessment revealed he had an antero-posterior velopharyngeal closure problem which indicated a pharyngoplasty using a superiorlybased pharyngeal flap. Three months post-operatively his speech was re-evaluated by a speech therapist and nasoendoscopically. Despite imperfectness, significant improvement was achieved.Conclusion : Pharyngoplasty could still be reliable to a certain extent as a correction treatment of VPI in a seriously neglected case. A posterior pharyngeal flap helped this patient to recover significant speech capacity.

Comparison of Velopharyngeal Growth Patterns between Cleft Lip and/or Palate Patients Requiring or Not Requiring Pharyngeal Flap Surgery

1994 ◽  
Vol 31 (6) ◽  
pp. 452-460 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mohammad Mazaheri ◽  
Athanasios E. Athanasiou ◽  
Ross E. Long
Keyword(s):  
Cleft Palate ◽  
Soft Palate ◽  
Cleft Lip ◽  
Cleft Lip And Palate ◽  
Growth Curves ◽  
Growth Patterns ◽  
Flap Surgery ◽  
Velopharyngeal Incompetence ◽  
Lateral Cephalograms ◽  
Pharyngeal Flap

This investigation compares the patterns of velopharyngeal growth in cleft lip and/or palate patients. Those who had velopharyngeal competence and acceptable speech are compared with those who presented with velopharyngeal incompetence requiring pharyngeal flap surgery or prosthesis later. Lateral cephalograms of 30 cleft palate only (CPO), 35 unilateral cleft lip and palate (UCLP), and 20 bilateral cleft lip and palate (BCLP) children of the Lancaster Cleft Palate Clinic were studied. These records were taken at 6 month intervals during the first 2 postnatal years and annually thereafter up to 6 years of age. Soft tissue landmark points in the velopharyngeal region were digitized. Length and thickness of the soft palate and height and depth of the nasopharynx were measured. Evaluation of the growth curves of these four cephalometric variables indicated only two significant differences between children who later required pharyngeal flap surgery and those who did not. These differences were found in the growth in length of the soft palate of the CPO group and in the growth in depth of the nasopharynx of the BCLP group. Based on the present cephalometric data, it is Impossible to predict at an early age those cleft lip and/or palate patients who will later require pharyngeal flaps.

Dynamic Analysis of Articulatory Movement Using Magnetic Resonance Imaging Movies: Methods and Implications in Cleft Lip and Palate

2005 ◽  
Vol 42 (3) ◽  
pp. 225-230 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hideo Shinagawa ◽  
Takashi Ono ◽  
Ei-Ichi Honda ◽  
Shinobu Masaki ◽  
Yasuhiro Shimada ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Magnetic Resonance Imaging ◽  
Magnetic Resonance ◽  
Cleft Lip ◽  
Cleft Lip And Palate ◽  
Posterior Pharyngeal Wall ◽  
Normal Volunteer ◽  
Resonance Imaging ◽  
Pharyngeal Wall ◽  
Articulatory Movement ◽  
The Subject

Objectives To visualize articulatory movement using a magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) movie of a subject with cleft lip and palate (CLP) and to demonstrate the usefulness of this method for studying oropharyngeal function. Material and Methods Dynamic changes in oropharyngeal structures were assessed with an MRI movie of a man with cleft lip and palate and in a normal adult male volunteer during the articulation of /pa/, /ta/, and /ka/. Results and Conclusions Different movement patterns were observed during articulation in the subject with CLP compared with the normal volunteer. Posterosuperior movement of the tongue and the anterior movement of the posterior pharyngeal wall were clearly visualized in the subject with CLP. Thus, MRI movies appear to be a promising tool for evaluating speech function in patients with CLP because of their noninvasive and nonradiation nature.

Speech Intelligibility of Patients with Cleft Lip and Palate after Placement of Speech Prosthesis

2007 ◽  
Vol 44 (6) ◽  
pp. 635-641 ◽  
Author(s):  
João Henrique Nogueira Pinto ◽  
Giseleda Silva Dalben ◽  
Maria Inês Pegoraro-Krook
Keyword(s):  
Cleft Palate ◽  
Speech Intelligibility ◽  
Cleft Lip ◽  
Speech Therapy ◽  
Cleft Lip And Palate ◽  
Velopharyngeal Insufficiency ◽  
Cross Sectional ◽  
Before And After ◽  
Dental Needs

Objective: To evaluate the speech intelligibility of patients with clefts before and after placement of a speech prosthesis. Design: Cross-sectional. Setting: Hospital for Rehabilitation of Craniofacial Anomalies, University of São Paulo (HRAC/USP), Bauru, Brazil. Patients: Twenty-seven patients with unoperated cleft palate or operated cleft palate presenting with velopharyngeal insufficiency (VPI) after primary palatoplasty, treated with speech prosthesis, aged 8 to 63 years. Interventions: Patients were fitted with palatopharyngeal obturators or pharyngeal bulbs, suitable to their dental needs. Five speech-language pathologists blindly evaluated speech samples of the patients with and without the prosthesis. Main Outcome Measures: Classification of speech samples according to a scoring system developed for speech intelligibility problems: 1 (normal), 2 (mild), 3 (mild to moderate), 4 (moderate), 5 (moderate to severe), and 6 (severe). Results were evaluated by the calculation of means of all judges for each patient in both situations. Results: The judges presented significant agreement (W = .789, p < .01). Speech intelligibility was significantly better after placement of the prosthesis for both unoperated patients (Z = 1.93, p = .02) and operated patients with VPI after primary palatoplasty (Z = 1.78, p = .03). Conclusions: Speech intelligibility may be improved by rehabilitation of patients with cleft palate using a speech prosthesis. Speech therapy is needed to eliminate any compensatory articulation productions developed prior to prosthetic management.

Visual Training and Correction of Articulation Disorders by Use of Dynamic Palatography

1986 ◽  
Vol 51 (3) ◽  
pp. 226-238 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ken-Ichi Michi ◽  
Noriko Suzuki ◽  
Yukari Yamashita ◽  
Satoko Imai
Keyword(s):  
Cleft Palate ◽  
Hard Palate ◽  
Cleft Lip ◽  
Speech Therapy ◽  
Cleft Lip And Palate ◽  
Treatment Plan ◽  
Visual Display ◽  
Palatal Plate ◽  
Articulation Disorders ◽  
Visual Indication

The dynamic palatograph is an electrical apparatus that generates a visual display of constantly changing palatolingual contact as a function of time, using an artificial palatal plate with affixed electrodes. This paper describes a technique of speech therapy incorporating dynamic palatography for a cleft palate patient. The patient, a 6-year-old Japanese girl with a repaired unilateral cleft lip and palate, had been judged to demonstrate articulation disorders involving contact of the tongue with the hard palate or alveolus following surgical improvement of velopharyngeal function. Prior to therapy the tongue tended to contact the hard palate more posteriorly than normal. After therapy with the dynamic palatograph, palatolingual contact was normal in comparison with average speakers. Our findings suggest that the facility of constant visual indication of tongue posture to the clinician and patient during corrective speech therapy using dynamic palatography may expedite results with cleft palate patients in the speech clinic when implemented in a carefully structured treatment plan.

scholarly journals Scandcleft Project Trial 2—Comparison of Speech Outcome in 1- and 2-Stage Palatal Closure in 5-Year-Olds With UCLP

2019 ◽  
Vol 57 (4) ◽  
pp. 458-469
Author(s):  
Inger Lundeborg Hammarström ◽  
Jill Nyberg ◽  
Suvi Alaluusua ◽  
Jorma Rautio ◽  
Erik Neovius ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cleft Palate ◽  
Hard Palate ◽  
Cleft Lip ◽  
Speech Therapy ◽  
Cleft Lip And Palate ◽  
Burden Of Treatment ◽  
Hearing Thresholds ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Age Appropriate ◽  
Velopharyngeal Function

Objective: To investigate in-depth speech results in the Scandcleft Trial 2 with comparisons between surgical protocols and centers and with benchmarks from peers without cleft palate. Design: A prospective randomized clinical trial. Setting: Two Swedish and one Finnish Cleft Palate center. Participants: One hundred twelve participants were 5-years-old born with unilateral cleft lip and palate randomized to either lip repair and soft palate closure at 4 months and hard palate closure at 12 months or lip repair at 3 to 4 months (Arm A), or a closure of both the soft and hard palate at 12 months (Arm C). Main Outcome Measures: A composite measure dichotomized into velopharyngeal competency (VPC) or velopharyngeal incompetency (VPI), overall assessment of velopharyngeal function (VPC-Rate), percentage of consonants correct (PCC score), and consonant errors. In addition, number of speech therapy visits, average hearing thresholds, and secondary surgeries were documented to assess burden of treatment. Results: Across the trial, 53.5% demonstrated VPC and 46.5% VPI with no significant differences between arms or centers. In total, 27% reached age-appropriate PCC scores with no statistically significant difference between the arms. The Finnish center had significantly higher PCC scores, the Swedish centers had higher percentages of oral consonant errors. Number of speech therapy visits was significantly higher in the Finnish center. Conclusion: At age 5, poor speech outcomes with some differences between participating centers were seen but could not be attributed to surgical protocol. As one center had very few participants, the results from that center should be interpreted with caution.

Speech in Unilateral and Bilateral Cleft Palate Patients from Stockholm

1993 ◽  
Vol 30 (1) ◽  
pp. 73-77 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jonas Karling ◽  
Ola Larson ◽  
Rolf Leanderson ◽  
Gunilla Henningsson
Keyword(s):  
Surgical Treatment ◽  
Cleft Lip ◽  
Speech Therapy ◽  
Cleft Lip And Palate ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Primary Surgery ◽  
Bilateral Cleft Lip ◽  
Pharyngeal Flap ◽  
Palatal Surgery ◽  
Parental Information

The speech of 84 patients with complete unilateral cleft lip and palate and 19 patients with complete bilateral cleft lip and palate was judged by professional listeners and compared with a control group of 40 noncleft subjects. The unilateral cleft group consisted of two subgroups: one group of 45 patients, who were treated with presurgicat orthopedics before primary surgery, and one group of 39 patients, who were not. The speech of the patients and the noncleft subjects was tape recorded and randomly mixed prior to listener judgments. No significant differences in articulation or resonance were found between the subgroups of unilateral cleft patients. The results also indicated that the bilateral cleft patients had poorer speech and needed more speech therapy than the unilateral cleft patients. All cleft patients were found to have poorer speech than the noncleft subjects in spite of considerable speech therapy and complementary surgical treatment. This has resulted in a change in the Stockholm approach toward earlier palatal surgery, tailormade pharyngeal flap operations, and earlier parental information and treatment of articulatory deviations.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document