scholarly journals The Law and Economics of Critical Race Theory

2003 ◽  
Vol 112 (7) ◽  
pp. 1757 ◽  
Author(s):  
Devon W. Carbado ◽  
Mitu Gulati ◽  
Francisco Valdes ◽  
Jerome McCristal Culp ◽  
Angela P. Harris
2020 ◽  
pp. 030913252097344
Author(s):  
Leah S Horowitz

This article examines the power relations that unfold when Indigenous-led struggles invoke settler-colonial law toward protection from industry’s impacts. Building on Critical Race Theory, I posit a ‘triple-helical’ relationship between law, power, and ideology, which coproduce one another, mediated by nudges from individual agents. I argue that the triple-helix of Indigenous rights to protection from industry’s impacts has stagnated, due to industrial capitalism’s pushback through social regularization processes as well as its capture of formal and informal regulators and of discourses and ideologies. I conclude with a research agenda for applying the triple-helix framework to Indigenous-led engagements with industry.


2021 ◽  
Vol 103 (1) ◽  
pp. 64-65
Author(s):  
Robert Kim

A recent spate of state laws attempts to limit how much schools teach about critical race theory. Robert Kim surveys the current legislation, noting that they fail to grapple with actual problems in the teaching of history and often contain loopholes that reduce their impact. He also notes that, although states have power over school curricula, the courts have struck down laws related to school curricula when those laws appear to have a discriminatory purpose.


Author(s):  
Nonhlelo Nhleko

In this paper, I critique the manner in which law rationalises Black subordination and white supremacy through its assumption of racial neutrality and ontological equality.4 I seek to postulate the need for a culture of critique within South African jurisprudence and further challenge hegemonic liberal notions of ‘justice’ and the existing ‘reconciliation’ discourse. The calls for a ‘race conscious’ and general jurisprudence shall be advanced through the epistemological paradigm of Critical Race Theory which offers a politicised account of the law through the acknowledgment of the centrality of race in law and through debunking claims of law’s neutrality and objectivity.5


2021 ◽  
pp. 151
Author(s):  
Jessica Eaglin

Michigan Technology Law Review is proud to partner with our peers to publish this essay by Professor Jessica Eaglin on the intertwining social construction of race, law and technology. This piece highlights how the approach to use technology as precise tools for criminal administration or objective solutions to societal issues often fails to consider how laws and technologies are created in our racialized society. If we do not consider how race and technology are co-productive, we will fail to reach substantive justice and instead reinforce existing racial hierarchies legitimated by laws.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document