Genetic Variation and Host-Parasite Relations: Nematospiroides dubius in Mice

1991 ◽  
Vol 77 (6) ◽  
pp. 884 ◽  
Author(s):  
Colin Dobson ◽  
Tang Jian-Ming
Keyword(s):  
Genetic Variation ◽  
Nematospiroides Dubius ◽  
Host Parasite

Certain aspects of the host-parasite relationship ofNematospiroides dubius(Baylis). II. The effect of sex on experimental infections in the rat (an abnormal host)

Parasitology ◽  
1961 ◽  
Vol 51 (3-4) ◽  
pp. 499-510 ◽  
Author(s):  
Colin Dobson
Keyword(s):  
Male Rats ◽  
Male Rat ◽  
Normal Male ◽  
Female Rat ◽  
Castrate Male ◽  
Parasite Relationship ◽  
Nematospiroides Dubius ◽  
Resistance To Infection ◽  
Host Parasite ◽  
The Relationship

1. The male rat is more susceptible to infections ofNematospiroides dubiusthan the female. As the rat grows older the resistance of the female rat to infection increases at a greater rate than that of the male.2. The course of the infection is modified by the sex of the host.3. More larvae penetrated the intestinal mucosa to encyst in the male than in the female. More larvae, however, formed cysts in the female than in the male rat by the fifth day.4. The male harboured more adult worms than the female rat, although this difference was not significant in the immature animals.5. The sex resistance of the rat toN. dubiusinfections was removed by bilateral gonadectomy. Castration decreased the susceptibility of the male rat, while spaying increased it in the female compared with the susceptibility in the respective normal hosts.6. Subsequent replacement of the homologous sex hormone in the gonadectomized rat restores the sex resistance, and may even increase it (particularly in the immature animals). Oestradiol increased the resistance of the spayed female rat, while testosterone increased the susceptibility of the castrate male rat to infection.7. Oestradiol implanted in castrate male rats increased the resistance of these hosts to a greater level than was shown in the normal male rat.8. The rat shows a marked age resistance over which the sex resistance is superimposed.9. The relationship between the sex of the host and its resistance to infection is discussed.This work was done during the tenure of a Department of Scientific and Industrial Research Studentship. My thanks are due to Dr E. T. B. Francis for his helpful and critical supervision and to Professor I. Chester Jones, in whose department the work was done, for the facilities he provided.

scholarly journals Genetic variation in dispersal plasticity in an aquatic host-parasite model system

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Giacomo Zilio ◽  
Louise Solveig Noergaard ◽  
Giovanni Petrucci ◽  
Nathalie Zeballos ◽  
Claire Gougat-Barbera ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Genetic Variation ◽  
Internal State ◽  
Theoretical Models ◽  
Infection Prevalence ◽  
Main Role ◽  
Dependent Plasticity ◽  
Evolutionary Forces ◽  
State Dependent ◽  
Context Dependent ◽  
Host Parasite

Dispersal plays a main role in determining spatial dynamics, and both theory and empirical evidence indicate that evolutionary optima exist for constitutive or plastic dispersal behaviour. Plasticity in dispersal can be influenced by factors both internal (state-dependent) or external (context-dependent) to individuals. Parasitism is interesting in this context, as it can influence both types of host dispersal plasticity: individuals can disperse in response to internal infection status but might also respond to the presence of infected individuals around them. We still know little about the driving evolutionary forces of host dispersal plasticity, but a first requirement is the presence of a genetic basis on which natural selection can act. In this study, we used microcosm dispersal mazes to investigate plastic dispersal of 20 strains of the freshwater protist Paramecium caudatum in response to the bacterial parasite Holospora undulata. We additionally quantified the genetic component of the plastic responses, i.e. the heritability of state- and context-depended dispersal. We found that infection by the parasite can either increase or decrease dispersal of individual strains relative to the uninfected (state-dependent plasticity), and this to be heritable. We also found strain-specific change of dispersal of uninfected Paramecium when exposed to variable infection prevalence (context-dependent plasticity) with very low level of heritability. To our knowledge, this is the first explicit empirical demonstration and quantification of genetic variation of plastic dispersal in a host-parasite system, which could have important implications for meta-population and epidemiological dynamics. We discuss some of the underlying mechanisms of this variation and link our results to the existing theoretical models.

Certain aspects of the host-parasite relationship of Nematospiroides dubius (Baylis). I. Resistance of male and female mice to experimental infections

Parasitology ◽  
1961 ◽  
Vol 51 (1-2) ◽  
pp. 173-179 ◽  
Author(s):  
Colin Dobson
Keyword(s):  
Relative Length ◽  
Industrial Research ◽  
Male Mice ◽  
Male And Female ◽  
Female Mice ◽  
Host Parasite Relationship ◽  
Parasite Relationship ◽  
Nematospiroides Dubius ◽  
Host Parasite ◽  
Relationship Of

1. It has been shown that there is a difference between the resistance of male and female mice to infection with Nematospiroides dubius.2. More parasites were harboured, during both the larval and adult parasitic phases, by male mice.3. These worms were found to occupy a similar relative length of the intestine between the stomach and the caecum in male and female mice infected for either 5 or 10 days.4. The relative length of the intestine infected on the fifth day was significantly greater than that infected on the tenth day.This investigation was carried out during the tenure of a Research Studentship from the Department of Scientific and Industrial Research. I should like to thank Professor I. Chester Jones, in whose department the work was done, for the facilities provided and Dr E. T. B. Francis for his helpful and critical supervision.

Certain aspects of the host-parasite relationship of Nematospiroides dubius (Baylis): V. Host specificity

Parasitology ◽  
1962 ◽  
Vol 52 (1-2) ◽  
pp. 41-48 ◽  
Author(s):  
Colin Dobson
Keyword(s):  
Host Specificity ◽  
Host Species ◽  
Adult Parasite ◽  
Male Rat ◽  
Host Parasite Relationship ◽  
Parasite Relationship ◽  
Nematospiroides Dubius ◽  
Host Parasite ◽  
Relationship Of

1. The mouse is more susceptible to infection than the rat.2. The male in both the rat and the mouse is more susceptible to infection than the female.3. The development of the worm is slower in the male rat than in the female. This relationship does not occur in the mouse.4. The ecological position of the adult parasite was different in the mouse and rat, the worms living further down the intestine in the rat.5. The effects of host species on infection of N. dubius are discussed.

Variation in the host-parasite relationship of a crop disease

1968 ◽  
Vol 71 (1) ◽  
pp. 19-36 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. H. Arnold ◽  
S. J. Brown
Keyword(s):  
Genetic Variation ◽  
Environmental Conditions ◽  
Phage Type ◽  
Resistance Breeding ◽  
Wide Range ◽  
Host Parasite Relationship ◽  
Parasite Relationship ◽  
Main Components ◽  
Host Parasite ◽  
Relationship Of

SummaryVariations in the host–parasite relationship of bacterial blight of cotton, caused by Xanthomonas malvacearum, E. F. Smith (Dowson), axe elucidated in terms of the three main components of variation, namely, genetic variation in the host, genetic variation in the parasite and variations in environment.Although the relative resistance shown by host varieties differed both with the culture of the pathogen used for inoculation and with the environmental conditions, over-riding patterns of host resistance could be detected, showing that certain varieties maintained their resistance over a wide range of conditions.It was found that phage type in X. malvacearum was not related to virulence. Moreover, none of the cultures of the pathogen which had been isolated from different sources, could be shown to be identical when inoculated into a range of host varieties under a range of environmental conditions. It was concluded that the pathogen showed continuous variation in virulence and that it would be difficult and of little value to attempt to define races.Some success was achieved in relating observed variations in the host–parasite relationship to easily measured components of the environment, by using multiple regression analyses. It is suggested that this might provide a means of characterizing the complex variations observed and that the host–parasite relationship could be regarded as a dynamic system, in which disease expression is a function of the interactions of environmental factors and two polygenic systems, that of the host and that of the parasite.Intrapopulation variances were also studied in the host varieties. A population which showed little variation for resistance under one set of conditions might show considerable variation in a different environment or when inoculated with a different culture. It is suggested that selection for resistance under conditions which favour the expression of variation can lead, by repeated selection and inbreeding, to the production of resistant populations which retain their resistance under conditions in which the parental stocks showed no worthwhile resistance. These conclusions are discussed in relation to problems in resistance breeding and genetics.

Host life-history variation in response to parasitism

Parasitology ◽  
1985 ◽  
Vol 90 (1) ◽  
pp. 205-216 ◽  
Author(s):  
D. J. Minchella
Keyword(s):  
Genetic Variation ◽  
Life History ◽  
Parasitic Infection ◽  
Host Susceptibility ◽  
Life History Variation ◽  
Susceptible Host ◽  
Finite Set ◽  
Host Life ◽  
Host Parasite ◽  
Parasite Populations

Over half of all living species of plants and animals are parasitic, which by definition involves intimate association with and unfavourable impact on hosts (Price, 1980). This paper will only consider parasites whose ‘unfavourable impact’ adversely affects the birth and/or mortality rates of their hosts (Anderson, 1978). Most organisms are potential hosts and must deal with the problem of parasitism. The probability of parasitic infection of a host is influenced by both environmental and genetic factors. Traditionally it was assumed that a host was either resistant or susceptible to a particular parasite and therefore the interaction between a parasite and potential host had only two possible outcomes: either the resistant host rebuffed the parasitic attack and remained uninfected or the parasite successfully invaded and significantly reduced the reproductive success of the susceptible host. This approach, however, ignored the intraspecific genetic variation present within both host and parasite populations (Wakelin, 1978). Since the outcome is determined by the interaction of a finite set of host genes and parasite genes, genetic variation in host susceptibility and parasite infectivity (Richards, 1976; Wakelin, 1978) suggests that more than two outcomes are possible. Variation in host and parasite genomes does not begin and end at the susceptibility/infectivity loci. Other genes may also influence the outcome of host–parasite interactions by altering the life-history patterns of hosts and parasites, and lead to a variety of outcomes.

scholarly journals Symbiont-conferred immunity interacts with the effects of parasitoid genotype and intraguild predation to shape pea aphid immunity in a clone-specific fashion

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Samuel Alexander Purkiss ◽  
Mouhammad Shadi Khudr ◽  
Oscar Enrique Aguinaga ◽  
Reinmar Hager
Keyword(s):  
Genetic Variation ◽  
Intraguild Predation ◽  
Species Interactions ◽  
Acyrthosiphon Pisum ◽  
Species Interaction ◽  
Genetic Effects ◽  
Pea Aphid ◽  
Aphidius Ervi ◽  
Indirect Genetic Effects ◽  
Host Parasite

Host-parasite interactions represent complex co-evolving systems in which genetic variation within a species can significantly affect selective pressure on traits in the other (for example via inter-species indirect genetic effects). While often viewed as a two-species interaction between host and parasite species, some systems are more complex due to the involvement of symbionts in the host that influence its immunity, enemies of the host, and the parasite through intraguild predation. However, it remains unclear what the joint effects of intraguild predation, defensive endosymbiosis, within-species genetic variation and indirect genetic effects on host immunity are. We have addressed this question in an important agricultural pest system, the pea aphid Acyrthosiphon pisum, which shows significant intraspecific variability in immunity to the parasitoid wasp Aphidius ervi due to immunity conferring endosymbiotic bacteria. In a complex experiment involving a quantitative genetic design of the parasitoid, two ecologically different aphid lineages and the aphid lion Chrysoperla carnea as an intraguild predator, we demonstrate that aphid immunity is affected by intraspecific genetic variation in the parasitoid and the aphid, as well as by associated differences in the defensive endosymbiont communities. Using 16s rRNA sequencing, we identified secondary symbionts that differed between the lineages. We further show that aphid lineages differ in their altruistic behaviour once parasitised whereby infested aphids move away from the clonal colony to facilitate predation. The outcome of these complex between-species interactions not only shape important host-parasite systems but have also implications for understanding the evolution of multitrophic interactions, and aphid biocontrol.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document