Infertile Matings and Sperm Competition: The Effect of "Nonsperm Representation" on Intraspecific Variation in Sperm Precedence Patterns

2004 ◽  
Vol 164 (4) ◽  
pp. 457
Author(s):  
García-González
Keyword(s):  
Sperm Competition ◽  
Intraspecific Variation ◽  
Sperm Precedence

scholarly journals Sperm Competition in the Absence of Fertilization in Caenorhabditis elegans

Genetics ◽  
1999 ◽  
Vol 152 (1) ◽  
pp. 201-208 ◽  
Author(s):  
Andrew Singson ◽  
Katherine L Hill ◽  
Steven W L’Hernault
Keyword(s):  
Caenorhabditis Elegans ◽  
Sperm Competition ◽  
Sperm Function ◽  
Sperm Precedence ◽  
Wild Type ◽  
Nematode Caenorhabditis Elegans ◽  
C Elegans ◽  
Normal Sperm ◽  
Self Fertilization ◽  
Competition Assays

Abstract Hermaphrodite self-fertilization is the primary mode of reproduction in the nematode Caenorhabditis elegans. However, when a hermaphrodite is crossed with a male, nearly all of the oocytes are fertilized by male-derived sperm. This sperm precedence during reproduction is due to the competitive superiority of male-derived sperm and results in a functional suppression of hermaphrodite self-fertility. In this study, mutant males that inseminate fertilization-defective sperm were used to reveal that sperm competition within a hermaphrodite does not require successful fertilization. However, sperm competition does require normal sperm motility. Additionally, sperm competition is not an absolute process because oocytes not fertilized by male-derived sperm can sometimes be fertilized by hermaphrodite-derived sperm. These results indicate that outcrossed progeny result from a wild-type cross because male-derived sperm are competitively superior and hermaphrodite-derived sperm become unavailable to oocytes. The sperm competition assays described in this study will be useful in further classifying the large number of currently identified mutations that alter sperm function and development in C. elegans.

scholarly journals Evolution of external female genital mutilation: why do males harm their mates?

2017 ◽  
Vol 4 (11) ◽  
pp. 171195 ◽  
Author(s):  
Pierick Mouginot ◽  
Gabriele Uhl ◽  
Lutz Fromhage
Keyword(s):  
Sperm Competition ◽  
Female Genital Mutilation ◽  
Reproductive Traits ◽  
Sperm Precedence ◽  
Male Fitness ◽  
Fitness Costs ◽  
Female Fitness ◽  
Genital Mutilation ◽  
Female Behaviour ◽  
Female Genital

Sperm competition may select for male reproductive traits that influence female mating or oviposition rate. These traits may induce fitness costs to the female; however, they may be costly for the males as well as any decrease in female fitness also affects male fitness. Male adaptations to sperm competition manipulate females by altering not only female behaviour or physiology, but also female morphology. In orb-weaving spiders, mating may entail mutilation of external structures of the female genitalia, which prevents genital coupling with subsequent males. Here, we present a game theoretical model showing that external female genital mutilation is favoured even under relatively high costs of mutilation, and that it is favoured by a high number of mate encounters per female and last-male sperm precedence.

scholarly journals INTRASPECIFIC VARIATION IN SPERM LENGTH IS NEGATIVELY RELATED TO SPERM COMPETITION IN PASSERINE BIRDS

Evolution ◽  
2008 ◽  
Vol 62 (2) ◽  
pp. 494-499 ◽  
Author(s):  
Oddmund Kleven ◽  
Terje Laskemoen ◽  
Frode Fossøy ◽  
Raleigh J. Robertson ◽  
Jan T. Lifjeld
Keyword(s):  
Sperm Competition ◽  
Intraspecific Variation ◽  
Sperm Length ◽  
Passerine Birds

scholarly journals Conspecific sperm precedence is reinforced but sexual selection weakened in sympatric populations ofDrosophila

2016 ◽  
Author(s):  
Dean M. Castillo ◽  
Leonie C. Moyle
Keyword(s):  
Sexual Selection ◽  
Reproductive Isolation ◽  
Sperm Competition ◽  
Competitive Ability ◽  
Genetic Basis ◽  
Direct Selection ◽  
Sperm Precedence ◽  
Sympatric Populations ◽  
Selection For ◽  
The Cost

SUMMARYSexual selection is well recognized as a driver of reproductive isolation between lineages. However, selection for increased reproductive isolation could reciprocally change the outcomes of sexual selection, when these processes share a genetic basis. Direct selection for reproductive isolation occurs in the context of ‘reinforcement’, where selection acts to increase prezygotic barriers to reduce the cost of heterospecific matings. Many studies of reinforcement focus on premating reproductive barriers, however postmating traits-such as conspecific sperm precedence (CSP)-can also respond to reinforcing selection. We tested whether i) CSP responded to reinforcing selection, and ii) this response in sympatric populations altered intraspecific sperm competition (ISC) and the strength of sexual selection, with the sister speciesDrosophila pseudoobscuraandD. persimilis. We used sperm competition experiments to evaluate differences in CSP and ISC between two sympatric and two allopatric populations ofD. pseudoobscura. Using multiple genotypes for each population allowed us to estimate not only patterns of phenotype divergence, but also the opportunity for sexual selection within each population. Consistent with a pattern of reinforcement, the sympatric populations had higher mean CSP. Moreover, ISC was altered in sympatric populations, where we observed decreased average offensive sperm competitive ability against conspecific males, allowing less opportunity for sexual selection to operate within these populations. These data demonstrate that strong reinforcing selection for reproductive isolation can have consequences for sexual selection and sexual interactions within species, in these important postmating sperm competition traits.

scholarly journals Conspecific sperm precedence in Callosobruchus subinnotatus (Coleoptera: Bruchidae): mechanisms and consequences

2007 ◽  
Vol 274 (1612) ◽  
pp. 983-988 ◽  
Author(s):  
Paul F Rugman-Jones ◽  
Paul E Eady
Keyword(s):  
Sexual Selection ◽  
Gene Flow ◽  
Sperm Competition ◽  
Reproductive Tract ◽  
Callosobruchus Maculatus ◽  
Female Reproductive Tract ◽  
Sperm Precedence ◽  
Male And Female ◽  
Mating Order ◽  
Callosobruchus Subinnotatus

Conspecific sperm precedence (CSP) has been identified as an important post-copulatory, pre-zygotic mechanism that can act to reduce gene flow between populations. The evolution of CSP is thought to have arisen as a by-product of male and female coevolution in response to intraspecific post-copulatory sexual selection. However, little is known about the mechanisms that generate CSP. When Callosobruchus subinnotatus females copulate with both C. subinnotatus and Callosobruchus maculatus males, regardless of mating order, the majority of eggs are fertilized by conspecific sperm. The low number of heterospecific fertilizations does not result from general differences in the viability of sperm in the female reproductive tract, as heterospecific sperm fertilized equivalent numbers of eggs as conspecific sperm in the absence of sperm competition. Instead, CSP results from disadvantages to heterospecific sperm that are manifest only when in competition with conspecific sperm. CSP in C. subinnotatus appears to result from two, not mutually exclusive, mechanisms. First, conspecific sperm are better able to displace heterospecific sperm from female storage. Second, conspecific sperm achieve disproportionately higher numbers of fertilizations relative to their proportional representation in the fertilization set. Thus, we provide evidence of differential sperm use from the female spermatheca.

Sperm competition: evolutionary causes and consequences

1995 ◽  
Vol 7 (4) ◽  
pp. 755 ◽  
Author(s):  
TR Birkhead
Keyword(s):  
Sperm Competition ◽  
Zebra Finch ◽  
Female Choice ◽  
Temporal Pattern ◽  
Cryptic Female Choice ◽  
Optimal Time ◽  
Optimal Timing ◽  
Sperm Precedence ◽  
Male And Female ◽  
Ejaculate Size

The interaction between functional and mechanistic approaches to sperm competition and between male and female perspectives are described and illustrated by a study of the zebra finch, Taeniopygia guttata. Sperm competition experiments in the laboratory show that last male sperm precedence occurs (as it does in many other taxa) although the mechanism is unknown (as in most other taxa). Empirically-derived values were used to construct a mathematical model of sperm competition in the zebra finch. The model indicates that precedence occurs as a consequence of: (i) the temporal pattern of pair copulations; (ii) the rate at which sperm are lost from the female tract; and (iii) more sperm being transferred during extra-pair copulations than during pair copulations. The latter effect is a consequence of males seeking extra-pair copulations after their own pair copulation period has ended. The effect of sperm numbers on the pattern of sperm precedence may be further increased by: (i) extra-pair males increasing ejaculate size (sperm numbers) (for which there is no evidence); (ii) extra-pair males being of a better quality and transferring more sperm or better quality sperm (for which there is some evidence); and (iii) cryptic female choice. Females eject over 99% of sperm following insemination; if they eject fewer sperm from males chosen as extra-pair copulation partners, the potential for cryptic female choice is considerable. However, this is still being investigated. The model also predicts the optimal time for an extra-pair copulation to occur (from either a male or female perspective). A comparison between the predicted and observed pattern suggests that the optimal timing of extra-pair copulations is constrained in both sexes.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document