Evidence: Husband and Wife: Privileged Communications: Loss of Privilege Where Communication Dictated to Third Party

1934 ◽  
Vol 22 (5) ◽  
pp. 573
Author(s):  
C. M.
2018 ◽  
Vol 33 (3) ◽  
pp. 365
Author(s):  
Rilda Murniati

Every marriage will give birth the union of assets that can be obtained by husband and wife during the marriage if not excluded by the marriage agreement. However, the Marriage Law explicitly and clearly stipulates that the marriage agreement must be made before the marriage takes place or at the time the marriage takes place. The existence of these legal provisions, in fact, is not entirely known by every prospective husband and wife and raises new problems related to land law that limits ownership rights to land and buildings for Indonesian citizens who marry other citizens without marriage agreements. This is the reason for the birth of a material test suit against the provisions of the Marriage Law contained in the Decision of the Constitutional Court No. 69 / PUU-XII / 2015. This decision forms the basis and legal basis for new arrangements as a source of legal renewal on the procedures for marriage agreements and their legal consequences for joint assets acquired in marriage. The born of legal renewal is the marriage agreement that can be made any time during the marriage in the form of an authentic deed at the notary and can be retroactive from the date the marriage takes place as long as the husband and wife agree and bind as a law to the parties. For this reason, the legal consequences of the legal status of joint assets acquired during marriage are the personal property of each husband and wife and their contents are binding on third parties as long as the third party has an interest.


2018 ◽  
Vol 26 (1) ◽  
pp. 95
Author(s):  
Priesty Yustika Putri ◽  
Prija Djatmika ◽  
Dhiana Puspitawati

Under the provisions of Article 29 of Law Number 1 Year 1974 on Marriage, a marriage agreement may only be made before or at the time of marriage. However, after the Decision of the Constitutional Court Number 69/PUU-XIII/2015, marriage agreements may also be made during the period of marriage ties. The making of this marriage agreement certainly affects the joint property of husband and wife obtained in the marriage period before the marriage agreement is made. Including if the couple also has a debt together. This then raises problems related to debt settlement. The purpose of this study is to determine the juridical implications of marriage agreements made during the marriage bonds to the joint debt post-Decision of the Constitutional Court. This research is classified as normative juridical research using the concept of law and conceptual. The results of the study show that after the Decision of the Constitutional Court Number 69/PUU-XIII/2015, which stipulates that a marriage agreement may be made during the period of marriage bonds related to the responsibility of the joint debt repayment arising prior to the marriage agreement, the settlement may be contracted as per the second agreement the husband and wife. This is because there are no rules that prohibit the existence of such clauses to be set forth in the marriage agreement. However, if a marriage agreement in which the settlement of the joint debt will result in harm to a third party then the marriage agreement is not allowed, as regulated in Article 29 paragraph (4) Act 1/1974.


Authentica ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 2 (2) ◽  
pp. 95-120
Author(s):  
Meisha Poetri Perdana

The marriage agreement is based on Law Number 1 of 1974 Concerning Marriage, a marriage agreement is a means of protecting the assets of a husband and wife, this agreement the parties can determine their respective inheritance. Is there a separation of assets in the marriage from the beginning or is there a shared asset, but the method of division is divided if a divorce occurs. The inheritance of each husband and wife and property obtained as a gift or inheritance, respectively, is under the control of each other as long as the parties do not specify otherwise. The method used in this research is the normative juridical approach. The data used in this paper are secondary data and primary data as a complement to secondary data. The results of research and discussion, namely the marriage agreement that is not recorded or registered, is invalid according to the provisions of Article 29 paragraph (1) of Law Number 1 of 1974. The legal consequences of marital property if the marriage agreement is not registered is that the property becomes joint property and assets default. Legal protection for a disadvantaged third party is by means of preventive legal protection in which a third party has the right to assume that the marriage agreement does not exist, whereas the refractive legal protection that is the third party has the right to file a lawsuit in court. Suggestions that the notary provides guidance to register the marriage agreement deed to the Population and Civil Registry Office in order to obtain validity and publicity. And the marriage agreement must be registered so as not to harm a third party. Keywords: Registration of Marriage Agreement, Marriage Property, Legal Protection of Third Party


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document