Habitat Use and Activity Budgets of Greater Snow Geese in Spring

1988 ◽  
Vol 52 (2) ◽  
pp. 191 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gilles Gauthier ◽  
Yves Bedard ◽  
Jean Bedard
2005 ◽  
Vol 11 (6) ◽  
pp. 856-868 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gilles Gauthier ◽  
Jean-Francois Giroux ◽  
Austin Reed ◽  
Arnaud Bechet ◽  
Luc Belanger

2006 ◽  
Vol 84 (8) ◽  
pp. 1096-1103 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. Mainguy ◽  
G. Gauthier ◽  
J.-F. Giroux ◽  
I. Duclos

Many precocial birds make long-distance movements with their young after hatch to reach the best foraging sites. On Bylot Island, Nunavut, a large number of Greater Snow Goose ( Chen caerulescens atlantica L., 1758) families move 30 km from the main nesting colony (MNC) to reach the main brood-rearing area (MBR) soon after hatch. Geese moving from the MNC to the MBR generally rear lighter and smaller goslings than geese that avoid this movement by both nesting and rearing their brood at the MBR. In this study, we tested the hypotheses that use of low-quality habitats and an increase in the time spent walking at the expense of foraging during movements could explain the reduced growth of goslings in those families. We conducted visual observations to compare habitat use and selection as well as behaviour of geese during brood movements from the MNC to the MBR (i.e., at a transit area) with those of families that had already settled at the MBR. We also conducted aerial tracking to monitor habitat use of 16 radio-marked females during and after brood movements. Streams, wet polygons, and lakes, considered high-quality habitats in terms of feeding opportunities and predator refuges, were preferred, while upland, a low-quality habitat, was avoided at both the transit area and the MBR. However, broods were found in the upland habitat more often during movements than once settled on a rearing site. The behaviour of unmarked geese at the transit site did not differ from that of geese at the MBR. We suggest that reduced food intake in low-quality habitats during movements, but not the increase in time spent walking, may explain the reduction in growth observed at fledging in goslings moving from the MNC to the MBR.


Copeia ◽  
2012 ◽  
Vol 2012 (3) ◽  
pp. 465-471 ◽  
Author(s):  
Matthew S. Lattanzio ◽  
Thomas C. LaDuke

Animals ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 10 (11) ◽  
pp. 2026
Author(s):  
Jilian M. Fazio ◽  
Tony Barthel ◽  
Elizabeth W. Freeman ◽  
Kay Garlick-Ott ◽  
Anne Scholle ◽  
...  

Accredited zoos and aquariums value superior animal husbandry and strive to ensure that the physical, psychological, and social needs of animals are met. In North America, the Association of Zoos and Aquariums (AZA) relies on species-specific standards to ensure facilities provide the best care for collection animals. The AZA also makes explicit recommendations for long-term monitoring of welfare. Data collected through behavioral observations can be used to modify management as animals respond over time to social, environmental, or physical changes. In long-lived, social species like elephants, it is particularly important to document herd dynamics, calf development, geriatric health, and social bonds throughout their lifetimes. The Smithsonian’s National Zoological Park housed one male and six female Asian elephants in dynamic social groupings. Behavioral observations were conducted on all elephants for two years using two methods involving ZooMonitor, closed circuit cameras, and camera traps. The goal was to compare how these two methods function to provide individual activity budgets, habitat use, and social interactions. Methodologies such as these, alone or in combination, have the potential to produce valuable data about potential changes in welfare over time in a zoological setting and can be performed either by staff or volunteers with high reliability.


1992 ◽  
Vol 56 (1) ◽  
pp. 43 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ray T. Alisauskas ◽  
C. Davison Ankney

1984 ◽  
Vol 48 (4) ◽  
pp. 1085 ◽  
Author(s):  
William C. Hobaugh

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document