National Kidney Allocation System

2017 ◽  
Author(s):  
William S Asch ◽  
Darren Stewart ◽  
Richard N Formica

Deceased donor kidneys for transplantation represent a scarce national resource. Therefore, allocation practices must be built on fair and equitable policies that ensure the best possible use of each kidney. The current kidney allocation policy was a decade in the making and required multiple rounds of public comment and revision to create a policy that balances utility and equity. The new allocation policy improves utility by maximizing life-years gained from kidney transplantation through longevity matching: pairing those patients with the longest expected life with kidneys expected to last the longest. It also, for the first time in kidney allocation, allocates kidneys based on need by prioritizing the highly sensitized patient and giving waiting time credit for time spent on dialysis prior to registration. Finally, the system attempts to both increase recovery and promote rapid placement of kidney from older donors. This is done through an opt-in system that attempts to allocate kidneys with a shorter duration of expected function and a higher Kidney Donor Profile Index to older recipients who would trade off a greater duration of function for more rapid transplantation. Coupled with the new allocation policy, the use of biopsy results from deceased donor grafts, characteristics of blood flow when placed on mechanical perfusion devices, and molecular biomarker measurement have the potential to expand the available pool of deceased donor kidneys. The new approach to kidney allocation in the United States provides a case study into how to thoughtfully and equitably distribute a scarce resource.

2015 ◽  
Vol 15 (9) ◽  
pp. 2465-2469 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. R. Tambur ◽  
K. M. K. Haarberg ◽  
J. J. Friedewald ◽  
J. R. Leventhal ◽  
M. F. Cusick ◽  
...  

2014 ◽  
Vol 25 (8) ◽  
pp. 1842-1848 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ajay K. Israni ◽  
Nicholas Salkowski ◽  
Sally Gustafson ◽  
Jon J. Snyder ◽  
John J. Friedewald ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sameera Senanayake ◽  
Nicholas Graves ◽  
Helen Healy ◽  
Keshwar Baboolal ◽  
Adrian Barnett ◽  
...  

Abstract Background: Matching survival of a donor kidney with that of the recipient (longevity matching), is use in some kidney allocation systems to maximize graft-life years. It is not part of the allocation algorithm for Australia. Given the growing evidence of survival benefit due to longevity matching based allocation algorithms, development of a similar kidney allocation system for Australia is currently underway. The aim of this research is to estimate the impact that changes to costs and health outcomes arising from ‘longevity matching’ on the Australian healthcare system. Methods: A decision analytic model to estimate cost-effectiveness was developed using a Markov process. Four plausible competing allocation options were compared to the current kidney allocation practice. Models were simulated in one-year cycles for a 20-year time horizon, with transitions through distinct health states relevant to the kidney recipient. Willingness to pay was considered as AUD 28000. Results: Base case analysis indicated that allocating the worst 20% of Kidney Donor Risk Index (KDRI) donor kidneys to the worst 20% of estimated post-transplant survival (EPTS) recipients (option 2) and allocating the oldest 25% of donor kidneys to the oldest 25% of recipients are both cost saving and more effective compared to the current Australian allocation practice. Option 2, returned the lowest costs, greatest health benefits and largest gain to net monetary benefits (NMB). Allocating the best 20% of KDRI donor kidneys to the best 20% of EPTS recipients had the lowest expected incremental NMB. Conclusion: Of the four longevity-based kidney allocation practices considered, transplanting the lowest quality kidneys to the worst kidney recipients (option 2), was estimated to return the best value for money for the Australian health system.


2019 ◽  
Vol 19 (11) ◽  
pp. 3079-3086 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kyle R. Jackson ◽  
Sheng Zhou ◽  
Jessica Ruck ◽  
Allan B. Massie ◽  
Courtenay Holscher ◽  
...  

2016 ◽  
Vol 77 ◽  
pp. 68
Author(s):  
Michelle J. Hickey ◽  
Ying Zheng ◽  
Carolyn Krystal ◽  
Nicole Valenzuela ◽  
Eileen Tsai ◽  
...  

2005 ◽  
Vol 46 (1) ◽  
pp. 134-135
Author(s):  
Rena Fraden

The Federal Theatre Project . . . was a unique and influential experiment in American theatre; not just for its outspoken politics, but because it reimagined the very way that theatre was produced in the United States. For the first time in the history of the country theatre was subsidized by the federal government, a practice with widespread precedents in Europe and Asia, but one that was totally out of step with free enterprise business practice and a culture which had banned plays in its Second Continental Congress. (1)So opens Barry Witham's case study of the Seattle Federal Theatre Project from 1935 to 1939.


Author(s):  
Gilles Barthe ◽  
Marc Gourjon ◽  
Benjamin Grégoire ◽  
Maximilian Orlt ◽  
Clara Paglialonga ◽  
...  

We propose a new approach for building efficient, provably secure, and practically hardened implementations of masked algorithms. Our approach is based on a Domain Specific Language in which users can write efficient assembly implementations and fine-grained leakage models. The latter are then used as a basis for formal verification, allowing for the first time formal guarantees for a broad range of device-specific leakage effects not addressed by prior work. The practical benefits of our approach are demonstrated through a case study of the PRESENT S-Box: we develop a highly optimized and provably secure masked implementation, and show through practical evaluation based on TVLA that our implementation is practically resilient. Our approach significantly narrows the gap between formal verification of masking and practical security.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document