A Comparison of Black and White Fathers with Implications for Parent Education

1979 ◽  
Vol 28 (1) ◽  
pp. 53 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sharon Price-Bonham ◽  
Patsy Skeen
JCSCORE ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 3 (2) ◽  
pp. 1-23 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tabitha Grier-Reed ◽  
James Houseworth ◽  
David Diehl

We examined predictors of self-reported cross-racial interactions (CRIs) by exploring ego networks for 355 Black and White undergraduates at two predominantly White institutions (PWIs). One PWI was 67% White, and the otherPWI was only 50% White. Institution, 1st year status, and racial homogeneity of student network were significant predictors of CRI. Students at the less structurally diverse university (that was 67% White) reported fewer CRIs;students with racially homogeneous networks (i.e., where all alters/connections were the same race as each other) also reported fewer CRIs. In contrast, 1st yearstudents reported a higher number of CRIs. Network homophily (i.e., where alters/connections in a network were all the same race as ego--the student himor herself) did not significantly predict CRIs, and neither did parent education or ego’s (i.e., the students’) race or gender. There was one significant difference by race; however, a higher percentage of White students had racially homogeneous networks. The importance of structural, interactional, and curricular diversity in higher education is discussed.


1982 ◽  
Vol 50 (3_suppl) ◽  
pp. 1187-1190 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sharon Price-Bonham ◽  
Patsy Skeen

Using Bem's Sex-role Inventory, sex-role attitudes were collected from 100 white and 60 black middle-class fathers. Analysis indicated that both black and white fathers held significantly more masculine sex-role attitudes toward their sons and more feminine sex-role attitudes toward their daughters. Also, white fathers expressed significantly more androgynous attitudes towards daughters and sons than did black fathers.


2020 ◽  
Vol 57 (5) ◽  
pp. 2089-2131
Author(s):  
Kenneth Shores ◽  
Ha Eun Kim ◽  
Mela Still

We characterize the extent to which Black-White gaps for multiple educational outcomes are linked across school districts in the United States. Gaps in disciplinary action, grade-level retention, classification into special education and Gifted and Talented, and Advanced Placement course-taking are large in magnitude and correlated. Racial differences in family income and parent education are strikingly consistent predictors of these gaps, and districts with large gaps in one outcome are likely to have large gaps in another. Socioeconomic and segregation variables explain 1.7 to 3.5 times more variance for achievement relative to nonachievement outcomes. Systemic patterns of racial socioeconomic inequality drive inequalities across multiple educational outcomes; however, discretionary policies at local levels are more influential for nonachievement outcomes.


2021 ◽  
Vol 70 (4) ◽  
pp. 993-1008
Author(s):  
Lorna Durrant ◽  
Nerissa LeBlanc Gillum

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document