The Question of Free and Checked Vowels in Gallic Popular Latin

PMLA ◽  
1898 ◽  
Vol 13 (1) ◽  
pp. 1-41
Author(s):  
John E. Matzke

The problem of the nature of free and checked vowels in the gallo-roman popular speech has recently been made the subject of an article published by Dr. L. E. Menger, in Publications of the Modern Language Association, x, pp. 306-341. His conclusions are that vowels are free when ' they develop: a > e, ẉ > oi, e > ie, ọ > ou, o > ue;' that they are checked when 'they retain their original forms,' and that those cases which cannot be included in either category are neither free nor checked, and are to be grouped under the general term of 'secondary developments.' It is evident that such a division begs the question at issue. The solution offered must be rejected in toto and has already received a categorical answer by Behrens in Z. f. R. Ph., xxi, p. 304. The question is however of sufficient importance to merit new consideration, and I shall try to outline in the following pages the direction in which its solution must be sought. The history of the terms free and checked and of their grammatical signification will serve as a suitable basis for the argument.

1998 ◽  
Vol 47 (3) ◽  
pp. 261-283
Author(s):  
Martin E. Marty

This article is based upon an address to the Conference on Christianity and Literature at the Annual Convention of the Modern Language Association in Toronto on 29 December 1997. The invitation asked me to comment on the public/private distinction that I make as Director of the Public Religion Project and to accent the “cultural context,” which fits my History of Culture faculty assignment and three decades of writing Context, a newsletter relating religion to culture. I was to inform it theologically, which a divinity professor is supposed to be able to do, and to show some curiosity about the literary theme, as my decades-long stint as literary editor at The Christian Century should poise me to do. Under it all my limiting job description matches a badge provided me at a conference in Tübingen, where the hosts handed out identifications marked “Theologian of History,” “Theological Historian,” and “Historical Theologian.” Mine read simply, “Historical Historian.”—MEM


PMLA ◽  
1959 ◽  
Vol 74 (2) ◽  
pp. 30-36 ◽  
Author(s):  
James Holly Hanford

A year ago last summer, when I was privately digesting the fact that I had been nominated to the presidency of the Modern Language Association of America, I happened to be sitting at the daily luncheon table with a group of teachers, some of whom were just returning from a meeting of one of the learned societies in the social sciences. The subject turned on presidential addresses and some excellent wit was broken on their demerits. For understandable reasons I kept silence while the conclusion was being arrived at that presidents were elected too late in life. There was bound to be disappointment on the part of younger men when some veteran of the profession of whom they had heard much delivered himself of commonplaces entirely unworthy of his position and of his better self. At this point one member of the group, whose own lectures are a theme of admiration, made the suggestion laughingly that every scholar who gave any promise of being ultimately chosen by his colleagues to such an office be required to write a presidential address in his younger years against the day when his talent might be required of him on an occasion like the present.


PMLA ◽  
1891 ◽  
Vol 6 (1) ◽  
pp. 64-94 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alcee Fortier

Everything concerning French Louisiana seems at this time to possess an interest for the public; and it has been my purpose in some measure, to give an account of its language, its literature, its dialects, its folklore and its inhabitants. My papers published in the Transactions of our Modern Language Association have been so kindly received that I feel encouraged to continue my labors in a field vast and fertile but difficult to explore. The work to be done is, to a great extent, one of original research and of patient investigation, and it will require several years to present a tolerably complete tableau of picturesque French Louisiana. I now desire to present another feature of the picture by giving a brief sketch of the Acadians and their dialect. It may not be amiss to begin this study by taking a bird's-eye view of the history of Acadia, from the settlement of the colony to the dispersion of the inhabitants. We shall then accompany Evangeline to the beautiful banks of the Teche and follow her canoe and that of Gabriel as they glide along its placid waters, leaving scarcely a ripple on the gentle stream which, the names of the unhappy lovers have rendered immortal.


PMLA ◽  
1903 ◽  
Vol 18 (S1) ◽  
pp. xli-lxii
Author(s):  
James Wilson Bright

This is the twentieth annual meeting of our Association, and it has been thought of as a suitable event for marking off a first period of our history. A score of years is a sufficiently conventional unit of measure to assure the form and the significance of a celebration of that character, and the nearness to the hyphen of the centuries would also lend appropriateness to our first comprehensive retrospection. But these thoughts have not been ‘submitted’ regularly to the Association; they have, on the contrary, not spread much beyond the few individual minds of their spontaneous and coincident birth, and therefore no authorized historic sketch has been prepared, no tablet has been inscribed, no bronze is to be unveiled.


PMLA ◽  
1957 ◽  
Vol 72 (2) ◽  
pp. 98-112
Author(s):  
Warner G. Rice

At a meeting of the Commission on Trends held at Atlantic City in the winter of 1950, its members agreed, according to the report of Dean Thomas Clark Pollock, then its chairman, that the commission's “function was not operational, i.e., conducting educational investigations, but what we may for want of a better term call philosophical, i.e., the discussion of educational trends or conditions affecting areas represented in the Modern Language Association of America, and the preparation of reports or brief statements presenting its views on these trends or conditions.” During the period of Dean Pollock's chairmanship no statement on educational trends was issued, since other business proved more pressing; but at a meeting held at MLA headquarters on 21 and 22 April 1952, members of the Commission agreed to discharge their obligation by compiling jointly a report on developments and issues in the academic world which could be presented at the association's winter meeting. To this document, for which the chairman must acknowledge editorial responsibility, contributions were made by Dean John S. Diekhoff, Professors John H. Fisher, Helena M. Gamer, Kathrine Roller, Gordon N. Ray, and Francis M. Rogers. The materials surveyed were extensive—books, educational journals, bulletins, reports, college catalogs and announcements, newspapers, magazines; and in addition to their wide-ranging reviews, the contributors undertook a few special inquiries. They do not, however, in publishing their findings, make any pretension to scientific thoroughness, to close statistical accuracy, or to complete disinterestedness. The scanning and digesting of the literature currently available on the subject of American education is a very large task; the selection and appraisal of what is important must depend to a considerable degree upon the judgment and experience of the collaborators. Published accounts of projected innovations, or of educational processes, do not always reveal the genuine objectives, the actual character, of the activities described, or the kind of implementation achieved; indeed an adequate knowledge of these matters cannot often be gained by any means short of direct observation and inquiry. Such opportunities were not often open to members of the commission, who have had to record, along with the facts they have collected, some impressions and educated guesses. Since, however, the commission includes in its membership deans, department chairmen, a former officer of MLA who spent many years at headquarters, and graduate teachers of long experience—all persons who have had considerable practice in gauging the state of education in several parts of the country, and all persons responsible for predicting future developments—this composite view may prove useful. The collaborators have occupied themselves chiefly with the trends apparent in higher education in the United States, and in particular with those affecting the humanities.


2020 ◽  
pp. 66-80
Author(s):  
Marcin Woliński ◽  
Witold Kieraś

The subject matter of this paper is Chronofl eks, a computer system (http:// chronofl eks.nlp.ipipan.waw.pl/) modelling Polish infl ection based on a corpus material. The system visualises changes of infl ectional paradigms of individual lexemes over time and enables examination of the variability of the frequency of infl ected form groups distinguished based on various criteria. Feeding Chronofl eks with corpus data required development of IT tools to ensure an infl ectional processing sequence of texts analogous to the ones used for modern language; they comprise a transcriber, a morphological analyser, and a tagger. The work was performed on data from three historical periods (1601–1772, 1830–1918, and modern ones) elaborated in independent projects. Therefore, fi nding a common manner of describing data from the individual periods was a signifi cant element of the work. Keywords: electronic text corpus – natural language processing – infl ection of Polish – history of language


1962 ◽  
Vol 9 (1) ◽  
pp. 72-86
Author(s):  
K. C. Masterman

It is over fifty years now since the formation of the Joint Committee on Grammatical Terminology, and the presentation of its Report and it seems to be high time that teachers of languages considered, first, how successful they have been in carrying out its recommendations, and secondly, what modifications are called for in the light of more recent knowledge. The Committee was a strong one, with E. A. Sonnenschein in the chair and R. S. Conway as the original secretary, both representing the Classical Association; the Modern Language Association, the English Association, and various educational bodies sent equally distinguished representatives. Their recommendations, apart from a few reservations by individuals on comparatively minor points, were unanimous, and have on the whole won fairly general neglect, not as a rule through disagreement with them, but simply because it was less trouble to go on using whatever terms one had been in the habit of using before, however inconvenient, confusing, or inexact they might be. Before discussing the recommendations it seems desirable to glance at the history of the ‘old’ terminology in order to see what was unsatisfactory about it and why it needed to be changed.


1997 ◽  
Vol 38 (2) ◽  
pp. 49-88 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michael Gamer

As the most critically lauded dramatist of her time, Joanna Baillie recently has received considerable attention from critics interested in arguing that our neglect of Romantic drama has arisen from “conventional and mistaken assumptions about its strategies and principles.” In a recent issue of Wordsworth Circle devoted exclusively to Romantic drama, Baillie figures in three of its seven articles as a central dramatist of the period, while Jeffrey Cox devotes an entire section of his introduction in Seven Gothic Dramas 1789—1825 (1992) to her work. Even more recently, she has been the subject of special sessions of recent Modern Language Association meetings, and an edition of her Selected Works is scheduled to be published by Pickering and Chatto Press in 1998.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document