Fighting for the Sixties: Political Movements and Cultural ChangeA Tale of Two Utopias. The Political Journey of the Generation of 1968. By Paul Berman The Spirit of the Sixties. The Making of Postwar Radicalism. By James J. Farrell The Conquest of Cool. Business Culture, Counterculture and the Rise of Hip Consumerism. By Thomas Frank The Twilight of Common Dreams. Why America Is Wracked by Culture Wars. By Todd Gitlin The Sixties. Cultural Revolution in Britain, France, Italy, and the United States, c. 1958-c.1974. By Arthur Marwick The Politics of Authenticity. Liberalism, Christianity, and the New Left in America. By Doug Rossinow Anti-Disciplinary Protest. Sixties Radicalism and Postmodernism. By Julie Stephens

Polity ◽  
1999 ◽  
Vol 32 (2) ◽  
pp. 285-299
Author(s):  
William F. Fine ◽  
Nancy S. Love
2016 ◽  
Vol 14 (3) ◽  
pp. 807-808
Author(s):  
Philip Green

The Port Huron Statement was one of the most important manifestos of the New Left in the United States. A foundational statement of the theme of “participatory democracy,” the text had an important influence on post-1960s politics and, arguably, on post-1960s political science. The recent publication of a new edition of the Statement is an occasion for reflection on its importance. And so we have invited a distinguished cast of political scientists shaped by the events of the sixties to comment on the impact of the Statement on their own way of envisioning and practicing political science.


2016 ◽  
Vol 14 (3) ◽  
pp. 801-802
Author(s):  
Mark Blitz

The Port Huron Statement was one of the most important manifestos of the New Left in the United States. A foundational statement of the theme of “participatory democracy,” the text had an important influence on post-1960s politics and, arguably, on post-1960s political science. The recent publication of a new edition of the Statement is an occasion for reflection on its importance. And so we have invited a distinguished cast of political scientists shaped by the events of the sixties to comment on the impact of the Statement on their own way of envisioning and practicing political science.


2016 ◽  
Vol 14 (3) ◽  
pp. 810-811
Author(s):  
Wilbur C. Rich

The Port Huron Statement was one of the most important manifestos of the New Left in the United States. A foundational statement of the theme of “participatory democracy,” the text had an important influence on post-1960s politics and, arguably, on post-1960s political science. The recent publication of a new edition of the Statement is an occasion for reflection on its importance. And so we have invited a distinguished cast of political scientists shaped by the events of the sixties to comment on the impact of the Statement on their own way of envisioning and practicing political science.


2016 ◽  
Vol 14 (3) ◽  
pp. 799-800
Author(s):  
Martha Ackelsberg ◽  
Mary L. Shanley

The Port Huron Statement was one of the most important manifestos of the New Left in the United States. A foundational statement of the theme of “participatory democracy,” the text had an important influence on post-1960s politics and, arguably, on post-1960s political science. The recent publication of a new edition of the Statement is an occasion for reflection on its importance. And so we have invited a distinguished cast of political scientists shaped by the events of the sixties to comment on the impact of the Statement on their own way of envisioning and practicing political science.


2006 ◽  
Vol 23 (3) ◽  
pp. 205-228 ◽  
Author(s):  
Holly Thorpe

Following criticism leveled at sociologists by Chris Rojek and Bryan Turner in “Decorative Sociology: A Critique of the Cultural Turn,” this article identifies a troubling absence of systematic contextualization in sport sociology. In addressing this issue, I begin by describing the role of history and context in sociology and conclude that the discipline should take history more seriously, not least by giving context greater due. I then engage the debate as to whether radical contextual cultural studies or social history offers the best explanation of context. Here I argue for the latter. In justifying my position, I adapt a model employed by the conservative social historian Arthur Marwick in “The sixties: Cultural Revolution in Britain, France, Italy, and the United States, c. 1958–c. 1974,” to contextualize a contemporary cultural phenomenon, the female boarder (i.e., the female surfboard rider, skateboarder, and snowboarder). Ultimately, this paper illustrates that the systematic and transhistorical tools developed by social historians have the potential to facilitate a more all-encompassing contextualization of cultural phenomena, to examine multiple historical conjunctures, and to help sociologists take time and change more seriously.


2020 ◽  
Vol 10 (19) ◽  
pp. 51-67
Author(s):  
Slavojka Beštić-Bronza

The aim of this paper is to show to what extent and by what mechanisms the United States influenced the political formation of the personality and activities of West German Chancellor Willy Brandt. Special emphasis was placed on American influences during the implementation of Brandt's most famous political concept, 'Eastern Politics', which provides the chronological context of the development of relations in line with pan-European and world political movements and their correlation with Brandt's political path in exile and later in occupied Germany, and, finally, in the newly created independent Federal Republic of Germany. Circumstances, personal (dis)inclinations, and mutual influences gave birth to a rather ambivalent relationship, created mainly due to the interests of both parties, which overlapped in certain periods of time, while later they moved away and became cold, even often hostile.


2016 ◽  
Vol 14 (3) ◽  
pp. 809-809
Author(s):  
Frances Fox Piven

The Port Huron Statement was one of the most important manifestos of the New Left in the United States. A foundational statement of the theme of “participatory democracy,” the text had an important influence on post-1960s politics and, arguably, on post-1960s political science. The recent publication of a new edition of the Statement is an occasion for reflection on its importance. And so we have invited a distinguished cast of political scientists shaped by the events of the sixties to comment on the impact of the Statement on their own way of envisioning and practicing political science.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document