Institutional Ownership and CEO Equity Incentives

2016 ◽  
Vol 29 (3) ◽  
pp. 55-77 ◽  
Author(s):  
Brian Bratten ◽  
Yanfeng Xue

ABSTRACT This study provides new evidence on the relation between institutional ownership and the equity incentives provided to CEOs by their portfolio holdings of stock and stock options. We show that when firms' CEOs have abnormally high equity incentives, higher institutional ownership is associated with a larger reduction in the incentives. Conversely, when firms' CEOs have abnormally low equity incentives, higher institutional ownership is associated with a larger increase in these incentives. To achieve this, we find that firms with higher institutional ownership that have abnormally high (low) incentives experience a greater reduction (increase) in CEO annual option grants and a substitution between CEO equity-based compensation and cash-based compensation. Our findings highlight the important role of institutional investors in enhancing efficiency in the top executives' compensation contracting process. JEL Classifications: G30; G34; J33; L25; M41.

Author(s):  
Aslı Aybars ◽  
Levent Ataünal

Earnings management is an important factor that considerably affects the reporting quality of firms and conceivably results in suboptimal investor decisions. The presence of active institutional investors among the equity holders is generally accepted as an external control mechanism that moderates earnings management problems. This chapter aimed to evaluate the role of institutional investors on earnings management with a data of firms listed on Borsa Istanbul between 2005 and 2011. The study found a significant and negative relation between institutional ownership level and managerial discretion exercised in opportunistic management of accruals and confirmed the substantial role played by institutional investors in monitoring and disciplining corporate managers. In other words, the managers' tendency for earnings management practices is observed to be mitigated by institutional shareholdings.


2020 ◽  
Vol 12 (3) ◽  
pp. 1021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hideaki Sakawa ◽  
Naoki Watanabel

This study aimed to reveal the role of institutional investors with shareholder-oriented scopes in a stakeholder-oriented economy such as Japan. With financial globalization, the increasing number of institutional shareholders in Japanese corporations enables us to investigate whether their shareholder-oriented perspectives are conducive to taking on effective monitoring roles under stakeholder-oriented corporate governance. This study’s sample included large listed firms of the TOPIX 500 in Japan during 2010-2016. Using 2924 firm-year observations, the effect of institutional investors on firm performance was analyzed to test the role of institutional investors in stakeholder-oriented corporate governance. Our study showed that the monitoring role of institutional shareholders, or foreign shareholders, functions effectively in Japanese corporations. In addition, we showed that the monitoring roles of these are expected to strengthen firms through higher growth opportunities. These results implied that institutional shareholders contribute to enhancing sustainable firm performance and constructing sustainable corporate governance mechanisms in a stakeholder-oriented system.


2018 ◽  
Vol 17 (1) ◽  
pp. 87-102 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tee Chwee Ming ◽  
Yee-Boon Foo ◽  
Ferdinand A. Gul ◽  
Abdul Majid

ABSTRACT This study uses Malaysian data to examine whether institutional investors affect the association between firm performance and CEO compensation. Overall, we find that total institutional investor ownership has a negative effect on the positive association between firm performance and CEO compensation, which suggests ineffective monitoring. When the institutional investors are categorized into local and foreign, we find that the negative effect is driven by local institutional ownership, consistent with the argument that foreign institutional investors are associated with better monitoring. Our results provide new insights on the association between institutional investors and the CEO compensation-firm performance relationship in an emerging economy. JEL Classifications: G34; J33.


2017 ◽  
Vol 43 (11) ◽  
pp. 1236-1253 ◽  
Author(s):  
Chwee Ming Tee

Purpose The purpose of this paper is to examine the association between politically connected (POLCON) firms and stock price synchronicity, and whether this association can be attenuated by institutional investors. Design/methodology/approach This paper uses an ordinary least square regression model to examine the association between POLCON firms and stock price synchronicity; institutional ownership and stock price synchronicity; the moderating role of institutional ownership on the association between POLCON firms and stock price synchronicity; institutional domiciles and stock price synchronicity; and the moderating role of institutional domiciles on the association between POLCON firms and stock price synchronicity. Findings The result shows that POLCON firms are positively associated with stock price synchronicity. Further, the author also finds that institutional monitoring, through higher ownership by local institutional investors is associated with lower stock price synchronicity. In addition, this study documents evidence that institutional investors, particularly local institutional investors can improve stock price informativeness in POLCON firms. Research limitations/implications The results suggest that POLCON firms are plagued by severe agency problems, resulting in limited flow of firm-specific information to the capital markets. However, the author shows that POLCON firm’s agency problems can be attenuated through effective monitoring by institutional investors. Further, institutional domiciles are shown to be significantly associated with stock price synchronocity. However, effective monitoring is largely driven by local institutional investors, in line with the geographical proximity theory. Practical implications The results suggest that regulators should increase their surveillance and monitoring effort, particularly on firms with close ties to the government. In particular, POLCON firms should be required to be more transparent in their corporate dealings. Additionally, auditors should intensify their audit efforts on POLCON firm to provide more reliable financial information to minority shareholders, investors and analysts. Finally, institutional investors should be incentivized by the Malaysian Securities Commission, via, the code of governance to play an effective monitoring role in Malaysian firms. Originality/value This study reveals that POLCON firms’ severe agency problems can be alleviated by effective institutional monitoring. Further result identifies institutional domiciles as a significant factor in influencing monitoring effectiveness in POLCON firms. This paper provides insights into the dynamic interaction between political connections, institutional monitoring, firm governance and capital markets behavior of an emerging market.


2017 ◽  
Vol 35 (1) ◽  
pp. 53-78 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ching-Lung Chen ◽  
Pei-Yu Weng ◽  
Yu-Chih Lin

This study uses unbalanced panel data to construct the empirical regressions, and examines the role of the global financial crisis and institutional ownership on the earnings informativeness of firm with income smoothing. The result reveals that the earnings informativeness of income smoothing decreased after the occurrence of the crisis. High institutional ownership also reduces the informativeness of earnings for firms with income smoothing and supports the institutional investors’ opportunism hypothesis. Yet, this result is prominent when the institutional ownership is held by the qualified foreign rather than local institutional investors. This study implements several diagnostic checks and demonstrates that the results are robust to various specifications.


2016 ◽  
Vol 28 (2) ◽  
pp. 153-179 ◽  
Author(s):  
Samuel Jebaraj Benjamin ◽  
Mazlina Mat Zain ◽  
Effiezal Aswadi Abdul Wahab

Purpose The purpose of this study is to examine the agency problem of expropriation using dividends in politically connected firms and the relevance of institutional investors in limiting this problem. The growing presence of this group of shareholders offers a unique opportunity to test their importance in the context of dividends payments and expropriation. Design/methodology/approach This study uses the Tobit regression to test the association between political connection, institutional investors and dividend payouts. The results are also robust to the three-stage-least squares regressions method. Findings The study is based on a random sample of 2,458 Malaysian firms-year observations for the period of 2004-2009. The results reveal that politically connected firms have an inclination to pay lower dividends, while institutional ownership is associated with higher dividend payouts. Furthermore, the findings reveal that higher levels of institutional ownership moderates the negative relationship between politically connected firms and dividends. Research implications The findings have an important implication to regulators as it suggests that the institutional investors can influence the dividend payouts in politically connected firms through active monitoring, thus alleviating agency problems. This also provides a positive feedback on the regulators’ governance initiatives that quest to strengthen the roles of institutional investors. Originality/value This study is the first to examine the effectiveness of the monitoring role of institutional investors in the context of expropriation by politically connected firms from the perspective of dividend payouts.


2019 ◽  
Vol 11 (19) ◽  
pp. 5485
Author(s):  
Mo ◽  
Park ◽  
Kim

Chief executive officer (CEO) retirement pension plans are known as sustainable compensation because they induce managers to make more sustainable and long-term-oriented corporate decisions. We focused on the role of institutional investors in awarding CEO pension plans. Long-term and short-term institutional investors are expected to increase and decrease the CEO pension plan, respectively, wherein the former is aimed at persuading the manager to focus more on the firm’s long-term performance and the latter is aimed at making the CEO assume more risk. We empirically tested our hypothesis and found significantly negative (positive) relationship between short-term (long-term) institutional ownership and CEO pension plans, which is consistent with our hypothesis. Our results suggest the institutional ownership horizon’s differing impact on managers’ sustainable compensation structure.


2018 ◽  
Vol 34 (2) ◽  
pp. 309-324
Author(s):  
Daecheon Yang ◽  
Kyoungwon Mo

This study examines the monitoring role of institutional investors in both mitigating the degree of downward-sticky CEO compensation and alleviating the undesirable effects of the sticky compensation on shareholder wealth. Particularly, we parallel the literature on “pay for performance” and institutional monitoring role to critically examine the measure of fluctuating pay-for-performance sensitivity, re-characterize the asymmetric compensation-performance link, and then capture managerial rent extraction. We find that sticky CEO compensation is significantly and negatively associated with firm value. Further, we find that institutional ownership decreases the compensation stickiness in underperforming firms and ameliorates its value-deteriorating effect.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document