Hexachlorophene for Citrus Rust Mite Control

1966 ◽  
Vol 49 (3) ◽  
pp. 195 ◽  
Author(s):  
Roger B. Johnson
Keyword(s):  
Mite Control ◽  
Citrus Rust Mite

Citrus Rust Mite Control with Alert (Ac 303, 630), 1996

1997 ◽  
Vol 22 (1) ◽  
pp. 65-65
Author(s):  
C. C. Childers ◽  
T. Gainey ◽  
D. K. Threlkeld
Keyword(s):  
Mite Control ◽  
Citrus Rust Mite

scholarly journals Evaluation of AC 303, 630 for Citrus Rust Mite Control on Texas Citrus, 1994

1995 ◽  
Vol 20 (1) ◽  
pp. 53-53
Author(s):  
J. Victor French ◽  
Michael B. Jackson
Keyword(s):  
Mite Control ◽  
Citrus Rust Mite

scholarly journals Effect of Pyrethroid Insecticides on Citrus Rust Mite Control, Fall, 2013: Table 1

2015 ◽  
Vol 40 (1) ◽  
pp. D20
Author(s):  
Philip A. Stansly ◽  
Jawwad A. Qureshi ◽  
Barry C. Kostyk
Keyword(s):  
Pyrethroid Insecticides ◽  
Mite Control ◽  
Citrus Rust Mite

scholarly journals Evaluation of Micromite for Citrus Rust Mite Control, 1997

1998 ◽  
Vol 23 (1) ◽  
pp. 59-60
Author(s):  
J. Victor French ◽  
Santiago Villarreal
Keyword(s):  
Mite Control ◽  
Citrus Rust Mite

scholarly journals Citrus Rust Mite Control with Ac 303,630 on Texas Citrus, 1995

1996 ◽  
Vol 21 (1) ◽  
pp. 69-70
Author(s):  
J. Victor French ◽  
Santiago Villarreal
Keyword(s):  
Mite Control ◽  
Citrus Rust Mite

scholarly journals Citrus Rust Mite Control with Bas 300 111 on Texas Citrus, 1993

1994 ◽  
Vol 19 (1) ◽  
pp. 45-45
Author(s):  
J. Victor French ◽  
Elias Hernandez
Keyword(s):  
High Pressure ◽  
Single Tree ◽  
Mite Control ◽  
Citrus Rust Mite

Abstract Experimental BAS 300 1II, alone and tank mixed with either Lorsban or Supracide, was compared to Vendex for efficacy against CRM. Treatments were randomized and replicated 4 times on single tree plots in a 7-yr-old grapefruit orchard on 15 × 24 ft spacing. Each sprayed tree was separated on all sides by unsprayed buffer trees. Treatment sprays were applied on 10 May to foliar runoff with a Hypro 5200 high pressure handgun sprayer operating at 200 psi. At each count date, 12 fruit per replicate were randomly selected and examined for CRM in situ with a 10X handlens. All live CRM were counted in two, 1-sq cm lens fields on the shaded side of each fruit. The two counts per fruit were averaged and recorded as one observation.

scholarly journals Evaluation of Nexter (Bas 3000 111) for Citrus Rust Mite Control, 1996

1997 ◽  
Vol 22 (1) ◽  
pp. 66-67
Author(s):  
C. C. Childers ◽  
T. Gainey ◽  
D. K. Threlkeld
Keyword(s):  
Mite Control ◽  
Citrus Rust Mite

scholarly journals Citrus Rust Mite Control on Citrus, 1996

1997 ◽  
Vol 22 (1) ◽  
pp. 60-60
Author(s):  
J. Victor French ◽  
Santiago Villarreal
Keyword(s):  
Post Treatment ◽  
Air Blast ◽  
Mite Control ◽  
X 24 ◽  
Citrus Rust Mite

Abstract Different rates of Experimental CM-006, alone and tank-mixed with NR 435 Oil, were. compared with the standard acaricide Agri-Mek + NR 435 oil. Treatments were randomized and replicated 4 times on plots of 6 trees each in a block of 11 -yr-old grapefruit trees planted on 18 X 24 ft. spacing. Treatment sprays were applied 20 May using a FMC 1229 single volute commercial air blast sprayer operating at 1 mph, with nozzling and pressure calibrated to apply 200 gpa. At weekly intervals post treatment, 25 fruit per replicate (100/treatment) were randomly selected and examined for CRM in situ with a 10 X handlens. All live CRM were counted in two, 1 cm2 lens fields on the shaded side of each fruit. The two counts per fruit were averaged and recorded as one observation.

scholarly journals Citrus Rust Mite Control on Texas Citrus, 1994

1995 ◽  
Vol 20 (1) ◽  
pp. 53-53
Author(s):  
J. Victor French ◽  
Michael B. Jackson
Keyword(s):  
Foliar Spray ◽  
Wide Band ◽  
Drip Line ◽  
Flood Irrigation ◽  
Air Blast ◽  
Foliar Fertilizer ◽  
Mite Control ◽  
Citrus Rust Mite ◽  
Canopy Drip

Abstract Foliar spray treatments of Kelthane and Agri-Mek, along or tank-mixed with either NR 440 oil, Blue Lightning surfactant or Trisert foliar fertilizer (26% nitrogen and 0.5% Boron) were compared to a Temik soil treatment. All treatments were randomized and replicated 4 times on plots of 4 trees each in a 9 yr old grapefruit block on 15 × 28 ft spacing. Spray treatments were applied using an FMC 1229 single volute commercial air blast sprayer with speed, nozzling and pressure adjusted to apply 250 gpa. Temik was incorporated into the soil in a 4 ft wide band at the canopy drip line on both sides of the tree row and activated by flood irrigation. All treatments were applied on 11 May with CRM counts made at 7 to 14 day intervals. At each sample date, 12 fruit were randomly selected in each tree (48 fruit per replicated plot) and examined for CRM in situ with a 10X handlens. All live CRM (except eggs) were counted in two, 1-cm2 lens fields on the shaded sides of each fruit. The two counts per fruit were averaged and recorded as one observation.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document