Provincialism and The English “Ancien Regime”: Samuel Pipe-Wolferstan and “The Confessional State,” 1776–1820

1989 ◽  
Vol 21 (3) ◽  
pp. 389-425
Author(s):  
John Money

Imagine, if you will, a ship at sea. At a distance, it could be Jason and the Argonauts, or the Flying Dutchman, or even Captain Ahab. By the cut of its jib as it looms out of the mist, however, it seems rather to be a sieve, such as that in which the Jumblies once put forth. On the poop, sextant in hand, his grizzled features set in Churchillian grimace but instantly recognizable by the ancient Connecticut watchcap which tops them, stands—no, not Walter Mitty—but Hexter the Navigator. As a veteran of many earlier voyages, real and imaginary, he has a longer memory than his shipmates. He thinks this is a Liberty Ship, and he is trying to chart the course laid out in the sailing instructions, originally constituted by a long line of sea-lawyers and perfected by Victorian hydrographers. Right forrard, another ancient mariner, of the kind the lower deck calls Three-badge Killick (a leading seaman of long service who has never made it to Petty Officer), swings the lead. He is Plumb. In the crow's nest, bo'suns Tawney and Hill stand watch with their mates Stone and Thompson. As boy seamen long ago, they, too, were brought up on the old sailing instructions; but having, before the present voyage, served in capital ships, they consider that they have progressed far beyond such common lore. So wise are they indeed that they are convinced that this, too, is a Capital Ship, which, as everybody knows, can only sail forwards, and can therefore have only one destination. In the rigging, the rest of the fo'csle hands, a rabble of cabin boys and greenhorns press-ganged in 1968, who have barely passed for able seaman and still need the old guard to show them the ropes, likewise scan the horizon for the inevitable landfall and keep a weather eye open for that ill-omened denizen of these waters, Namier's Albatross. The intrepid helmsman, however, just as young but experienced beyond his years, knows better. Apprenticed to a line of tars that stretches back to old admiral Clarendon, he has learnt his craft the hard way, at the rope's end, and he has very little use for the sailing instructions of Liberty Ships or the great circle routes programmed, rhumb line by reductionist rhumb line, into the automatic pilots of their capital counterparts. He is Revisionist, a most unteleologic Ulysses, content (the journey not Ithaca's the thing) to sail his narrative barque (Narrenschiff?) before the winds of change for ever. Only one thing jars this whimsical homeric simile. Proof though he is against Circe and her reifications, our Ulysses has still his achilles' heel. Perhaps because he has come up through the hawse-hole himself, he has occasional bouts of nautical nostalgie de la boue: like Bertram, the sociologist of the sea in “Dry Cargo,” the Navigator's hoary parable on Doing History (another time, another voyage), he itches to pull on a pair of footnotes, go below and sample the bilgewater which, this being after all a sieve, slops around the hold.

Author(s):  
Philip Dwyer

In the face of the long line of political failures that was the Revolution, the foundation of the Empire in 1804 was an attempt to create a new polity, a third way between radical republicanism and royalism. The regime created by Napoleon was a curious mixture of the modern and the traditional, a new social and political fusion between the old and the new France. The Empire, and the reforms that emanated from it, had its roots in the Revolution. Despite the opposition that they sometimes encountered, they were all conceived as instruments of social and political cohesion. The imperial regime represented a new polity that both broke with the past and relied on ancien régime institutions and people to help implant the new order.


1968 ◽  
Vol 23 (1) ◽  
pp. 49-68 ◽  
Author(s):  
Guy Thuillier

La pollution des eaux n'est pas un phénomène récent : jusqu'au début du xxe siècle, et même après, l'usage d'eaux malsaines était quasi général, et la rareté de l'eau — dans les campagnes comme dans les villes — avait des conséquences sociales et médicales non négligeables. Certes cette histoire de l'eau est difficile à écrire, et elle tente peu les historiens, précisément parce qu'elle touche à cet « invisible quotidien » qui laisse peu de traces. Pourtant elle engage toute l'histoire des conditions matérielles de vie, l'histoire démographique et même l'histoire des mentalités : la révolution de l'eau a été trop diffuse pour qu'on en puisse aisément saisir toute l'étendue . Ne peut-on, cependant, pour une région limitée, tenter de dégager à grands traits les conditions de cet « ancien régime » de l'eau ?


1972 ◽  
Vol 27 (6) ◽  
pp. 1389-1399
Author(s):  
Jean Delumeau

« L'Anjou, écrivait un religieux à la fin du xvne siècle est une des plus petites provinces de la France, et il est très certain qu'un homme qui chemine bien peut aller en un jour d' Angers aux extrémités de la province, excepté vers Craon et La Roe. » A François Lebrun, auteur de l'admirable synthèse que viennent de publier les Éditions Mouton, il aura fallu une bonne dizaine d'années pour parcourir en tous sens les 9 362 km2, les 16 élections et les 541 paroisses de l' Anjou d' Ancien Régime, en connaître les terroirs, les contrastes', les misères et les espoirs. Le parti adopté est le même que ceux précédemment choisis par P. Goubert et E. Le Roy Ladurie pour le Beauvaisis et le Languedoc, plus récemment par R. Fossier pour la Picardie.


1959 ◽  
Vol 74 (6) ◽  
pp. 553
Author(s):  
Harcourt Brown ◽  
David T. Pottinger

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document