Infrastructure and Health Services in the West Bank: Guidelines for Health Care Planning. The West Bank Rural Primary Health Care Survey

1994 ◽  
Vol 15 (3) ◽  
pp. 368
Author(s):  
Anita Pepper ◽  
Max Pepper ◽  
Mustafa Barghouthi ◽  
Ibrahim Daibes ◽  
'Atef Shbayta ◽  
...  
BMJ Open ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 7 (8) ◽  
pp. e016195 ◽  
Author(s):  
Meng Su ◽  
Qiuli Zhang ◽  
Jiapeng Lu ◽  
Xi Li ◽  
Na Tian ◽  
...  

IntroductionChina has pioneered advances in primary health care (PHC) and public health for a large and diverse population. To date, the current state of PHC in China has not been subjected to systematic assessments. Understanding variations in primary care services could generate opportunities for improving the structure and function of PHC.Methods and analysisThis paper describes a nationwide PHC study (PEACE MPP Primary Health Care Survey) conducted across 31 provinces in China. The study leverages an ongoing research project, the China Patient-centered Evaluative Assessment of Cardiac Events (PEACE) Million Persons Project (MPP). It employs an observational design with document acquisition and abstraction and in-person interviews. The study will collect data and original documents on the structure and financing of PHC institutions and the adequacy of the essential medicines programme; the education, training and retention of the PHC workforce; the quality of care; and patient satisfaction with care. The study will provide a comprehensive assessment of current PHC services and help determine gaps in access and quality of care. All study instruments and documents will be deposited in the Document Bank as an open-access source for other researchers.Ethics and disseminationThe central ethics committee at the China National Centre for Cardiovascular Disease (NCCD) approved the study. Written informed consent has been obtained from all patients. Findings will be disseminated in future peer reviewed papers, and will inform strategies aimed at improving the PHC in China.Trial registration numberNCT02953926


2020 ◽  
Vol 73 (6) ◽  
Author(s):  
Tainá Nicola ◽  
Alísia Helena Weis

ABSTRACT Objective: to describe the stages of construction and content validation of an instrument to assess Primary Health Care Planning workshops. Methods: this methodological study focused on validating the instrument’s content. The instrument developed was assessed by a committee of experts using the Delphi Technique, in two rounds. For the degree of agreement, percentage agreement and Content Validity Index (CVI) were used. Results: in the first round, six experts participated, and the degree of agreement was 87% for clarity and 94% for representativeness. In the second round, five experts participated, the CVI was 0.95 for clarity, 0.97 for representativeness and 0.96 total CVI. The final instrument had 42 items divided into three chunks. Conclusion: the instrument has content validity to assess Primary Health Care Planning workshops, being a tool for the use of state and municipal administrations.


2018 ◽  
Vol 19 (6) ◽  
pp. 622-628 ◽  
Author(s):  
Julia Lukewich ◽  
Dana S. Edge ◽  
Elizabeth VanDenKerkhof ◽  
Tyler Williamson ◽  
Joan Tranmer

AbstractBackgroundVarious organizational-level attributes are being implemented in primary healthcare to improve healthcare delivery. There is a need to describe the distribution and nature of these attributes and explore differences across practices.AimThe aim of this study was to better understand organizational attributes of primary care teams, focusing specifically on team composition, nursing roles, and strategies that support chronic disease management.MethodsWe employed a cross-sectional survey design. Team composition, nursing roles, availability of health services, and chronic disease management activities were described using the ‘Measuring Organizational Attributes of Primary Health Care Survey.’FindingsA total of 76% (n=26 out of 34) of practice locations completed the survey, including family health teams (FHT; n=21) and community health centers (CHC; n=4). Nurse practitioners (NPs) and registered nurses (RNs) were the most common non-physician providers, and CHCs had a greater proportion of non-physician providers than FHTs. There was overlap in roles performed by NPs and RNs, and registered practical nurses engaged in fewer roles compared with NPs and RNs. A greater proportion of FHTs had systematic chronic disease management services for hypertension, depression and Alzheimer’s disease compared with CHC practices. The ‘Measuring Organizational Attributes of Primary Health Care Survey’ was a useful tool to highlight variability in organizational attributes across PHC practices. Nurses are prominent within PHC practices, engaging in a wide range of roles related to chronic disease management, suggesting a need to better understand their contributions to patient care to optimize their roles.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document