A Simple Proof of the Hook Length Formula

2004 ◽  
Vol 111 (8) ◽  
pp. 700 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kenneth Glass ◽  
Chi-Keung Ng
Keyword(s):  
Simple Proof ◽  
Hook Length

A Simple Proof of the Hook Length Formula

2004 ◽  
Vol 111 (8) ◽  
pp. 700-704
Author(s):  
Kenneth Glass ◽  
Chi-Keung Ng
Keyword(s):  
Simple Proof ◽  
Hook Length

scholarly journals The Weighted Hook Length Formula III: Shifted Tableaux

10.37236/588 ◽  
2011 ◽  
Vol 18 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Matjaž Konvalinka
Keyword(s):  
Simple Proof ◽  
Hook Length ◽  
Bijective Proof ◽  
Branching Rule ◽  
Shifted Tableaux

Recently, a simple proof of the hook length formula was given via the branching rule. In this paper, we extend the results to shifted tableaux. We give a bijective proof of the branching rule for the hook lengths for shifted tableaux; present variants of this rule, including weighted versions; and make the first tentative steps toward a bijective proof of the hook length formula for $d$-complete posets.

scholarly journals The role of the FliK molecular ruler in hook-length control inSalmonella enterica

2010 ◽  
Vol 75 (5) ◽  
pp. 1272-1284 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marc Erhardt ◽  
Takanori Hirano ◽  
Yichu Su ◽  
Koushik Paul ◽  
Daniel H. Wee ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Hook Length ◽  
Molecular Ruler

scholarly journals On the growth and zeros of polynomials attached to arithmetic functions

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bernhard Heim ◽  
Markus Neuhauser
Keyword(s):  
Lie Algebras ◽  
Chebyshev Polynomials ◽  
Fourier Coefficients ◽  
Arithmetic Functions ◽  
Zeros Of Polynomials ◽  
Simple Complex ◽  
Hook Length ◽  
Moderate Growth ◽  
Growth Properties ◽  
Sum Of Divisors

AbstractIn this paper we investigate growth properties and the zero distribution of polynomials attached to arithmetic functions g and h, where g is normalized, of moderate growth, and $$0<h(n) \le h(n+1)$$ 0 < h ( n ) ≤ h ( n + 1 ) . We put $$P_0^{g,h}(x)=1$$ P 0 g , h ( x ) = 1 and $$\begin{aligned} P_n^{g,h}(x) := \frac{x}{h(n)} \sum _{k=1}^{n} g(k) \, P_{n-k}^{g,h}(x). \end{aligned}$$ P n g , h ( x ) : = x h ( n ) ∑ k = 1 n g ( k ) P n - k g , h ( x ) . As an application we obtain the best known result on the domain of the non-vanishing of the Fourier coefficients of powers of the Dedekind $$\eta $$ η -function. Here, g is the sum of divisors and h the identity function. Kostant’s result on the representation of simple complex Lie algebras and Han’s results on the Nekrasov–Okounkov hook length formula are extended. The polynomials are related to reciprocals of Eisenstein series, Klein’s j-invariant, and Chebyshev polynomials of the second kind.

scholarly journals A simple proof of Andrews’s 5 F 4 evaluation

2013 ◽  
Vol 36 (1-2) ◽  
pp. 165-170 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ira M. Gessel
Keyword(s):  
Simple Proof

A simple proof of existence of weak and statistical solutions of Navier–Stokes equations

1992 ◽  
Vol 436 (1896) ◽  
pp. 1-11 ◽  
Keyword(s):  
Weak Solution ◽  
Initial Data ◽  
Natural Number ◽  
Simple Proof ◽  
Stokes Equations ◽  
Galerkin Approximation ◽  
Navier Stokes ◽  
Navier Stokes Equations ◽  
Existence Proofs ◽  
Statistical Solutions

The Galerkin approximation to the Navier–Stokes equations in dimension N , where N is an infinite non-standard natural number, is shown to have standard part that is a weak solution. This construction is uniform with respect to non-standard representation of the initial data, and provides easy existence proofs for statistical solutions.

scholarly journals A representation theorem for the linear quasi-differential equation(py′)′+qy=0

2000 ◽  
Vol 23 (8) ◽  
pp. 579-584
Author(s):  
J. G. O'Hara
Keyword(s):  
Differential Equation ◽  
Comparison Theorem ◽  
Simple Proof ◽  
Representation Theorem ◽  
Second Order ◽  
Order Linear

We establish a representation forqin the second-order linear quasi-differential equation(py′)′+qy=0. We give a number of applications, including a simple proof of Sturm's comparison theorem.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document