scholarly journals Some Vegetation Responses to Selected Livestock Grazing Strategies, Edwards Plateau, Texas

1988 ◽  
Vol 41 (2) ◽  
pp. 108 ◽  
Author(s):  
Thomas L. Thurow ◽  
Wilbert H. Blackburn ◽  
Charles A. Taylor
2013 ◽  
Vol 66 (1) ◽  
pp. 34-42 ◽  
Author(s):  
K.N. Dalldorf ◽  
S.R. Swanson ◽  
D.F. Kozlowski ◽  
K.M. Schmidt ◽  
R.S. Shane ◽  
...  

2004 ◽  
Vol 55 (3) ◽  
pp. 279 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. Dorrough ◽  
A. Yen ◽  
V. Turner ◽  
S. G. Clark ◽  
J. Crosthwaite ◽  
...  

There is an increasing interest in the development of livestock grazing management strategies that achieve environmental sustainability and maintain or improve the long-term production capacity of commercial grazing systems. In temperate Australia, these strategies are generally focussed on reducing perennial pasture decline, soil loss, acidity, and salinity. An additional challenge facing land managers and researchers is developing grazing strategies that also maintain and enhance local and regional biodiversity. However, few studies have assessed the compatibility of management practices for maintaining long-term productivity and biodiversity conservation. We still have only a very basic understanding of the effects of different grazing strategies and pasture management on biodiversity and this is a major impediment to the development of appropriate and compatible best management practice. We argue that although there is an increasing desire to find management strategies that protect and enhance biodiversity without hindering long-term agricultural production, in many cases this may not be possible. Current knowledge suggests that compatibility is most likely to be achieved using low-input systems in low productivity (fragile) landscapes, whereas in highly productive (robust) landscapes there is less opportunity for integration of productive land-use and biodiversity conservation. There is an urgent need for improved communication and collaboration between agronomic and ecological researchers and research agencies to ensure that future programs consider sustainability in terms of biodiversity as well as pasture and livestock productivity and soil and water health.


1984 ◽  
Vol 37 (3) ◽  
pp. 265 ◽  
Author(s):  
G. R. McCalla ◽  
W. H. Blackburn ◽  
L. B. Merrill

2019 ◽  
Vol 97 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. 53-54 ◽  
Author(s):  
Samantha R Hays ◽  
Pete D Teel ◽  
Heath D Starns ◽  
Nick Garza ◽  
Robert Moen ◽  
...  

Abstract Multi-species livestock grazing is a common practice in the Edwards Plateau of Texas. Winter demands on livestock are high because of forage quality and quantity limitations and stresses of tick parasitism. Our objective was to assess winter-active tick burden on livestock and gauge effectiveness of a pour-on synthetic pyrethroid acaricide. At the Sonora AgriLife Station, 26 Bos taurus crossbred heifers (260 ± 6 kg) and 28 Dorper ewes (42 ± 1 kg) were maintained on 97.125 hectares of rangeland. Tick burden was assessed by individual animal inspection on: 12-18-2017, 01-05-2018, 01-122018, 01-26-2018, 02-09-2018, 02-16-2018, 02-23-2018, and 03-08-2018. Trial 1 acaricide treatment was applied 01-05-2018 on heifers and ewes chosen randomly to serve in the non-treated control (13 heifers; 14 ewes) or acaricide-treated (13 heifers; 14 ewes) groups. Trial 2 acaricide treatment was applied 02-16-2018 using a switchback design. Tick species included Amblyomma americanum, Dermacentor albipictus, and Ixodes scapularis. Tick burden differences were determined by analysis of variance procedures. There were no differences in tick burden on heifers or ewes prior to acaricide application for Trial 1 nor Trial 2 (P > 0.276, 0.002 ± 0.46; P > 0.354, 0.002 ± 0.11 and P > 0.606, 0.002 ± 0.05; P > 0.705, 0.001 ± 1.34, respectively). There were no differences (P > 0.149) between acaricide-treated (0.519 ± 0.05) and non-treated control (0.644 ± 0.07) heifers in Trial 1 nor Trial 2 (0.759 ± 0.07 and 0.404 ± 0.04, respectively). Similarly, there were no differences (P > 0.997) between acaricide-treated (2.964 ± 0.31) and non-treated control (2.965 ± 0.3) ewes in Trial 1 nor Trial 2 (1.015 ± 0.13 and 5.563 ± 0.45, respectively). We conclude ticks challenge the well-being and production in overwintering livestock in the Edwards Plateau. Alternative acaricides should be evaluated for efficacy and efficiency in these production systems


1984 ◽  
Vol 37 (4) ◽  
pp. 291 ◽  
Author(s):  
G. R. McCalla ◽  
W. H. Blackburn ◽  
L. B. Merrill

1998 ◽  
Vol 78 (2) ◽  
pp. 191-198 ◽  
Author(s):  
L. Fitch ◽  
B. W. Adams

Our paper provides an ecological perspective on the interrelationship between livestock grazing and riparian areas through a review of topical literature. We also describe the Alberta Riparian Habitat Management Project (also known as "Cows and Fish"), and draw upon our experience to provide a perspective on future riparian management actions. Those actions should begin with an understanding that prairie landscapes evolved with herbivores, in a grazing regime timed and controlled by season and climatic fluctuations where grazing by native grazers was followed by variable rest periods. Prevailing range management principles represent an attempt to imitate the natural system and describe ecologically based grazing systems. Traditionally, range management guidelines have focused on grazing practices and impacts in upland, terrestrial rangelands, with a lack of attention devoted to riparian areas.Three decades of riparian investigation have quantified the effect unmanaged livestock grazing can have on range productivity and watershed function. We contend that suitable grazing strategies for riparian areas will be developed first by understanding the function of riparian systems and then by applying range management principles to develop riparian grazing strategies. A key step towards determining the fit of livestock grazing is an understanding of the formation of riparian systems and their ecological function. We describe riparian structure, function and process to provide linkages between livestock grazing, riparian vegetation health and stream channel dynamics. We summarize the effects of unmanaged livestock grazing on riparian habitats and fish and wildlife populations. The general conclusion is that unmanaged grazing results in overuse and degradation of riparian areas. The literature provides several options for the development of riparian grazing strategies. We provide an overview of strategies suitable for riparian areas in Southern Alberta which should maintain ecological function and sustained use. Key words: Riparian, grazing management, grazing systems, riparian grazing


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document