Life History Evolution in a "Recruitment Population": Why Are Adult Mortality Rates Constant?

Oikos ◽  
1986 ◽  
Vol 47 (2) ◽  
pp. 129 ◽  
Author(s):  
Eric L. Charnov
2000 ◽  
Vol 355 (1403) ◽  
pp. 1657-1662 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michael R. Rose ◽  
Laurence D. Mueller

The concept of the force of natural selection was developed to explain the evolution of ageing. After ageing, however, comes a period in which mortality rates plateau and some individual organisms could, in theory, live forever. This late–life immortality has no presently agreed upon explanation. Two main theories have been offered. The first is heterogeneity within ageing cohorts, such that only extremely robust individuals survive ageing. This theory can be tested by comparisons of more and less robust cohorts. It can also be tested by fitting survival data to its models. The second theory is that late–life plateaus in mortality reflect the inevitable late–life plateau in the force of natural selection. This theory can be tested by changing the force of natural selection in evolving laboratory populations, particularly the age at which the force plateaus. This area of research has great potential for elucidating the overall structure of life–history evolution, particularly the interrelationship between the three life–history phases of development, ageing and immortality.


2010 ◽  
Vol 59 (5) ◽  
pp. 504-517 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jonathan M. Waters ◽  
Diane L. Rowe ◽  
Christopher P. Burridge ◽  
Graham P. Wallis

2015 ◽  
Vol 8 (7) ◽  
pp. 635-649 ◽  
Author(s):  
Emilie Snell‐Rood ◽  
Rickey Cothran ◽  
Anne Espeset ◽  
Punidan Jeyasingh ◽  
Sarah Hobbie ◽  
...  

2006 ◽  
Vol 84 (1) ◽  
pp. 143-150 ◽  
Author(s):  
Stephen P. Bonser ◽  
Lonnie W. Aarssen

Generalisations of life histories in plants are often framed in terms of allocation to reproduction. For example, relative allocation to reproduction is commonly found to be higher in semelparous than in iteroparous plant species. However, the association between vegetative traits and life history has been largely unexplored. In higher plants, reproductive and vegetative function can be measured in terms of meristem allocation. Under this approach, two vegetative traits (apical dominance (the suppression of axillary meristem development) and branching intensity (the commitment of axillary meristems to branches)) can be measured as well as one reproductive trait (reproductive effort). We used phylogenetically independent contrasts to compare reproductive and vegetative function in annual semelparous and perennial iteroparous species. Twenty congeneric species pairs (each species pair represented by one semelparous and one iteroparous species) across nine families were selected based on availability of herbarium specimens. Semelparous life-history evolution was associated with higher reproductive effort. Conversely, iteroparous life-history evolution was associated with higher apical dominance. Branching intensity was not associated with life history. An evolutionary association between life history and apical dominance but not branching intensity suggests a complex relationship between allocation to vegetative traits and the evolution of plant strategies across environments.


Oikos ◽  
1982 ◽  
Vol 38 (1) ◽  
pp. 118 ◽  
Author(s):  
William J. Etges

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document