The Availability of Raw Materials for near Eastern Cylinder Seals during the Akkadian, Post Akaddian and Ur III Periods

Iraq ◽  
1993 ◽  
Vol 55 ◽  
pp. 77 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. Sax ◽  
D. Collon ◽  
M. N. Leese
1987 ◽  
Vol 91 (1) ◽  
pp. 143
Author(s):  
Edith Porada ◽  
Beatrice Teissier
Keyword(s):  

2018 ◽  
pp. 49-74
Author(s):  
Jacob L. Dahl ◽  
Jonathon S. Hare ◽  
Kate Kelley ◽  
Kirk Martinez ◽  
David Young

1966 ◽  
Vol 85 (3) ◽  
pp. 362
Author(s):  
Machteld J. Mellink ◽  
Briggs Buchanan
Keyword(s):  

Iraq ◽  
1978 ◽  
Vol 40 (1) ◽  
pp. 41 ◽  
Author(s):  
P. R. S. Moorey ◽  
O. R. Gurney
Keyword(s):  

Thousands of texts, written over a period of three thousand years on papyri and potsherds, in Egyptian, Greek, Latin, Aramaic, Hebrew, Persian, and other languages, have transformed our knowledge of many aspects of life in the ancient Mediterranean and Near Eastern worlds. This book provides an introduction to the world of these ancient documents and literary texts, ranging from the raw materials of writing to the languages used, from the history of papyrology to its future, and from practical help in reading papyri to frank opinions about the nature of the work of papyrologists. It takes account of the important changes experienced by the discipline, especially within the last thirty years. The book includes work by twenty-seven international experts and more than one hundred illustrations.


1986 ◽  
Vol 106 (4) ◽  
pp. 834
Author(s):  
Pierre Amiet ◽  
Beatrice Teissier
Keyword(s):  

1996 ◽  
Vol 39 (1) ◽  
pp. 1-41 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mario Liverani

AbstractThe reconstruction of ancient Near Eastern history has mainly concentrated on urban (and especially palace) environments, leaving the rural landscape outside these analyses. Recent advances in archaeological and palaeobotanical fields greatly help in the recovery of the general outlines of rural exploitation in Mesopotamia and the surrounding regions; yet they cannot but miss the details of the individual exploitation units (fields and orchards), whose size and shape can be reconstructed on the basis of textual data such as cadastral texts (and other administrative recordings) and legal texts (related to the transfer of landed properties). Continuing the author's earlier work on the shape of fields in Ur III (ca. 2100-2000 B.C.), based on cadastral documents from Lagash province in lower Mesopotamia, this article examines, by way of ‘gross’ generalization and occasional exemplification, the entire history of the Mesopotamian landscape from the first administrative landscape in “late-Uruk” documents (ca. 3000 B.C.), down to the Neo-Babylonian documents of the Archaemenid period (ca. 500 B.C.).


2007 ◽  
pp. 55-82 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nick Kardulias

As originally formulated, the world-systems model postulated a relationship in which core states exploited peripheries for raw materials and made the latter into dependent satellites. This approach views indigenous people in peripheries as passive recipients at the mercy of political and economic forces beyond their control. While in many cases the impetus for change was from cores to peripheries, there were certainly instances in which the margins actively (and occasionally successfully) resisted incorporation. At times, they also had the ability to select the precise form of their incorporation. While in many cases this did not alter the consequences for indigenous people, there were occasions when natives not only reacted successfully, but also outlined the terms of the encounter. This is a process that I call negotiated peripherality. Underlying this perspective is a biological analogy: just as biological populations experience the greatest change at the borders of their territories where the effects of gene flow are felt first and most dramatically, so too do cultural changes occur at an accelerated rate in contact zones. This paper explores the nature of negotiated change through two case studies. The archaeological example examines how ancient inhabitants of Cyprus selectively adopted features from the Near Eastern and Greek cultures for whose worldsystems the island served as a marginal periphery. The second example is anethnohistoric study of how Native Americans managed the terms of their involvement in the fur trade with Europeans. Both cases demonstrate the active role of peripheral people as decision-makers.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document