On unbounded hazard rates for smoothed perturbation analysis

1995 ◽  
Vol 32 (3) ◽  
pp. 659-667 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michael C. Fu ◽  
Jian-Qiang Hu

Many applications of smoothed perturbation analysis lead to estimators with hazard rate functions of underlying distributions. A key assumption used in proving unbiasedness of the resulting estimator is that the hazard rate function be bounded, a restrictive assumption which excludes all distributions with finite support. Here, we prove through a simple example that this assumption can in fact be removed.

1995 ◽  
Vol 32 (03) ◽  
pp. 659-667 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michael C. Fu ◽  
Jian-Qiang Hu

Many applications of smoothed perturbation analysis lead to estimators with hazard rate functions of underlying distributions. A key assumption used in proving unbiasedness of the resulting estimator is that the hazard rate function be bounded, a restrictive assumption which excludes all distributions with finite support. Here, we prove through a simple example that this assumption can in fact be removed.


1998 ◽  
Vol 12 (1) ◽  
pp. 69-90 ◽  
Author(s):  
Henry W. Block ◽  
Thomas H. Savits ◽  
Harshinder Singh

In this paper we discuss some properties of the reversed hazard rate function. This function has been shown to be useful in the analysis of data in the presence of left censored observations. It is also natural in discussing lifetimes with reversed time scale. In fact, ordinary hazard rate functions are most useful for lifetimes, and reverse hazard rates are natural if the time scale is reversed. Mixing up these concepts can often, although not always, lead to anomalies. For example, one result gives that if the reversed hazard rate function is increasing, its interval of support must be (—∞, b) where b is finite. Consequently nonnegative random variables cannot have increasing reversed hazard rates. Because of this result some existing results in the literature on the reversed hazard rate ordering require modification.Reversed hazard rates are also important in the study of systems. Hazard rates have an affinity to series systems; reversed hazard rates seem more appropriate for studying parallel systems. Several results are given that demonstrate this. In studying systems, one problem is to relate derivatives of hazard rate functions and reversed hazard rate functions of systems to similar quantities for components. We give some results that address this. Finally, we carry out comparisons for k-out-of-n systems with respect to the reversed hazard rate ordering.


Author(s):  
Lucianne Varn ◽  
Stefanka Chukova ◽  
Richard Arnold

Reliability literature on modeling failures of repairable systems mostly deals with systems having monotonically increasing hazard/failure rates. When the hazard rate of a system is non-monotonic, models developed for monotonically increasing failure rates cannot be effectively applied without making assumptions on the types of repair performed following system failures. For instance, for systems having bathtub-shaped hazard rates, it is assumed that during the initial, decreasing hazard rate phase, all repairs are minimal. These assumptions on the type of general repair can be restrictive. In order to relax these assumptions, it has been suggested that general repairs in the initially decreasing phase can be modeled as “aging” the system. This approach however does not preserve the order of effectiveness of the types of general repair as defined in the literature. In this article, we develop a set of models to address these shortcomings. We propose a new stochastic process to model consecutive failures of repairable systems having non-monotonic, specifically bathtub-shaped, hazard rates, where the types of general repair are not restricted and the order of the effectiveness of the types of repair is preserved. The proposed models guarantee that a repaired system is at least as reliable as one that has not failed (or equivalently one that has been minimally repaired). To illustrate the models, we present multiple examples and simulate the failure-repair process and estimate the quantities of interest.


Author(s):  
Nermin Fahmy

This research deals primarily with the hazard rate function of a class of distributions, and discusses the relation between the hazard rate function, and the density function. It was found that the Makeham-Gompertz mortality distribution and the truncated extreme value distribution had the same hazard rate function. We used the hazard rate function derived from these distributions to find the actuarial functions.


1994 ◽  
Vol 31 (1) ◽  
pp. 180-192 ◽  
Author(s):  
Philip J. Boland ◽  
Emad El-Neweihi ◽  
Frank Proschan

The hazard rate ordering is an ordering for random variables which compares lifetimes with respect to their hazard rate functions. It is stronger than the usual stochastic order for random variables, yet is weaker than the likelihood ratio ordering. The hazard rate ordering is particularly useful in reliability theory and survival analysis, owing to the importance of the hazard rate function in these areas. In this paper earlier work on the hazard rate ordering is reviewed, and extensive new results related to coherent systems are derived. Initially we fix the form of a coherent structure and investigate the effect on the hazard rate function of the system when we switch the lifetimes of its components from the vector (T1, · ··, Tn) to the vector (T′1, · ··, T′n), where the hazard rate functions of the two vectors are assumed to be comparable in some sense. Although the hazard rate ordering is closed under the formation of series systems, we see that this is not the case for parallel systems even when the system is a two-component parallel system with exponentially distributed lifetimes. A positive result shows that for two-component parallel systems with proportional hazards (λ1r(t), λ2r(t))), the more diverse (λ1, λ2) is in the sense of majorization the stronger is the system in the hazard rate ordering. Unfortunately even this result does not extend to parallel systems with more than two components, demonstrating again the delicate nature of the hazard rate ordering.The principal result of the paper concerns the hazard rate ordering for the lifetime of a k-out-of-n system. It is shown that if τ k|n is the lifetime of a k-out-of-n system, then τ k|n is greater than τ k+1|n in the hazard rate ordering for any k. This has an interesting interpretation in the language of order statistics. For independent (not necessarily identically distributed) lifetimes T1, · ··, Tn, we let Tk:n represent the kth order statistic (in increasing order). Then it is shown that Tk +1:n is greater than Tk:n in the hazard rate ordering for all k = 1, ···, n − 1. The result does not, however, extend to the stronger likelihood ratio order.


1994 ◽  
Vol 31 (01) ◽  
pp. 180-192 ◽  
Author(s):  
Philip J. Boland ◽  
Emad El-Neweihi ◽  
Frank Proschan

The hazard rate ordering is an ordering for random variables which compares lifetimes with respect to their hazard rate functions. It is stronger than the usual stochastic order for random variables, yet is weaker than the likelihood ratio ordering. The hazard rate ordering is particularly useful in reliability theory and survival analysis, owing to the importance of the hazard rate function in these areas. In this paper earlier work on the hazard rate ordering is reviewed, and extensive new results related to coherent systems are derived. Initially we fix the form of a coherent structure and investigate the effect on the hazard rate function of the system when we switch the lifetimes of its components from the vector (T 1, · ··, Tn ) to the vector (T′ 1, · ··, T′n ), where the hazard rate functions of the two vectors are assumed to be comparable in some sense. Although the hazard rate ordering is closed under the formation of series systems, we see that this is not the case for parallel systems even when the system is a two-component parallel system with exponentially distributed lifetimes. A positive result shows that for two-component parallel systems with proportional hazards (λ 1 r(t), λ 2 r(t))), the more diverse (λ 1, λ2 ) is in the sense of majorization the stronger is the system in the hazard rate ordering. Unfortunately even this result does not extend to parallel systems with more than two components, demonstrating again the delicate nature of the hazard rate ordering. The principal result of the paper concerns the hazard rate ordering for the lifetime of a k-out-of-n system. It is shown that if τ k|n is the lifetime of a k-out-of-n system, then τ k|n is greater than τ k+ 1|n in the hazard rate ordering for any k. This has an interesting interpretation in the language of order statistics. For independent (not necessarily identically distributed) lifetimes T 1, · ··, Tn , we let Tk:n represent the kth order statistic (in increasing order). Then it is shown that Tk + 1:n is greater than Tk:n in the hazard rate ordering for all k = 1, ···, n − 1. The result does not, however, extend to the stronger likelihood ratio order.


The first chapter introduces basic concepts of Reliability and their relationships. Four probability functions—reliability function, cumulative distribution function, probability density function, and hazard rate function—that completely characterize the failure process are defined. Three failure rates—MTBF, MTTF, MTTR—that play important role in reliability engineering design process are explained here. The three patterns of failures, DFR, CFR, and IFR, are discussed with reference to the bathtub curve. Two probability models, Exponential and Weibull, are presented. Series and parallel systems and application areas of reliability are also presented.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document