Some Consequences of Habitat Heterogeneity for Population Dynamics

Oikos ◽  
1980 ◽  
Vol 35 (2) ◽  
pp. 150 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michael P. Hassell
Keyword(s):  
Population Dynamics ◽  
Habitat Heterogeneity

scholarly journals Resolving the SLOSS dilemma for biodiversity conservation: a research agenda

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lenore Fahrig ◽  
James Watling ◽  
Carlos Arnillas ◽  
Víctor Arroyo-Rodríguez ◽  
Theresa Jörger-Hickfang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Population Dynamics ◽  
Biodiversity Conservation ◽  
Habitat Heterogeneity ◽  
Research Agenda ◽  
Large Scale ◽  
Empirical Support ◽  
Gamma Diversity ◽  
Habitat Patches ◽  
Spreading Of Risk

In biodiversity conservation, the “SL > SS principle” that a single (or few) large habitat patches (SL) conserve more species than several small patches (SS) is used to prioritize protection of large patches while down-weighting small ones. However, empirical support for this principle is lacking; most studies find SS > SL. We propose a research agenda to resolve this dilemma by asking, “are there consistent, empirically-demonstrated conditions leading to SL > SS?” We develop a hypothesis to answer this question, the “SLOSS cube hypothesis,” which predicts SL > SS only when all three of the following are true: between-patch movement is low, population dynamics are not influenced by spreading-of-risk, and large-scale across-habitat heterogeneity is low. We then propose methods to test this prediction. Many tests are needed, comparing gamma diversity across multiple landscapes varying in number and sizes of patches. If the prediction is not generally supported across tests, then either the mechanisms leading to SL > SS are extremely rare in nature, or they are outweighed by countervailing mechanisms leading to SS > SL (e.g. lower competition or higher immigration in SS), or both. In that case, the SL > SS principle should be abandoned.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document