Prospective Elementary Teachers' Intensity and Ambivalence of Beliefs about Mathematics and Mathematics Instruction

1972 ◽  
Vol 3 (3) ◽  
pp. 155 ◽  
Author(s):  
C. Patrick Collier
1972 ◽  
Vol 3 (3) ◽  
pp. 155-163 ◽  
Author(s):  
C. Patrick Collier

A formal and an informal dimension of belief about mathematics and mathematics instruction were defined. Scales designed to measure these beliefs were administered to 264 prospective elementary teachers. Ambivalence was defined and ambivalence quotients reported. Students in later stages of their preparation had more informal views of mathematics and mathematics instruction, and their beliefs were less ambivalent than students beginning their programs. High achievers viewed mathematics as being less formal than did low achievers. Low achievers had a more ambivalent view of mathematics instruction than did high achievers. The results suggest that it is important to consider both intensity and ambivalence in investigating attitudes.


1999 ◽  
Vol 10 (3) ◽  
pp. 217-233 ◽  
Author(s):  
Teresa M. McDevitt ◽  
April L. Gardner ◽  
Janie M. Shaklee ◽  
Michele M. Bertholf ◽  
Rod Troyer

1979 ◽  
Vol 10 (5) ◽  
pp. 347-355 ◽  
Author(s):  
Verna M. Adams ◽  
Douglas B. McLeod

The relationship between the cognitive style variable of field dependence/independence and instructional treatments was investigated using high or low guidance in a unit on networks. The 97 prospective elementary teachers were tested on cognitive style (using the Group Embedded Figures Test) and on mathematical achievement (a measure of crystallized ability), and randomly assigned to treatments. Following instruction, students were tested for immediate achievement and then retested 5 weeks later. There were no interactions with field dependence/independence, but there was a significant (p < .05) interaction with crystallized ability on the retention test.


2017 ◽  
Vol 2 (2) ◽  
pp. 38-45
Author(s):  
Katherine Baker

The Mathematics Enthusiast Special Issue (2014) presented an extensive review of the literature around the content knowledge of prospective elementary teachers (PTs). The issue excluded articles around PTs’ beliefs. Understanding research around PTs’ beliefs is important to understanding how to design and support their teaching preparation. Attending to PTs’ beliefs helps to ensure their content knowledge and instructional methods are aligned with reform-based mathematics. This article highlights a literature review that addressed the omission of beliefs and explored how teacher preparation might address PTs’ held beliefs.


1995 ◽  
Vol 32 (7) ◽  
pp. 749-775 ◽  
Author(s):  
Teresa M. McDevitt ◽  
Rod Troyer ◽  
Anthony L. Ambrosio ◽  
Henry W. Heikkinen ◽  
Erica Warren

2015 ◽  
Vol 8 (1) ◽  
pp. 19
Author(s):  
Isna Rafianti ◽  
Etika Khaerunnisa

This research is motivated by the lack of interest of teachers in the use of props in the process of learning mathematics in elementary school. In accordance with the demands of the curriculum in 2013 and supported by the developed learning theory, learning mathematics is abstract object of study, students need an intermediary that props math-ematics, so that students can more easily understand the concepts that will be pre-sented, and in the end it can deliver students to solve mathematical problems, not only that proposed by the teacher but also the problems in life. The purpose of this study was to determine the interest of prospective elementary teachers on the use of props mathematics after getting lectures media and elementary mathematics learning model. By knowing the interest of prospective elementary teachers will be developed further realization of the state of the subject being studied. The method used is descriptive research, then the instruments used were questionnaires and interviews. The results of this study stated that the interest of prospective elementary teachers on the use of props after attending lectures media and elementary mathematics learning model is high over-all with a percentage of 76.70%.Keywords : Interest, Props Mathematics


Author(s):  
Meghan Shaughnessy ◽  
Nicole M. Garcia ◽  
Michaela Krug O’Neill ◽  
Sarah Kate Selling ◽  
Amber T. Willis ◽  
...  

AbstractMathematics discussions are important for helping students to develop conceptual understanding and to learn disciplinary norms and practices. In recent years, there has been increased attention to teaching prospective teachers to lead discussions with students. This paper examines the possibilities of designing a formative assessment that gathers information about prospective elementary teachers’ skills with leading problem-based mathematics discussions and makes sense of such information. A decomposition of the practice of leading discussions was developed and used to design the assessment. Nine first-year teachers who graduated from a range of different teacher education programs participated in the study. The findings reveal that our formative assessment works to gather information about teachers’ capabilities with leading discussions and that the associated tools support making sense of the information gathered. This suggests that such tools could be useful to support the formative assessment of the developing capabilities of prospective teachers.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document