Marginal q, Tobin's q, Cash Flow, and Investment

2004 ◽  
Vol 70 (3) ◽  
pp. 512 ◽  
Author(s):  
Klaus Gugler ◽  
Dennis C. Mueller ◽  
B. Burcin Yurtoglu
Keyword(s):  
2004 ◽  
Vol 70 (3) ◽  
pp. 512-531
Author(s):  
Klaus Gugler ◽  
Dennis C. Mueller ◽  
B. Burcin Yurtoglu
Keyword(s):  

Author(s):  
Stephen R. Bond ◽  
Alexander Klemm ◽  
Rain Newton-Smith ◽  
Murtaza Syed ◽  
Gertjan W. Vlieghe

1995 ◽  
Vol 19 (6) ◽  
pp. 1005-1023 ◽  
Author(s):  
Steven B. Perfect ◽  
David R. Peterson ◽  
Pamela P. Peterson

2018 ◽  
Vol 22 (2) ◽  
pp. 139
Author(s):  
Rita Amelinda

The purpose of this research is to measure the influence between agency conflict’s factors to the value of the firm with dividend policy as the moderating variable. Some of variables which are used in this research such as Free Cash Flow Ratio, Leverage, Return on Asset, GCG’s Implementation (CGPI), Dividend Policy, danValue of The Firm (Tobin’s Q). This research sample consisted of 126 observations which are the listed company in Indonesia Stock Exchange (IDX) during 2008-2014 period and they also are the company with the best GCG index. The results showed thatFree Cash Flow Ratio, Leverage, Return on Asset, GCG’s Implementation (CGPI), Dividend Policy have significant effect simultaneously on Value of The Firm (Tobin’s Q). While in partial, only GCG’s Implementation (CGPI) which doesn’t has significant effect onValue of The Firm (Tobin’s Q). On the other hand, dividend policy significantly moderated the influence of the other 4 independent variables to the value of the firm.


2012 ◽  
Vol 02 (01) ◽  
pp. 1250001 ◽  
Author(s):  
Andrew B. Abel ◽  
Janice C. Eberly

We develop a model in which the opportunity for a firm to upgrade its technology to the frontier (at a cost) leads to growth options in the firm's value; that is, a firm's value is the sum of value generated by its current technology plus the value of the option to upgrade. Variation in the technological frontier leads to variation in firm value that is unrelated to current cash flow and investment, though variation in firm value anticipates future upgrades and investment. We simulate this model and show that, consistent with the empirical literature, in situations in which growth options are important, regressions of investment on Tobin's Q and cash flow yield small positive coefficients on Q and larger coefficients on cash flow. We also show that growth options increase the volatility of firm value relative to the volatility of cash flow.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document