Coding and Billing

2017 ◽  
Author(s):  
Samuel A Tisherman ◽  
Daniel Herr

Appropriate documentation and coding are critical for billing in the intensive care unit (ICU). Diagnoses are based on the International Statistical Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems (e.g., ICD-9 or ICD-10). Procedures are coded based on the Current Procedural Terminology (CPT) system. Evaluation and management (E/M) services make up the vast majority of non–procedure-based care provided by physicians in the ICU environment. Critical care services (codes 99291 and 99292) represent a specific subset of the CPT codes for E/M with different requirements. Three criteria must be met to justify a critical care code. First, the physician must document that the patient is critically ill (i.e., the patient has impairment in one or more vital organ systems with a high probability of imminent or life-threatening deterioration). Second, critical care requires high-complexity medical decision making to support vital organ function and/or prevent further deterioration. Third, critical care codes are time based. The physician must document the time spent in “full attention” to the patient. Critical care can also be provided via telemedicine technologies. Reimbursement for these services requires appropriate credentialing and contracts with the hospital, as well as appropriate documentation. Hospital reimbursement is based on Medical Severity-Diagnosis Related Groups (MS-DRGs), as documented in the medical record. Based on performance, a portion of hospital reimbursement may be withheld if the rates for certain hospital-acquired conditions are too high. Accurate documentation serves to (1) provide good communication between providers, (2) justify billing, and (3) legally document what was done for the patient and why. This review contains 4 tables, and 13 references. Key words: critical care codes, evaluation and management codes, global surgical package, pay for performance

1994 ◽  
Vol 9 (2) ◽  
pp. 58-63 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gilbert M. Goldman ◽  
Thyyar M. Ravindranath

Critical care decision-making involves principles common to all medical decision-making. However, critical care is a remarkably distinctive form of clinical practice and therefore it may be useful to distinguish those elements particularly important or unique to ICU decision-making. The peculiar contextuality of critical care decision-making may be the best example of these elements. If so, attempts to improve our understanding of ICU decision-making may benefit from a formal analysis of its remarkable contextual nature. Four key elements of the context of critical care decisions can be identified: (1) costs, (2) time constraints, (3) the uncertain status of much clinical data, and (4) the continually changing environment of the ICU setting. These 4 elements comprise the context for the practice of clinical judgment in the ICU. The fact that intensivists are severely constrained by teh context of each case has important ramifications both for practice and for retrospective review. During retrospective review, the contextual nature of ICU judgment may be unfairly neglected by ignoring one or more of the key elements. Such neglect can be avoided if intensivists demand empathetic evaluation from reviewers.


2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Aleah L. Brubaker ◽  
Marianne Chen ◽  
Amy Gallo

Management of the postoperative liver transplant patient can be extremely challenging. The combination of preoperative comorbidities and intraoperative complexity can make for a tenuous postoperative critical care course. Consideration and monitoring of graft function are paramount as poor graft function or primary graft nonfunction will affect every aspect of care. Our goal in this review is to use a systems-based approach to highlight the key tenets for postoperative management of liver transplant patients to help orchestrate integrated care across subspecialties.  This review contains 2 figures, 2 tables, and 94 references. Key words: critical care, liver transplant, systems-based management


2015 ◽  
Vol 2015 ◽  
pp. 1-8 ◽  
Author(s):  
Vi Am Dinh ◽  
Paresh C. Giri ◽  
Inimai Rathinavel ◽  
Emilie Nguyen ◽  
David Hecht ◽  
...  

Objectives. Despite the increasing utilization of point-of-care critical care ultrasonography (CCUS), standards establishing competency for its use are lacking. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of a 2-day CCUS course implementation on ultrasound-naïve critical care medicine (CCM) fellows.Methods. Prospective evaluation of the impact of a two-day CCUS course on eight CCM fellows’ attitudes, proficiency, and use of CCUS. Ultrasound competency on multiple organ systems was assessed including abdominal, pulmonary, vascular, and cardiac systems. Subjects served as self-controls and were assessed just prior to, within 1 week after, and 3 months after the course.Results. There was a significant improvement in CCM fellows’ written test scores, image acquisition ability, and pathologic image interpretation 1 week after the course and it was retained 3 months after the course. Fellows also had self-reported increased confidence and usage of CCUS applications after the course.Conclusions. Implementation of a 2-day critical care ultrasound course covering general CCUS and basic critical care echocardiography using a combination of didactics, live models, and ultrasound simulators is effective in improving critical care fellows’ proficiency and confidence with ultrasound use in both the short- and long-term settings.


2011 ◽  
Vol 397 (2) ◽  
pp. 317-326 ◽  
Author(s):  
Wilm Quentin ◽  
◽  
David Scheller-Kreinsen ◽  
Alexander Geissler ◽  
Reinhard Busse

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document