The exponential rate of convergence of the distribution of the maximum of a random walk

1975 ◽  
Vol 12 (2) ◽  
pp. 279-288 ◽  
Author(s):  
N. Veraverbeke ◽  
J. L. Teugels

Let Gn(x) be the distribution function of the maximum of the successive partial sums of independent and identically distributed random variables and G(x) its limiting distribution function. Under conditions, typical for complete exponential convergence, the decay of Gn(x) — G(x) is asymptotically equal to c.H(x)n−3/2γn as n → ∞ where c and γ are known constants and H(x) is a function solely depending on x.

1975 ◽  
Vol 12 (02) ◽  
pp. 279-288 ◽  
Author(s):  
N. Veraverbeke ◽  
J. L. Teugels

Let Gn (x) be the distribution function of the maximum of the successive partial sums of independent and identically distributed random variables and G(x) its limiting distribution function. Under conditions, typical for complete exponential convergence, the decay of Gn (x) — G(x) is asymptotically equal to c.H(x)n −3/2 γn as n → ∞ where c and γ are known constants and H(x) is a function solely depending on x.


1976 ◽  
Vol 13 (04) ◽  
pp. 733-740
Author(s):  
N. Veraverbeke ◽  
J. L. Teugels

Let Gn (x) be the distribution of the nth successive maximum of a random walk on the real line. Under conditions typical for complete exponential convergence, the decay of Gn (x) – limn→∞ Gn (x) is asymptotically equal to H(x) γn n–3/2 as n → ∞where γ < 1 and H(x) a function solely depending on x. For the case of drift to + ∞, G ∞(x) = 0 and the result is new; for drift to – ∞we give a new proof, simplifying and correcting an earlier version in [9].


1976 ◽  
Vol 13 (4) ◽  
pp. 733-740 ◽  
Author(s):  
N. Veraverbeke ◽  
J. L. Teugels

Let Gn (x) be the distribution of the nth successive maximum of a random walk on the real line. Under conditions typical for complete exponential convergence, the decay of Gn (x) – limn→∞ Gn(x) is asymptotically equal to H(x) γn n–3/2 as n → ∞where γ < 1 and H(x) a function solely depending on x. For the case of drift to + ∞, G∞(x) = 0 and the result is new; for drift to – ∞we give a new proof, simplifying and correcting an earlier version in [9].


2021 ◽  
Vol 157 (7) ◽  
pp. 1610-1651
Author(s):  
Pascal Autissier ◽  
Dante Bonolis ◽  
Youness Lamzouri

In this paper, we investigate the distribution of the maximum of partial sums of families of $m$ -periodic complex-valued functions satisfying certain conditions. We obtain precise uniform estimates for the distribution function of this maximum in a near-optimal range. Our results apply to partial sums of Kloosterman sums and other families of $\ell$ -adic trace functions, and are as strong as those obtained by Bober, Goldmakher, Granville and Koukoulopoulos for character sums. In particular, we improve on the recent work of the third author for Birch sums. However, unlike character sums, we are able to construct families of $m$ -periodic complex-valued functions which satisfy our conditions, but for which the Pólya–Vinogradov inequality is sharp.


1950 ◽  
Vol 2 ◽  
pp. 375-384 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mark Kac ◽  
Harry Pollard

1. The problem. It has been shown [1] that if Xi, + X2, … are independent random variables each of density then(1.1)


Bernoulli ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 21 (3) ◽  
pp. 1844-1854 ◽  
Author(s):  
Anna De Masi ◽  
Errico Presutti ◽  
Dimitrios Tsagkarogiannis ◽  
Maria Eulalia Vares

1972 ◽  
Vol 9 (3) ◽  
pp. 572-579 ◽  
Author(s):  
D. J. Emery

It is shown that, under certain conditions, satisfied by stable distributions, symmetric distributions, distributions with zero mean and finite second moment and other distributions, the distribution function of the maxima of successive partial sums of identically distributed random variables has an asymptotic property. This property implies the regular variation of the tail of the distribution of the hitting times of the associated random walk, and hence that these hitting times belong to the domain of attraction of a stable law.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document