scholarly journals A Reasoning-Process Review Model for Federal Habeas Corpus

2004 ◽  
Vol 94 (4) ◽  
pp. 897
Author(s):  
Steven Semeraro
Keyword(s):  
Habeas Corpus ◽  
Reasoning Process ◽  
Review Model

"O Habeas Corpus"

2001 ◽  
Vol 1 (1) ◽  
pp. 201-208
Author(s):  
E. Seguchi
Keyword(s):  
Habeas Corpus

Proposing a Way to Develop the Substantive Content of the Right of Access to Adequate Housing: An Alternative to the Reasonableness Review Model

2017 ◽  
Vol 30 (1) ◽  
pp. 71-93
Author(s):  
Gustav Muller
Keyword(s):  
International Law ◽  
Municipal Services ◽  
International Convention ◽  
Cultural Rights ◽  
Substantive Content ◽  
Convincing Case ◽  
Close Proximity ◽  
Review Model ◽  
The Right ◽  
Right Of Access

In this article an attempt is made to put forward a convincing case for giving substantive content to the right of access to adequate housing and looks towards relevant international law elaborations on the meaning of this right as contained in the International Convention on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights (ICESCR). It does so while being aware of the Constitutional Court’s prior rejection of an international law-based minimum core interpretation of the right and opting, instead, for the so-called model of reasonableness breview. Given that the court has so expressly taken and stuck to this stance, it is argued in the article that an international law-based substantive interpretation of the right is possible – given that South Africa has recently ratified the ICESCR – and that it is preferable given the shortfalls of the model of reasonableness review. The article further highlights what difference the preferred reading of section 26(1) would make as to how courts ‘interpret’ reasonableness, that is, how courts review compliance with section 26 at present if ‘adequate’ housing is understood as having security of tenure and access to basic municipal services; is affordable, habitable and accessible; is located in close proximity to social facilities; and is culturally adequate.

Habeas Corpus – À Contradição Entre o Proclamado Acesso à Justiça e as Políticas Restritivas do Judiciário

2020 ◽  
Vol 19 (2) ◽  
pp. 49-68
Author(s):  
Rogério Pereira Leal ◽  
José Cristiano Leão Tolini
Keyword(s):  
Habeas Corpus

O uso dos direitos e das garantias fundamentais do habeas corpus, estabelecendo uma linha entre a Constituição Federal de 1988 e a Corte Interamericana de Direitos Humanos. A possibilidade de um Estado Parte suspender a utilização do habeas corpus mesmo em tempo de ameaça a paz social e a política, em detrimento de uma pessoa ameaçada de prisão. Trata-se de estudo comparativo acerca de uma possível proibição da impetração de habeas corpus durante o estado de sítio conforme os artigos 138 e 139 da Carta Magna, ocorrido durante a vigência do AI-5.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document