Domains of attraction for the subcritical Galton-Watson branching process

1968 ◽  
Vol 5 (1) ◽  
pp. 216-219 ◽  
Author(s):  
H. Rubin ◽  
D. Vere-Jones

Let F(z) = σ fjzj be the generating function for the offspring distribution {fj} from a single ancestor in the usual Galton-Watson process. It is well-known (see Harris [1]) that if Π(z) is the generating function of the distribution of ancestors in the 0th generation, the distribution of offspring at the nth generation has generating function where Fn(z), the nth functional iterate of F(z), gives the distribution of offspring at the nth generation from a single ancestor.

1968 ◽  
Vol 5 (01) ◽  
pp. 216-219 ◽  
Author(s):  
H. Rubin ◽  
D. Vere-Jones

Let F(z) = σ fjzj be the generating function for the offspring distribution {fj } from a single ancestor in the usual Galton-Watson process. It is well-known (see Harris [1]) that if Π(z) is the generating function of the distribution of ancestors in the 0th generation, the distribution of offspring at the nth generation has generating function where F n (z), the nth functional iterate of F(z), gives the distribution of offspring at the nth generation from a single ancestor.


1971 ◽  
Vol 8 (2) ◽  
pp. 407-412 ◽  
Author(s):  
R. A. Doney

1. Let {Z(t), t ≧ 0} be an age-dependent branching process with offspring generating function and life-time distribution function G(t). Denote by N(t) the progeny of the process, that is the total number of objects which have been born in [0, t], counting the ancestor. (See Section 2 for definitions.) Then in the Galton-Watson process (i.e., when G(t) = 0 for t ≦ 1, G(t) = 1 for t > 1) we have the simple relation Nn = Z0 + Z1 + ··· + Zn, so that the asymptotic behaviour of Nn as n → ∞ follows from a knowledge of the asymptotic behaviour of Zn. In particular, if 1 < m = h'(1) < ∞ and Zn(ω)/E(Zn) → Z(ω) > 0 then also Nn(ω)/E(Nn) → Z(ω) > 0; since E(Zn)/E(Nn) → 1 – m–1 this means that


1971 ◽  
Vol 8 (02) ◽  
pp. 407-412 ◽  
Author(s):  
R. A. Doney

1. Let {Z(t), t ≧ 0} be an age-dependent branching process with offspring generating function and life-time distribution function G(t). Denote by N(t) the progeny of the process, that is the total number of objects which have been born in [0, t], counting the ancestor. (See Section 2 for definitions.) Then in the Galton-Watson process (i.e., when G(t) = 0 for t ≦ 1, G(t) = 1 for t &gt; 1) we have the simple relation Nn = Z 0 + Z 1 + ··· + Zn , so that the asymptotic behaviour of Nn as n → ∞ follows from a knowledge of the asymptotic behaviour of Zn . In particular, if 1 &lt; m = h'(1) &lt; ∞ and Zn (ω)/E(Zn ) → Z(ω) &gt; 0 then also Nn (ω)/E(Nn ) → Z(ω) &gt; 0; since E(Zn )/E(Nn ) → 1 – m –1 this means that


2007 ◽  
Vol 44 (03) ◽  
pp. 753-769 ◽  
Author(s):  
S. V. Nagaev ◽  
V. Wachtel

In this paper we prove a conditional limit theorem for a critical Galton-Watson branching process {Z n ; n ≥ 0} with offspring generating function s + (1 − s)L((1 − s)−1), where L(x) is slowly varying. In contrast to a well-known theorem of Slack (1968), (1972) we use a functional normalization, which gives an exponential limit. We also give an alternative proof of Sze's (1976) result on the asymptotic behavior of the nonextinction probability.


1971 ◽  
Vol 8 (3) ◽  
pp. 589-598 ◽  
Author(s):  
Krishna B. Athreya

The functional equation ϕ(mu) = h(ϕ(u)) where is a probability generating function with 1 < m = h'(1 –) < ∞ and where F(t) is a non-decreasing right continuous function with F(0 –) = 0, F(0 +) < 1 and F(+ ∞) = 1 arises in a Galton-Watson process in a natural way. We prove here that for any if and only if This unifies several results in the literature on the supercritical Galton-Watson process. We generalize this to an age dependent branching process case as well.


1971 ◽  
Vol 8 (03) ◽  
pp. 589-598 ◽  
Author(s):  
Krishna B. Athreya

The functional equation ϕ(mu) = h(ϕ(u)) where is a probability generating function with 1 &lt; m = h'(1 –) &lt; ∞ and where F(t) is a non-decreasing right continuous function with F(0 –) = 0, F(0 +) &lt; 1 and F(+ ∞) = 1 arises in a Galton-Watson process in a natural way. We prove here that for any if and only if This unifies several results in the literature on the supercritical Galton-Watson process. We generalize this to an age dependent branching process case as well.


1967 ◽  
Vol 7 (4) ◽  
pp. 465-480 ◽  
Author(s):  
E. Seneta

SummaryIn general, information concerning the distribution of the time to absorption, T, of a simple branching (Galton-Watson) process for which extinction in finite mean time is certain, is difficult to obtain. The process of greatest biological interest is that for which the offspring distribution is Poisson, having p.g.f. F(s) = em(s-1), m < 1.


1974 ◽  
Vol 6 (03) ◽  
pp. 421-433 ◽  
Author(s):  
C. C. Heyde

A single realization {Z n , 0 ≦n≦N + 1} of a supercritical Galton-Watson process (so called) is considered and it is required to estimate the variance of the offspring distribution. A prospective estimator is proposed, where , and is shown to be strongly consistent on the non-extinction set. A central limit result and an iterated logarithm result are provided to give information on the rate of convergence of the estimator. It is also shown that the estimation results are robust in the sense that they continue to apply unchanged in the case where immigration occurs. Martingale limit theory is employed at each stage in obtaining the limit results.


1969 ◽  
Vol 6 (01) ◽  
pp. 201-204 ◽  
Author(s):  
Edward Pollak

Summary We consider a branching process for which the offspring distribution has the generating function f(t) and mean f '(1) = m &lt; 1. The probability that a line descended from an individual still survives in generation n is asymptotically of the form cmn. A method is derived whereby good bounds for c may be obtained. This method makes use of the first three moments of the distribution of offspring.


1969 ◽  
Vol 1 (1) ◽  
pp. 1-42 ◽  
Author(s):  
E. Seneta

In the present exposition we are concerned only with the simple Galton-Watson process, initiated by a single ancestor (Harris (1963), Chapter I). Let denote the probability generating function of the offspring distribution of a single individual. Our fundamental assumption, which holds throughout the sequel, is that fj ≠ 1, j = 0,1,2, …; in particular circumstances it shall be necessary to strengthen this to 0 < f0 ≡ F(0) < 1, which is the relevant assumption when extinction behaviour is to be considered. (Even so, our assumptions will always differ slightly from those of Harris (1963), p. 5.)


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document