The Wall-Paintings of India, Central Asia and Ceylon. A Comparative Study

Artibus Asiae ◽  
1940 ◽  
Vol 8 (1) ◽  
pp. 75
Author(s):  
Ernst Diez ◽  
Benjamin Rowland
2021 ◽  
Vol 2 (2) ◽  
pp. 13-19
Author(s):  
Shoazim Ibragimovich Shazamanov ◽  
◽  
Anri Abdullaevich Sharapov

The article focuses on the following aspects of the issue: the pragmatic policy of the Republic of Uzbekistan in world politics and the analysis of their features; Documents defining the relations between Uzbekistan and China; study the aspects ofcooperation for peaceful coexistence and development; analysis of the ideas of Uzbek and Chinese researchers on the relations between the two countries; General aspects of reforms in Uzbekistan and China; Capital investments of Chinese entrepreneurs in the development of the Uzbek economy in the regions of the country; cooperation in the field of military, tourism, as well as the policy of the PRC on railway transit with Central Asia to Europe


2021 ◽  
pp. 135-151
Author(s):  
A. F. Koryakina

The article is devoted to the identification of typological similarities and differences in epic plots and motives in the texts of the Yakut olonkho and the Buryat uliger. The relevance of the stated problem is due to the purpose of obtaining additional materials to confirm the results of earlier studies on establishing the genetic origins and typological connections of the epic creativity of the Yakut and Buryat peoples. A brief review of the study of the problem in the works of domestic folklorists, who developed the theory of the comparative study of the peoples of the world epics; Yakut epic scholars, who considered in their works the historical and typological connections of the Yakut olonkho with the epics of the Sayan-Altai, Mongol-Buryat peoples; Buryat scientists who turn in their research to the processes of historical and cultural mutual influences of the epic heritage of the Yakuts and Mongol-Buryats. Scientific methods of typological, structural-comparative and textological analysis are used. The similarity of the plots and plot motives of the olonkho “Nyurgun Bootur the Swift” by K. Orosin and the uliger “Abai Geser Mighty” by M. Imegenov, which is due to the principles of typological repetition in folklore and cultural and historical contacts of the Yakut and Buryat peoples at different stages of development of the Proto-Turkic peoples inhabiting the territory of Central Asia and South Siberia.


1962 ◽  
Vol 27 (3) ◽  
pp. 315-322 ◽  
Author(s):  
V. E. Larichev

AbstractComparative study of both pottery and stone implements indicates that Mongolia, Manchuria, and eastern Siberia constitute a Siberian-Mongolian culture area of great antiquity. During the Neolithic this area was characterized by a small-tool tradition distinct from the microlithic tradition of the west, and unlike the tool-making developments of the Yang-shao and Lung-shan farmers to the south. The so-called “microlithic” character of the Siberian Neolithic is not demonstrated by archaeological collections from the area, and is demonstrated to be the historic result of early terminological confusions that have been perpetuated in the literature. A. A. Formozov's claims for a Eurasian steppe culture characterized by a microlithic tradition distinct from both the southern farmers and the forest culture of the taiga are rejected.


2020 ◽  
Vol 16 (5) ◽  
pp. 13 ◽  
Author(s):  
Huiwei Mao

The Mongols created exceptionally sumptuous cloths of gold to symbolize their imperial authority and legitimacy, what was known at that time as Nasij or Jin Duan zi. They were developed from different culture and textile system. Nasij was an innovation from Central Asia, the technique attests to the mass movement of weavers from the eastern Iranian world to China during the Mongol period. As for Jin Duan zi, it’s a traditional Chinese textile. Under the special background of Yuan Dynasty, the design of both Nasij and Jin Duan zi have combined eastern and western elements.


2019 ◽  
Vol 47 (1) ◽  
pp. 64-72
Author(s):  
O. A. Ulchitsky ◽  
E. K. Bulatova ◽  
E. K. Kazaneva ◽  
O. M. Veremey

The earliest (Bronze Age) fortifi ed settlements in the Southern Urals are described with regard to their defensive function, as well as to manufacture and living quarters. Their parallels are discussed. We focus on the architecture of the earliest Indo-European forts and compare it to that of the later Eurasian counterparts. We reveal the relations between the layout of the Sintashta-Petrovka forts and the architecture of Central Asia and of the early Central Eastern states. Bronze Age settlements of Southern Urals, Northern Kazakhstan, and Central Asia are compared on a unifi ed scale with reference to their function. The results can be used in future research on ancient architecture.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document