The Art of Advocacy-A Plea for the Renaissance of the Trial Lawyer

1955 ◽  
Vol 64 (3) ◽  
pp. 474
Author(s):  
James D. St. Clair ◽  
Lloyd Paul Stryker
Keyword(s):  
Trial Lawyer

Patient Statement: A Canary's Tale

1994 ◽  
Vol 10 (4-5) ◽  
pp. 323-326
Author(s):  
Jacob Berkson
Keyword(s):  
Environmental Pollution ◽  
Multiple Chemical Sensitivity ◽  
Organophosphate Pesticide ◽  
Chemical Sensitivity ◽  
Environmental Illness ◽  
Trial Lawyer ◽  
Multiple Chemical

I am Jacob B. Berkson, a 68-year-old resident of Hagerstown, Maryland. I was a trial lawyer for some 40 years. I am now retired and writing a book on Environmental Pollution and Environmental Illness, titled A Canary's Tale. I was invited to speak to you as a patient one who was poisoned by an organophosphate pesticide and who subsequently developed Multiple Chemical Sensitivity (MCS, or sometimes referred to as Environmental Illness, EI).

Max D. Steuer: Trial Lawyer

1951 ◽  
Vol 42 (2) ◽  
pp. 230
Author(s):  
Harold M. Helfman ◽  
Aron Steuer
Keyword(s):  
Trial Lawyer

Training the Trial Lawyer: A Neglected Area of Legal Education

1950 ◽  
Vol 3 (1) ◽  
pp. 48
Author(s):  
Robert H. Jackson
Keyword(s):  
Legal Education ◽  
Trial Lawyer

A Comparison of Trial Lawyer and News Reporter Attitudes about Courthouse Communication

1991 ◽  
Vol 68 (4) ◽  
pp. 750-763
Author(s):  
Jeremy Harris Lipschultz
Keyword(s):  
Q Method ◽  
Trial Lawyer ◽  
The Relationship

Courthouse reporters and trial lawyers share views of the importance of cooperation to promote solid coverage of the courts. Q-method reveals that news reporters who cover courts do not hold attitude patterns different from their lawyer sources about their relationships in the news-gathering process. Reporters can predict the perceptions of lawyers, and vice versa. The relationship is symbiotic.

scholarly journals Law against the people/The empire strikes back

2018 ◽  
Vol 1 (42) ◽  
Author(s):  
George E. Bisharat
Keyword(s):  
Middle East ◽  
San Francisco ◽  
Political Strategy ◽  
The Public ◽  
The People ◽  
Boomerang Effect ◽  
Legal Forms ◽  
Trial Lawyer ◽  
Middle East Studies

George E. Bisharat Emeritus Professor of Law, University of California Hastings College of the Law. George E. Bisharat was a trial lawyer for the Office of the Public Defender in San Francisco before joining the UC Hastings faculty in 1991. Professor Bisharat studied law, anthropology, and Middle East studies at Harvard, and wrote a book about Palestinian lawyers working under Israeli military occupation in the West Bank. He writes frequently on the Middle East, both for academic audiences and for major media sources in the U.S. and abroad. After taking emeritus status in 2015, Bisharat, as �Big Harp George,� has recorded two blues albums that earned award nominations and critical acclaim. SUMMARY The objective of this article is to describe and analyze how supporters of Israeli state policies have, since 2000, used legal forms often associated with efforts by the powerless to challenge entrenched power to instead turn those forms into tools of the powerful. This movement to use �law against the people� has come about largely as a reaction against attempts by activists to use courts and other legal fora to advance Palestinian rights. This unexpected boomerang effect provides reason for reflection on the role of law in the struggle for justice in Israel/Palestine, suggesting that law offers little promise of relief, at least when it is not integrated with and supported by a broader political strategy.

Max D. Steuer, Trial Lawyer

1950 ◽  
Vol 64 (1) ◽  
pp. 183 ◽  
Author(s):  
Aron Steuer
Keyword(s):  
Trial Lawyer

scholarly journals LEGAL PERSPECTIVE: Q&A WITH DANIEL F. GOLDSTEIN

2013 ◽  
Vol 17 (3) ◽  
Author(s):  
Kristen Betts
Keyword(s):  
Higher Education ◽  
Educational Technology ◽  
Students With Disabilities ◽  
Support Services ◽  
Educational Programs ◽  
Digital Content ◽  
Administrative Staff ◽  
Online Programs ◽  
Legal Perspective ◽  
Trial Lawyer

For students with disabilities to have the same opportunities to succeed as their nondisabled peers, access to educational technology and digital content is critical. It is essential that higher education boards, administrators, faculty, and administrative staff understand why accessibility must be on the forefront of our educational programs, co-curricular initiatives, support services, and infrastructure for on-campus and online programs. This question and answer session with Daniel F. Goldstein, a partner and trial lawyer with Brown, Goldstein & Levy, provides a legal perspective on issues relating to accessibility and online learning.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document