scholarly journals Early Weaning and Length of Supplementation Effects on Beef Calves

2002 ◽  
Vol 55 (4) ◽  
pp. 327 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. J. Pordomingo
Keyword(s):  
jpa ◽  
1991 ◽  
Vol 4 (4) ◽  
pp. 468-471 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. F. Grimes ◽  
Thomas B. Turner
Keyword(s):  

2003 ◽  
Vol 2003 ◽  
pp. 112-112
Author(s):  
S. P Marsh ◽  
A. M. Mackenzie ◽  
E. L. James

Artificial rearing is a common practice for rearing calves from the dairy herd destined for beef production. In commercial practice calves are typically weaned from 5 to 9 weeks old. There are four criteria that can be used to determine weaning time: - age, compound feed intake, liveweight, and, milk price and quota policy. Late weaning systems are based on the theory of giving the calf the best possible start in life, but are costly with high milk intakes (Davis and Drackley, 1998). Hence emphasis is usually placed on early weaning of the calf and encouraging concentrate intake. The objective of this study was to determine the effect of weaning at either 6 or 8 weeks old on the performance dairy-bred beef calves.


2016 ◽  
Vol 94 (suppl_1) ◽  
pp. 61-61
Author(s):  
J. D. Arthington ◽  
J. M. B. Vendramini

1987 ◽  
Vol 67 (2) ◽  
pp. 327-336 ◽  
Author(s):  
D. B. KARREN ◽  
J. A. BASARAB ◽  
T. L. CHURCH

A study was conducted to evaluate the effects of preconditioning beef calves. In 1982, each of two producers allocated 100 cow-calf pairs to the study while in 1983, 130 cow-calf pairs were included on Farm 1 and 151 on Farm 2. In 1982, approximately even numbers of cow-calf pairs were randomly assigned to either a preconditioning (PC) or a regular (RG) program. These same groups were maintained in 1983. The length of the period from early weaning to shipment (preconditioning period) was 30 d (PC30) in 1982 and either 30 or 42 d (PC42) in 1983. At the end of the preconditioning period, calves from both farms were shipped to the same feedlot for 68- and 95-d tests in 1982 and 1983, respectively. PC calves gained faster than RG calves during the preconditioning period in five of the six farms by year by treatment situations. Preconditioning calves for 42 d rather than 30 d had no effect on either preconditioning gain or farm to feedlot weight loss. The cost of preconditioning ranged from $29.65 to $38.77 head−1 for PC30 calves and from $41.95 to $49.08 head−1 for PC42 calves. The price differential required by the cow-calf producer to break-even on PC calves ranged from + 5.0C kg−1 for PC30 calves to + 11.0C kg−1 for PC42 calves. Weaning treatment had no effect on either pregnancy rate the following year or on calving interval. In 1982 RG calves gained 0.13 kg d− more in the feedlot than PC30 calves. In 1983 PC30, PC42 and RG calves gained similarly. Treatment for illness of PC30 calves during the feedlot phase was 13.7% lower than RG calves in 1982. In 1983, treatment rate was reduced 42.0% for PC30 calves and 60.6% for PC42 calves. Preconditioning for 42 d rather than 30 d had no effect on feedlot growth or health performance. Cost of gain was 5.0C kg−1 less for PC calves than for RG calves in both 1982 and 1983. Key words: Calves (beef), weaning (early), preconditioning, farm, feedlot


2019 ◽  
Vol 20 ◽  
Author(s):  
Luiz Orcirio Fialho de Oliveira ◽  
Urbano Gomes Pinto de Abreu ◽  
Rodrigo da Costa Gomes ◽  
Ériklis Nogueira ◽  
Juliana Correa Borges Silva ◽  
...  

Abstract Early weaning (EW) has been adopted in cattle breeding farms in Pantanal as a strategy to increase the rate of pregnancy in cows. The primary income of these properties is the production of beef calves, and the price of these animals depends on their weight. Therefore, the calves subjected to EW should present weight similar to or higher than those of calves subjected to conventional weaning (CW). This study aimed to evaluate the productive performance of pure (Nellore) calves and crossbred (Nellore/Angus) calves reared in the Pantanal and subjected to either EW or CW. After EW, the calves were supplemented with concentrate at 1 kg/animal/day (low-energy diet) or 1% of live weight (high-energy diet). The weights adjusted to 300 days of age were higher for EW calves fed the high-energy diet (p<0.01) in both genetic groups. No significant differences were observed in the weight of EW animals fed the low-energy diet and CW animals (p>0.01), and animal weight was 241.17 and 236.27 kg in crossbred calves and 184.44 and 189.78 in Nellore calves, respectively. The EW adopted in this experimental model did not affect the productive performance of calves raised in the Pantanal.


2007 ◽  
Vol 110 (1-2) ◽  
pp. 148-153 ◽  
Author(s):  
S. Galindo-Gonzalez ◽  
J.D. Arthington ◽  
J.V. Yelich ◽  
G.R. Hansen ◽  
G.C. Lamb ◽  
...  

1986 ◽  
Vol 66 (2) ◽  
pp. 349-360 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. A. BASARAB ◽  
F. S. NOVAK ◽  
D. B. KARREN

A study was conducted to determine the effects of early weaning and preconditioning to feedlot on calf gain and the effects of early weaning on cow weight and reproductive performance. A total of 390 cow-calf pairs in 1982 and 460 in 1983, representing four breed, three age-of-dam groups and two-sex-of-calf groups, were randomly assigned to either an early weaned (EW) or a late weaned (LW) group. In the fall of each year, EW calves were weaned 1 mo before LW calves and fed grain (up to 4.8 kg head−1 d−1) and hay during this period. EW calves gained approximately 0.5 kg d−1 less over the 1 mo fall test period than LW calves in 1982 (0.16 vs. 0.75 kg d−1) and 1983 (0.05 vs. 0.58 kg d−1). EW cows gained 0.32 kg d−1 more during this same period than LW cows in 1982 (0.86 vs. 0.54 kg d−1) and lost 0.21 kg d−1 less in 1983 (−0.10 vs. −0.31 kg d−1). These differences in gain did not result in significant weight differences between EW and LW cows entering the winter feeding period in either year. EW and LW cows lost a similar amount of weight over the winter feeding period in 1982–1983 (−0.13 vs. −0.12 kg d−1) and had the same weight after calving in 1983. However, during the winter feeding period of 1983–1984, EW cows lost less weight than LW cows (−0.22 vs. −0.30 kg d−1) and, thus, weighed 27.3 kg more than LW cows after calving in 1984 (468.3 vs. 441.0 kg). Weaning treatment had no effect on pregnancy rate, calf crop percentage or calving interval. Weaning treatment also had no effect on cow weight and gain, calf birth date and weight, calving interval or calf preweaning gain the following year. Interactions between weaning treatment and breed, age of dam or sex of calf were absent for most weight and weight gain parameters and for calving intervals. Calf weights were affected by breed, age of dam and sex of calf while calf gains over the fall test were affected by age of dam. Cow weights were affected by breed and age, calf crop percentage by breed and calving interval by age. Breed, age of cow and sex of calf effects for all other parameters were not significant. Key words: Beef cattle, beef calves, early weaning, preconditioning


jpa ◽  
1991 ◽  
Vol 4 (4) ◽  
pp. 464-468 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. F. Grimes ◽  
Thomas B. Turner

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document