Steering (Dis)Course between Metaphors and Rigor: Using Focal Analysis to Investigate an Emergence of Mathematical Objects

2000 ◽  
Vol 31 (3) ◽  
pp. 296 ◽  
Author(s):  
Anna Sfard
Keyword(s):  
Mathematical Objects ◽  
Focal Analysis

A Reductio Ad Surdum? Field on the Contingency of Mathematical Objects

Mind ◽  
1994 ◽  
Vol 103 (410) ◽  
pp. 169-184 ◽  
Author(s):  
BOB HALE ◽  
CRISPIN WRIGHT
Keyword(s):  
Mathematical Objects

Why is the learning of elementary arithmetic concepts difficult? Semiotic tools for understanding the nature of mathematical objects

2010 ◽  
Vol 77 (2-3) ◽  
pp. 247-265 ◽  
Author(s):  
Juan D. Godino ◽  
Vicenç Font ◽  
Miguel R. Wilhelmi ◽  
Orlando Lurduy
Keyword(s):  
Mathematical Objects

A Belief Expressionist Explanation of Divine Conceptualist Mathematics

Metaphysica ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 0 (0) ◽  
Author(s):  
David M. Freeman
Keyword(s):  
Peano Arithmetic ◽  
Ontological Status ◽  
Mathematical Objects ◽  
Divine Mind ◽  
Epistemological Uncertainty

Abstract Many have pointed out that the utility of mathematical objects is somewhat disconnected from their ontological status. For example, one might argue that arithmetic is useful whether or not numbers exist. We explore this phenomenon in the context of Divine Conceptualism (DC), which claims that mathematical objects exist as thoughts in the divine mind. While not arguing against DC claims, we argue that DC claims can lead to epistemological uncertainty regarding the ontological status of mathematical objects. This weakens DC attempts to explain the utility of mathematical objects on the basis of their existence. To address this weakness, we propose an appeal to Liggins’ theory of Belief Expressionism (BE). Indeed, we point out that BE is amenable to the ontological claims of DC while also explaining the utility of mathematical objects apart from reliance upon their existence. We illustrate these themes via a case study of Peano Arithmetic.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document