The History of Photography as Art History

Art Journal ◽  
1971 ◽  
Vol 31 (1) ◽  
pp. 31 ◽  
Author(s):  
Milton W. Brown
Art Journal ◽  
1971 ◽  
Vol 31 (1) ◽  
pp. 31-36 ◽  
Author(s):  
Milton W. Brown

Art Journal ◽  
1976 ◽  
Vol 36 (1) ◽  
pp. 94
Author(s):  
William Hauptman ◽  
Volker Kahmen

Art Journal ◽  
1976 ◽  
Vol 36 (1) ◽  
pp. 94-98
Author(s):  
William Hauptman

2020 ◽  
Vol 45 (1) ◽  
pp. 24-34
Author(s):  
Sonja Fessel

The photography collection of the German documentation centre for art history, Deutsches Dokumentationszentrum für Kunstgeschichte – Bildarchiv Foto Marburg (DDK), comprises more than 2.8 million objects. These include roughly 500,000 glass negatives, of which nearly 3,000 were made by the first Hessian state conservator Ludwig Bickell between 1870 and 1901. These early glass plates show a large number of retouchings and traces of their production and usage. This makes them rich sources for photographic and art historical or cultural historical research as well as conservation studies.


2014 ◽  
Vol 11 (2) ◽  
pp. 171
Author(s):  
Farid Abdullah

<strong>Abstract</strong><br />This is article about a book of Art history. The book aims have been exploratory rather than critical. The authors, Hugh Honour and John Fleming (1984),  referred exposition to interpretation and evaluation, so far as they are separable. The appeal of some works of art in this book is never purely visual, it is<br />just simply to delight our eyes. It is heavy burden to bear in mind that these conceptions are peculiar to the West perspective. It try to vast a large horizon in both time and space, attention on historically prominent periods and areas,<br />which are also those of most basic interest. Chapters are arranged chronogically, across a wide geographical panorama in order to allow crucial events in world history of humankind. This article also focus to history of photography, that was closely allied with both painting and print making, since of its invention in the 1830s. At last, history of art inevitably reflect the feelings and minds of their authors, who have been almost as diverse as the artists about whom they write, as diverse and many-sided as the works of art themselves.<br /><br /><br /><strong>Abstrak</strong><br />Tulisan ini adalah bedah buku tentang sejarah seni. Tujuan buku adalah melakukan penjelajahan daripada bacaan kritis. Penyusunnya, Hugh Honour dan John Fleming, memilih penjelasan terperinci dan sarat penilaian, yang sesungguhnya keduanya dapat terpisah. Karya-karya seni yang ditampilkan pada buku penuh visual, bermaksud untuk menyenangkan amatan pembaca. Beban besar dipikul buku ini, terkait<br />sudut pandang Barat yang rumit. Cakrawala luas ruang dan waktu dibentangkan luas pada buku ini. Penyusunan bab dibuat secara kronologis, merentang panorama geografis teramat lebar dalam rangka menjelaskan peristiwa-peristiwa penting sejarah umat manusia. Tulisan ini juga memusatkan diri pada sejarah fotografi, yang memiliki hubungan erat dengan seni lukis dan cetak mencetak, sejak temuan pada tahun 1830. Pada akhirnya, sejarah adalah cermin dari perasaan dan pikiran penulisnya, yang selalu berbeda-beda seperti halnya seniman yang mereka tulis. Berbeda-beda dan memiliki berbagai sudut pandang seperti halnya karya seni.<br /><br /><br />*) Staf Pengajar Fakultas Pendidikan Seni dan Desain, Universitas Pendidikan


2006 ◽  
Vol 31 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Maria Eliza Linhares Borges

O presente artigo toma a fotografia como ponto de partida para refletir sobre os possíveis diálogos entre dois campos de conhecimento específicos: a História Social da Cultura e a História da Arte. Além de analisar algumas das principais questões que hoje permeiam o debate relativo ao uso das representações imagéticas, sobretudo da fotografia, na História da Arte, na História da Fotografia e na Historia Social da Cultura, o artigo também identifica e discute os desafios enfrentados pelo profissional da História strictu senso na análise da composição fotográfica, cada vez mais utilizada nas pesquisas históricas. Abstract The present article presents the photography as a starting point to reflect upon the possible dialogs between two specific fields of knowledge: the Social History of Culture and Art History. Besides analyzing some of the key issues that permeate the debate regarding the use of imagetic representations, mainly photography, in the Art History, in the History of Photography and in the Social History of Culture, the article also identifies and discusses the challenges faced by the professional in strictu senso History when analyzing the photographic composition, which is used more and more in the historical research. Palavras-chave: Fotografia. História da cultura. História da arte. Key words: Photography. History of culture. History of arts.


Author(s):  
Katarzyna Czeczot

The article deals with the love of Zygmunt Krasiński to Delfina Potocka. The point of departure is the poet's definition of love as looking and reads Krasiński's relationship with his beloved in the context of two phenomena that fascinated him at the time: daguerreotype and magnetism. The invention of the daguerreotype in which the history of photography and spiritism comes together becomes a pretext for the formulation of a new concept of love and the loving subject. In the era of painting the woman was treated as a passive object of the male gaze; photography reverses this scheme of power. Love ceases to be a static relationship of the subject in love and the passive object – the beloved. The philosophy of developing photographs (and invoking phantoms) allows Krasiński - the writing subject to become like a light-sensitive material that reveals the image of the beloved.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document