Interspecific Dominance and Burrow Use in the Two Species of the Parthenogenetic Lizard Complex Cnemidophorus laredoensis (Teiidae)

2002 ◽  
Vol 47 (1) ◽  
pp. 21
Author(s):  
Mark A. Paulissen
1985 ◽  
Vol 33 (2) ◽  
pp. 428-435 ◽  
Author(s):  
George C. Millikan ◽  
Philip Gaddis ◽  
H. Ronald Pulliam

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Karleah K. Berris ◽  
Steven J. B. Cooper ◽  
William G. Breed ◽  
Joshua R. Berris ◽  
Susan M. Carthew
Keyword(s):  

Herpetologica ◽  
2003 ◽  
Vol 59 (3) ◽  
pp. 311-321 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jeannine Ott Eubanks ◽  
William K. Michener ◽  
Craig Guyer

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
◽  
Ilse Corkery

<p>Some of the key relationships in the life of an organism are interactions with individuals of other species within the community, for example, negative interactions such as predation and competition are well known to shape natural communities. Positive interactions also have well documented influences, such as intertidal seaweed canopies extending the distribution of many organisms to higher tidal heights, by reducing thermal and desiccation stresses. However, investigating interactions and measuring their significance for fitness is notoriously difficult. For example, several groups of fish are known to ‘clean’ other fish species by feeding on their ectoparasites, a mutually beneficial arrangement. However, foraging by cleaners can damage scales of their hosts and this interaction can become parasitic in times of low ectoparasite abundance. Using both field and laboratory data, I investigated factors that influenced the dynamics of an unusual vertebrate association, the cohabitation of tuatara and fairy prions in a burrow. The end goal was to contribute to the understanding of the classification of this association. The fairy prion is a seabird that comes to land only for the breeding season and the tuatara is a burrowing reptile, active primarily at night in a temperate climate. Specifically, I measured the effects that this association had on tuatara thermoregulation, and demonstrated the difficulty in applying that information to categorize a complex interaction. Investigations into the temporal and spatial habitat of the tuatara, and the degree to which this influenced thermal opportunities, revealed that mean tuatara body temperatures were always within mean environmental temperatures. Males and females did not differ in mean body temperature or effectiveness of thermoregulation. Body size did not predict body temperature or cooling rates, but heating rates were influenced, with larger animals heating faster than smaller individuals. The presence of a fairy prion in a burrow increased humidity within the burrow, and tuatara that occupied burrows containing a fairy prion were able to maintain up to 1.8°C higher body temperatures through the night during the austral summer months. Thus, burrow use behaviour and burrow selection had greater influences on tuatara body temperature than an individual’s sex or size. Experimental evidence revealed that tuatara are capable of adjusting their habitat selection behaviour in response to different humidity constraints. More time was spent outside the burrows and tuatara were more active under humid laboratory conditions. Use of the burrow by tuatara almost halved the time that fairy prions spent at the burrow with their chick, indicating that tuatara were having a negative effect on fairy prions’ use of their burrow. There was no evidence to support the fact that fairy prions were gaining any fitness benefits from their association with tuatara. Thus, we cannot call this interaction a commensalism or a mutualism. In certain instances, it may be that this interaction is best classed as a parasitism with the tuatara benefitting from burrow use and easy predation opportunities, to the detriment of the lifetime reproductive success of the fairy prion. In other instances it may simply be a case of competition for a limited resource (a burrow) with the outcome varying depending on the individuals and the circumstances involved. Being able to categorize interactions between species of high conservation value or at least to have an understanding of the costs and benefits associated with the interaction is desirable for conservation purposes, as failure to consider the ecological network within which a threatened species is embedded, may lead to counterproductive management measures. Further, these results can be used to develop future research into how climatic changes in temperature and rainfall may interact with habitat availability to influence the full range of natural outcomes of the tuatara-fairy prion association.</p>


2017 ◽  
Vol 17 ◽  
pp. 57-69 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jorge Luis Becerra-López ◽  
Cristina Garcia-De la Peña ◽  
Ulises Romero-Méndez ◽  
Aurelio Ramírez-Bautista
Keyword(s):  

Author(s):  
Yumi Henmi ◽  
Gyo Itani

Abstract Many alpheid shrimps live symbiotically on the body surface or inside the bodies of other invertebrates, while others use burrows made by other animals. The burrow symbiosis of alpheid shrimps is poorly studied in the context of ecology, probably because the cryptic infaunal nature of the relationship is hard to observe. The limited knowledge of the pattern of burrow use by alpheid shrimps leaves a gap in our understanding of their evolutionary history. We described and compared the behavior of Stenalpheops anacanthus  Miya, 1997 and Athanas japonicus  Kubo, 1936, two alpheid species living symbiotically in the burrows of the same host, Upogebia yokoyai  Makarov, 1938. We found that both alpheid species used U. yokoyai burrows in aquaria, but their burrow use patterns were quite different. The average time taken for S. anacanthus to enter the burrow for the first time was much shorter (1 min) than that of A. japonicus (13 min). Subsequently, S. anacanthus made longer use of the burrow (80% of the observation period) than A. japonicus (49%). The tail-first exit frequency, which may indicate a sudden expulsion from the burrow by the host, was more frequent in A. japonicus (25%) than in S. anacanthus (7%). Such differences could be attributed to the nature of the symbiotic relationship, obligate in S. anacanthus but facultative in A. japonicus. Because of the diversity of symbiotic lifestyles, there is considerable potential to study the ecology and evolutionary biology of burrow-symbiotic alpheids further.


Herpetologica ◽  
2009 ◽  
Vol 65 (2) ◽  
pp. 214-218 ◽  
Author(s):  
Valerie M. Johnson ◽  
Craig Guyer ◽  
Sharon M. Hermann ◽  
Jeannine Eubanks ◽  
William K. Michener

2013 ◽  
Vol 182 (5) ◽  
pp. E161-E173 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bret Pasch ◽  
Benjamin M. Bolker ◽  
Steven M. Phelps

1991 ◽  
Vol 69 (5) ◽  
pp. 1321-1325 ◽  
Author(s):  
Björn Söderbäck

Interspecific and intraspecific aggressive interactions in the coexisting crayfish species Astacus astacus and Pacifastacus leniusculus were experimentally studied in the laboratory. Pacifastacus leniusculus strongly dominated aggressive interactions with similar-sized A. astacus in heterospecific pairs of juveniles and adults. Pairs of young-of-the-year were considerably less aggressive than the larger body-size groups, and in this size group neither species was aggressively dominant. The two species showed substantial differences in patterns of aggressive behaviour. A higher frequency of unilateral aggressive acts and much lower frequency and shorter duration of fights in P. leniusculus pairs indicate that this species is more inclined to establish a dominance order than A. astacus. The aggressive dominance of P. leniusculus over A. astacus indicates that P. leniusculus might be able to competitively exclude A. astacus when the species are competing for a limited resource.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document